Author Topic: Ursa Major Technologies  (Read 158669 times)

Re: Ursa Major Technologies
« Reply #240 on: 03/05/2025 04:13 pm »
Not sure when this happened, but Ursa is making satellite propulsion now. It's hydrazine monoprop.

Ursa Major's rocket engine business doesn't seem to be getting many customers and the customers Ursa does have are closer to bankruptcy than they are to being industry leaders. The competitors they're losing the most business to aren't other rocket engine companies such as Rocketdyne but launch vehicle companies that build their own engines in house. It may be impossible for Ursa to compete with in-house engines so it's sensible for them to pursue other businesses such as satellite propulsion.


That's my impression, too.  It makes me think there's something fundamentally wrong with Ursa's business model.  I'm not sure what else would explain the lack of sales when they've got what seem (to my inexpert eye) like some very nice hardware on offer.  Maybe they're just expensive because they need to support a bunch of development with no guarantee that any given product will sell?


I think if I were designing a launcher they'd be on the short-list of folks to talk to.

I think their main problem is consistently being behind where the most competitive launch companies needed them to be, so their only possible customers are the less competitive launch companies -- those "closer to bankruptcy than...being industry leaders." Consider their Arroway engine: I'm sure Rocket Lab would have loved to buy that and use it on Neutron, but it's coming online too late, so they needed to build Archimedes in-house. Firefly also built Miranda in-house (although they had more pertinent engine design experience than Rocket Lab, so their buy-or-make calculus was different). So who is Arroway for?

Adding to this; there were years where Hadley was the only complete product Ursa Major had. And Hadley doesn't make any sense to me.

Hadley is a 22kN engine, so about the same size as Rutherford. It wasn't finished until after Electron was flying. And, Peter Beck has said before, part of the reason Electron works is because it can run it's tanks to depletion, which you can't do with a staged combustion engine. At that small scale, whatever performance improvements you make with a staged combustion in specific impulse are almost certainly eaten back up by the residual propellant.

If you develop a component entirely without the rest of the system, and in fact without even knowing what the system will be, details like this are going to slip by you.
« Last Edit: 03/05/2025 04:14 pm by JEF_300 »
Wait, ∆V? This site will accept the ∆ symbol? How many times have I written out the word "delta" for no reason?

Online StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4311
  • UK
  • Liked: 6275
  • Likes Given: 924
Re: Ursa Major Technologies
« Reply #241 on: 07/21/2025 07:50 pm »
https://twitter.com/ursamajortech/status/1947355003796262968

Quote
For the second time, Ursa Major has successfully fired our 10” solid rocket motor with highly loaded grain showing repeatable results with rapid iteration, as seen in the motor start up.

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8582
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 3019
  • Likes Given: 2755
Re: Ursa Major Technologies
« Reply #242 on: 09/22/2025 09:18 pm »
"Ursa Major has been awarded a $34.9 million contract from an undisclosed U.S. aerospace and defence firm to deliver Draper engines and related services." https://defence-industry.eu/ursa-major-awarded-34-9-million-contract-to-advance-draper-rocket-engine-for-space-defence-missions/
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Offline Asteroza

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3127
  • Liked: 1211
  • Likes Given: 35
Re: Ursa Major Technologies
« Reply #243 on: 10/01/2025 02:15 pm »
A japanese startup appears to ordering Hadley for their hopper, possibly for their Falcon 9 clone.

https://innovative-space-carrier.co.jp/en/news/20250714


The startup had previously been pursuing an air breathing tripropellant SSTO spaceplane design...

The hopper flight is allegedly soon-ish, probably facing pressure from the success of Honda.

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7143
  • Erie, CO
  • Liked: 4754
  • Likes Given: 2712
Re: Ursa Major Technologies
« Reply #244 on: 11/06/2025 10:48 pm »
Cross-posting for relevance to Ursa Major:

https://twitter.com/rocketrepreneur/status/1986580512950132849

~Jon

Offline catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27544
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 22675
  • Likes Given: 13432
Re: Ursa Major Technologies
« Reply #245 on: 12/01/2025 06:48 pm »
https://twitter.com/ursamajortech/status/1995547905139355767

Quote
Ursa Major
@ursamajortech
In preparation for the first flight test, Ursa Major has successfully static fired the Affordable Rapid Missile Demonstrator (ARMD), powered by the Draper liquid rocket engine, as part of the @AFResearchLab (AFRL) initiative to rapidly demonstrate affordable hypersonic munition concepts. In this recent ground test, Ursa Major static fired ARMD for the full-duration mission cycle and demonstrated bipropellant operations. This static fire comes just over six months after AFRL contract award.
PSA #3:  Paywall? View this video on how-to temporary Disable Java-Script: youtu.be/KvBv16tw-UM

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1