Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 : LC-39A : November 2018  (Read 194484 times)

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3996
  • Liked: 2061
  • Likes Given: 1239
Re: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 mission : LC-39A : NET June 2018
« Reply #240 on: 03/21/2018 05:34 PM »
The date on STP-2 was updated from NET June to NET June 13th in the general launch log thread last week. Is that a reasonably solid date?

Offline russianhalo117

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4372
  • AR USA / Berlin, DE / Moscow, RF
  • Liked: 1006
  • Likes Given: 560
Re: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 mission : LC-39A : NET June 2018
« Reply #241 on: 03/21/2018 05:41 PM »
The date on STP-2 was updated from NET June to NET June 13th in the general launch log thread last week. Is that a reasonably solid date?
It still says its a NET but it is more of a promising date than just NET June. Keep in mind that for a while now in the USA launch schedule the launch date is NET 13 June 2018 to NLT 13 August 2018.
« Last Edit: 03/21/2018 05:45 PM by russianhalo117 »

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3290
  • US
  • Liked: 2661
  • Likes Given: 1591
Re: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 mission : LC-39A : NET June 2018
« Reply #242 on: 03/21/2018 06:15 PM »
The date on STP-2 was updated from NET June to NET June 13th in the general launch log thread last week. Is that a reasonably solid date?

The 13th is probably a solid NET date but I wouldn't consider it a solid launch date yet.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3290
  • US
  • Liked: 2661
  • Likes Given: 1591
Re: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 : LC-39A : NET June 13, 2018
« Reply #243 on: 04/13/2018 10:48 PM »
You never know what you'll find when you get bored and poke around the FCC database...

ELS File Number 0235-EX-PL-2016
Quote
TBEx will be inserted into the nominal STP-2 CubeSat orbit with apogee at 860 km, perigee
at 300 km, and an inclination of 28.4.

This was from a 2017 document, which is five years newer than the publicly released mission requirements document you can find at the top of the thread.

edit: attach document with cubesat mission details
« Last Edit: 04/13/2018 11:02 PM by gongora »

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3290
  • US
  • Liked: 2661
  • Likes Given: 1591
Re: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 : LC-39A : NET June 13, 2018
« Reply #244 on: 04/14/2018 12:46 AM »
Here is the ODAR for the three ELaNa XV CubeSats.  It gives the orbit as 300x860 at 28.5 degrees.  It also shows the June 13 target date was already set as of Dec. 12, 2017 (a couple months before the FH Demo launch).

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3290
  • US
  • Liked: 2661
  • Likes Given: 1591
Re: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 : LC-39A : NET June 13, 2018
« Reply #245 on: 04/14/2018 05:40 PM »
The Planetary Society hasn't changed their ODAR for Lightsail-2, it still shows deployment at 720km circular, 24 degrees.
FCC application still pending, FCC ELS File Number 0338-EX-ST-2018

Offline tleski

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
  • Washington, DC
  • Liked: 237
  • Likes Given: 332
Re: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 : LC-39A : NET June 13, 2018
« Reply #246 on: 04/16/2018 12:57 AM »
On the Space Show dated April 10th, Casey Dreier (Planetary Society) mentioned that the Lightsail-2 launch slipped from June to September. It would mean STP-2 slipped. Do we have any information confirming this from other sources? He seems to be pretty well informed.

Link to the interview (the Lightsail-2 is discussed ~33minutes into the show):
http://thespaceshow.com/show/10-apr-2018/broadcast-3098-casey-dreier

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3290
  • US
  • Liked: 2661
  • Likes Given: 1591
Re: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 : LC-39A : NET June 13, 2018
« Reply #247 on: 04/16/2018 01:06 AM »
It would not be surprising at all if it slips a few months.  There wasn't really any chance of June happening.

Offline cebri

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 123
  • Spain
  • Liked: 150
  • Likes Given: 86
Re: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 : LC-39A : NET September 2018
« Reply #248 on: 04/20/2018 10:18 AM »
Kind of a bummer, i'll probably be in the States in June and i was hoping to see it go. Not really that suprised tho.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3290
  • US
  • Liked: 2661
  • Likes Given: 1591
Re: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 : LC-39A : NET September 2018
« Reply #249 on: 04/24/2018 09:34 PM »
General Atomics Completes Ready-For-Launch Testing of Orbital Test Bed Satellite
Quote
SAN DIEGO, CA, 23 APRIL 2018 - General Atomics Electromagnetic Systems (GA-EMS) announced today that it has completed full system and “ready for launch” pre-flight testing of its Orbital Test Bed (OTB) satellite. OTB will launch as part of the U.S. Air Force’s Space Technology Program (STP-2) flight on the SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket. The OTB hosts multiple payloads on a single platform for on-orbit technology demonstration. Among the hosted payloads on OTB is NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate’s Deep Space Atomic Clock, designed and built at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which supports deep space navigation and exploration.

“The completion of system testing marks a significant milestone, allowing us to effectively “button up” the OTB satellite in anticipation of delivery to Cape Canaveral for launch into space,” stated Scott Forney, president of GA-EMS. “We believe OTB is a new paradigm in hosted payload satellite design and is paving the way to make space more affordable and accessible to customers looking to demonstrate and validate their technologies on-orbit.”

GA-EMS’ low-Earth orbit OTB is a versatile, modular platform designed for the simultaneous launch of multiple demonstration payloads. Hosting multiple payloads on a single satellite eliminates the need for customers to bear the costly burden of a dedicated platform and launch.

“As the small satellite industry grows, the OTB hosted payload platform can increase the number of flight opportunities, reduce the cost to access space, and provide a more adaptable approach to managing the integration, launch, and on-orbit operations to support commercial, civil, educational, and military payloads,” added Nick Bucci, vice president of Missile Defense and Space at GA-EMS. “From the perspective of both the payload customer and host provider, this new approach offers significant advantages and benefits over classic space industry practices to help rapidly space-qualify new equipment.”

GA-EMS continues to expand its portfolio of small satellites and mission-support capabilities, providing ground-to-on-orbit solutions that offer a high degree of modularity and payload flexibility to suit a variety of mission and customer requirements.

Offline Eagandale4114

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 190
  • Liked: 231
  • Likes Given: 340

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3290
  • US
  • Liked: 2661
  • Likes Given: 1591

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4155
  • Liked: 1428
  • Likes Given: 1179
A system engineer working a payload on STP-2 told me that SpaceX has told the team with  that the launch is now targeted for November 19. 
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3290
  • US
  • Liked: 2661
  • Likes Given: 1591
Re: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 : LC-39A : November 2018
« Reply #253 on: 06/08/2018 01:58 AM »
It will be interesting to see where DM-1 ends up in relation to this flight.

Offline deruch

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2188
  • California
  • Liked: 1695
  • Likes Given: 3400
Re: SpaceX Falcon Heavy : STP-2 : LC-39A : November 2018
« Reply #254 on: 06/08/2018 07:43 PM »
It will be interesting to see where DM-1 ends up in relation to this flight.

I wouldn't be surprised if current delays in preparation of LC-39 for DM-1 are causing the slippage of STP-2 since both need that pad.
Shouldn't reality posts be in "Advanced concepts"?  --Nomadd

Offline vaporcobra

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 988
  • Tacoma, WA
  • Liked: 1640
  • Likes Given: 2127
What is the purpose of the 5 tonnes of ballast on this mission? Is it simply to ensure that FH is capable of meeting the EELV New Entrant specifications?
No. The launcher is too powerfull for just the payload alone. It requires additional payload mass (provided by means of ballast) to prevent over-performance.

Perhaps this is an ignorant question, but why is this mission still manifested on a Falcon Heavy? I'm trying to figure out the rationale, especially given the unbelievably severe delays STP-2 has been beset with as a result of LV choice. Sunk cost fallacy?

It's just hard for me to see any actual value in adding a huge amount of ballast to "stress" test a LV that has already been successfully demonstrated with an interplanetary launch.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3290
  • US
  • Liked: 2661
  • Likes Given: 1591
What is the purpose of the 5 tonnes of ballast on this mission? Is it simply to ensure that FH is capable of meeting the EELV New Entrant specifications?
No. The launcher is too powerfull for just the payload alone. It requires additional payload mass (provided by means of ballast) to prevent over-performance.

Perhaps this is an ignorant question, but why is this mission still manifested on a Falcon Heavy? I'm trying to figure out the rationale, especially given the unbelievably severe delays STP-2 has been beset with as a result of LV choice. Sunk cost fallacy?

It's just hard for me to see any actual value in adding a huge amount of ballast to "stress" test a LV that has already been successfully demonstrated with an interplanetary launch.

The STP contracts are an onramp to DoD certification for new vehicles.  It's a test flight.  The payload isn't all that relevant.

Tags: