Author Topic: Space Force Cislunar Space Domain Awareness (CHPS, xGEO, etc)  (Read 8305 times)

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6414
  • Liked: 9087
  • Likes Given: 885
https://spacenews.com/industry-proposals-sought-for-cislunar-highway-patrol-satellite/

Quote
The Air Force Research Laboratory is asking companies to submit ideas on how they would design and develop a spacecraft to monitor outer space beyond Earth’s orbit.

AFRL’s Space Vehicles Directorate is planning an experiment called Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS). The satellite would operate beyond geosynchronous orbit, in the region near the moon.

The project is being managed by the Space Force’s Space Enterprise Consortium (SpEC). Only members of the consortium can view the details of the posting and can compete for contracts. Submissions are due April 1.

“The CHPS program will deliver space domain awareness in a region that is one thousand times greater than our current area of responsibility,” said Michael Lopez, CHPS program manager. “AFRL is interested in hearing from companies that may have ideas that differ from ours, and could contribute to the satellite’s capabilities.”
« Last Edit: 10/01/2022 11:53 am by su27k »

Online jstrotha0975

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 510
  • United States
  • Liked: 297
  • Likes Given: 2365
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #1 on: 03/23/2022 04:44 pm »
What are they specifically looking for out of Earth's orbit?

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5597
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 8461
  • Likes Given: 37
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #2 on: 03/24/2022 08:24 am »
Presumably a way to monitor orbital parameters of objects beyond Earth orbit. Currently, if an object is manoeuvring it may take a significant amount of time to even realise it has done so let alone find it again (and confirm the new object you found was indeed the object you were previously looking at). Which means if you're sending any vehicles outside of Earth orbit there's not a guarantee you can predict conjunctions in advance.
For example, the Chang'e 5 orbiter fliting about from Lunar orbit to Earth to Earth-Sun L1 to Lunar orbit again. This is a scenario that has actually happened, not just a theoretical capability.

Online oldAtlas_Eguy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5284
  • Florida
  • Liked: 4975
  • Likes Given: 1308
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #3 on: 03/24/2022 02:45 pm »
The simple task of monitoring artificial accelerating objects in cis-Lunar is a definite difficult task. Since the ranges between the platform and possible objects is a order of magnitude more than what faces the same task in GEO and below orbits. Also the lower orbits are in a limited field of view for doing the monitoring work vs cis-Lunar which in some cases is a full spherical monitoring environment.  Even if using the same type of instruments as used in lower orbits you would need up to 50X the number of monitoring instruments as needed for full coverage in GEO and below Earth orbits. But these instruments would have to be more advanced to be able to be 10X more sensitive to be able to even see any objects.

It is a very tall task. But obviously one that is needed. As well as a cis-Lunar internet (sat to sat linkup). So a high quantity small medium sat vs a few very large expensive ones may be the way to go.

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6414
  • Liked: 9087
  • Likes Given: 885
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #4 on: 04/18/2022 02:21 am »
On National Security | The moon emerging as the next frontier for military operations

Quote from: SpaceNews
As NASA pushes forward to get humans back on the moon, questions have emerged on what this means for the Space Force and what role it might play in lunar activities.

If successful, NASA’s return to the moon will lead to a permanent presence there and lay the groundwork for scientific research and commercial development.

Like a Coast Guard for space, a military force conceivably would be needed to protect lines of commerce in the lunar economy. A 2020 memo signed by NASA and the Space Force noted that a military presence near the moon would help ensure civilians can operate safely.

Online Coastal Ron

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8571
  • I live... along the coast
  • Liked: 9934
  • Likes Given: 11640
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #5 on: 04/18/2022 02:58 am »
https://spacenews.com/industry-proposals-sought-for-cislunar-highway-patrol-satellite/

Quote
...
AFRL’s Space Vehicles Directorate is planning an experiment called Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS). The satellite would operate beyond geosynchronous orbit, in the region near the moon.
...

As someone old enough to remember the 70's CHiPs TV show, I think this is not only a dumb acronym, but the wrong description implication.

As a former private pilot I'm familiar with "highways in the sky", which are really just connections between waypoints that make it easier to keep traffic organized (i.e. reduce the likelihood of collisions). We don't have waypoints in space, just orbits, and even orbits don't have to have the same inclination, so are planning to ticket spacecraft that are not on the right trajectory??

If they want to rip off a name from a 70's TV show, they should consider "SID", which was the "Space Intruder Detector" from the TV show UFO. Far more appropriate than guys in leather riding motorcycles around...  ;)
If we don't continuously lower the cost to access space, how are we ever going to afford to expand humanity out into space?

Offline Hog

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Woodstock
  • Liked: 1674
  • Likes Given: 6635
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #6 on: 04/18/2022 04:32 pm »
https://spacenews.com/industry-proposals-sought-for-cislunar-highway-patrol-satellite/

Quote
...
AFRL’s Space Vehicles Directorate is planning an experiment called Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS). The satellite would operate beyond geosynchronous orbit, in the region near the moon.
...

As someone old enough to remember the 70's CHiPs TV show, I think this is not only a dumb acronym, but the wrong description implication.

As a former private pilot I'm familiar with "highways in the sky", which are really just connections between waypoints that make it easier to keep traffic organized (i.e. reduce the likelihood of collisions). We don't have waypoints in space, just orbits, and even orbits don't have to have the same inclination, so are planning to ticket spacecraft that are not on the right trajectory??

If they want to rip off a name from a 70's TV show, they should consider "SID", which was the "Space Intruder Detector" from the TV show UFO. Far more appropriate than guys in leather riding motorcycles around...  ;)
If you are going to splurge for a SID, it's only a matter of time before there's a SID/D(Space Intruder Detector/Destructor) waiting in the wings to collect some of that juicy military budget. 
Paul

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6414
  • Liked: 9087
  • Likes Given: 885
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #7 on: 04/22/2022 04:15 am »
To infinity and beyond: New Space Force unit to monitor ‘xGEO’ beyond Earth’s orbit

Quote from: breakingdefense.com
Space Systems Command is launching new efforts to help Space Force monitor the vast volumes of space beyond the Moon, Mars and eventually even farther, officials said this week.

Lt. Col. Matt Lintker, who commands the 18th Space Defense (formerly Control) Squadron that currently is charged with monitoring near-Earth space, told the C4ISRNet conference on Wednesday that the service now has stood up a new 19th Space Defense Squadron with the mission of tracking what Space Force officials now refer to as “xGEO” space.

Geosynchronous Orbit (GEO) is essentially the outer orbit of Earth, some 36,000 kilometers above sea level. The new 19th Space Defense Squadron, with its “xGEO” remit, would have oversight over everything beyond that, including cislunar space, or the area around the Moon. Cislunar is seen as particularly fertile ground for future satellites, thanks to the benefit of Lagrange points, positions in space where, due to the gravitational pulls of nearby celestial bodies, objects essentially tend to stay put.

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6414
  • Liked: 9087
  • Likes Given: 885
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #8 on: 05/17/2022 04:09 am »
U.S. Space Force sees future demand for surveillance beyond Earth orbit

Quote from: SpaceNews
During a presentation last week at the Air War College in Montgomery, Alabama, senior Air Force and Space Force officials were briefed on Project Rocket, an Air Force-funded experiment that looked at the challenges of tracking objects in space beyond Earth’s orbit.

The project was led by a group of officers selected for the Blue Horizons fellowship, created to help military leaders develop entrepreneurial skills and examine the impact of technology on national security.

“We pitched the idea of focusing on how do we provide a combatant commander the capability to track adversary activity in xGEO,” said Lt. Col. Phoenix Torrijos, an intelligence and foreign area officer who led Project Rocket.

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6414
  • Liked: 9087
  • Likes Given: 885
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #9 on: 07/09/2022 01:05 pm »
Don’t Delay Getting Serious About Cislunar Security

Quote from: warontherocks.com
Recently, analysts predicted that a rocket stage from a Chinese space mission would crash into the moon. The impact was predicted to happen in March 2022. Did it? The world didn’t know until late June — almost four months later.

More and more space activities are being planned for the moon and the space near it, commonly known as cislunar space. This expansion is being driven by several factors, including the miniaturization of computing technology, decreasing costs of launch and manufacturing, growing maturity of the commercial sector, and renewed geopolitical rivalries motivating the exploitation of space for strategic purposes. But our thinking has not caught up to this changing reality. We lack situational awareness and effective frameworks for reasoning about this domain. We need new tools to help us understand this emerging landscape, lest perceptions become distorted, increasing the risk of conflict.

Offline Yiosie

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
  • Liked: 624
  • Likes Given: 85
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #10 on: 08/30/2022 09:33 am »
New head of AFRL space vehicles looking for talent to help push technology forward [dated Aug. 29]

Quote from: SpaceNews
The Air Force Research Laboratory’s Space Vehicles Directorate over the next three years hopes to launch big-ticket military experiments, including a GPS-like navigation satellite, a solar power spacecraft and a deep-space mission to monitor regions around the moon.

<snip>

Previously known as the Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS), the experiment has been renamed Oracle. Raley said the lab decided to rebrand the project and select a name from Greek mythology, in line with NASA’s preference to name moon missions after Greek gods.

<snip>

AFRL is evaluating industry proposals for Oracle, Raley said. “There’s a lot that we need to learn about how to operate, navigate and communicate from that section of space.”

A priority for the military is to “understand if other countries are operating out there, and what capabilities they have,” he said.

However, he added, “it is not 100% clear yet that there’s a lot of military utility to operating in cislunar space. And so a lot of what we’re doing is starting to answer that question before the U.S. government makes a bigger investment in militarizing that space.”

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6414
  • Liked: 9087
  • Likes Given: 885
Space Force studying requirements for cislunar space domain awareness

Quote from: SpaceNews
The Space Force expects to know by next spring what capabilities it will need to carry out space domain awareness activities in cislunar space.

In a talk during the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies (AMOS) Conference here Sept. 28, Col. Marc Brock, commander of Space Delta 2, the unit responsible for space domain awareness for the Space Force, said a study is underway by the 19th Space Defense Squadron (SDS) on what’s needed to monitor activities beyond geostationary orbit, called xGEO by the Space Force, and out to the moon.

That study, he said, will look at requirements to create an “operational capability” for cislunar or xGEO space domain awareness. That includes training, technologies and centers needed to carry out the mission. He said that report should be ready by next April or May.

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8047
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 5040
  • Likes Given: 4371
AFRL: Oracle Satellite - Cislunar Space

Quote
Feb 10, 2023 
The Air Force Research Laboratory’s Oracle spacecraft will collect observations of resident space objects in the region near the Moon and potentially beyond. These observations will be cataloged and used to maintain awareness in the regime.

Oracle will deliver advanced space capabilities in support of the U.S. Space Force’s space situational awareness mission.

Tony De La Rosa

Offline spacexplorer

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 551
  • italy
  • Liked: 301
  • Likes Given: 301
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #13 on: 05/05/2023 07:50 am »
What are they specifically looking for out of Earth's orbit?

They can't say "we are going to patrol Moon surface", so they say  "we are going to patrol space out of Earth orbit".
But as soon as Moon will become a feasable commercial target, there will be need to defend private properties from competitors.

Online ThatOldJanxSpirit

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 886
  • Liked: 1357
  • Likes Given: 3125
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #14 on: 05/06/2023 02:26 pm »
What are they specifically looking for out of Earth's orbit?

They can't say "we are going to patrol Moon surface", so they say  "we are going to patrol space out of Earth orbit".
But as soon as Moon will become a feasable commercial target, there will be need to defend private properties from competitors.

Personal opinion: the battlefield is critical militarily and civilian infrastructure in GEO and below. The threat is losing situational awareness of hostile assets in cislunar space that could then come into play in this battlefield with no warning.

There is nothing else out there worth fighting for for in the near/mid term.

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16800
  • Liked: 6736
  • Likes Given: 2931
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #15 on: 09/14/2023 04:33 pm »
What are they specifically looking for out of Earth's orbit?

They can't say "we are going to patrol Moon surface", so they say  "we are going to patrol space out of Earth orbit".
But as soon as Moon will become a feasable commercial target, there will be need to defend private properties from competitors.

Private property of land on the Moon isn't allowed. Resource extraction is allowed but I don't think that we will be seeing space pirates any time soon.

Offline Paul451

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3452
  • Australia
  • Liked: 2456
  • Likes Given: 2110
Re: Space Force's Cislunar Highway Patrol System (CHPS)
« Reply #16 on: 09/15/2023 01:46 am »
there will be need to defend private properties from competitors.
Private property of land on the Moon isn't allowed. Resource extraction is allowed but I don't think that we will be seeing space pirates any time soon.

You added "of land", it wasn't in the original quote. The OST recognises absolute sovereignty over spacecraft launched into and facilities constructed in space.

[Indeed, too "absolute" IMO, since it denies the possibility of legal abandonment, and so innately prohibits basic salvage rights.]
« Last Edit: 09/15/2023 10:11 am by Paul451 »

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6658
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 1618
  • Likes Given: 1544
There is nothing else out there worth fighting for for in the near/mid term.

xGEO awareness enables geopolitical soft power.
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Online VSECOTSPE

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1355
  • Liked: 4311
  • Likes Given: 2

It’s mostly about protecting assets in GEO and high orbits from attacks originating from even farther out where we’re currently not surveilling.  It doesn’t take much delta-V to push an attack sat out of GEO, loop it out of range of GSSAP (Geosynchornous Space Situational Awareness Program) sats, and bring it back to on top of a DSP/SBIRS, GPS, etc. assets.

The nightmare scenario is not only an attack that disables some of those missile warning and geopositioning capabilities, temporarily making our terrestrial assets in theater blind and dumb at the outset of a major enemy operation (think invasion of Taiwan), as bad as that would be.  But it’s also an attack that is not attributable to any enemy because we couldn’t track their incoming attack sat.  That could leave us bumbling around trying to figure out our response for an extended period of time.

Software attacks, dazzling lasers, and plain old electronic noise are much more likely means of satellite interference in wartime for the foreseeable future.  But it’s worth a couple bucks to see if anyone has an elegant solution to tracking beyond GEO to cover that particular weakness.

Offline octavo

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 244
  • Liked: 184
  • Likes Given: 725

It’s mostly about protecting assets in GEO and high orbits from attacks originating from even farther out where we’re currently not surveilling.  It doesn’t take much delta-V to push an attack sat out of GEO, loop it out of range of GSSAP (Geosynchornous Space Situational Awareness Program) sats, and bring it back to on top of a DSP/SBIRS, GPS, etc. assets.

The nightmare scenario is not only an attack that disables some of those missile warning and geopositioning capabilities, temporarily making our terrestrial assets in theater blind and dumb at the outset of a major enemy operation (think invasion of Taiwan), as bad as that would be.  But it’s also an attack that is not attributable to any enemy because we couldn’t track their incoming attack sat.  That could leave us bumbling around trying to figure out our response for an extended period of time.

Software attacks, dazzling lasers, and plain old electronic noise are much more likely means of satellite interference in wartime for the foreseeable future.  But it’s worth a couple bucks to see if anyone has an elegant solution to tracking beyond GEO to cover that particular weakness.

This is the scariest post I've ever read on this forum. Also the first time seeing 'nightmare scenario' was followed by an actually nightmarish scenario.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0