Sure this isn't because the assumptions of the analysis aren't detailed, challenged, and explained?
Quote from: nooneofconsequence on 06/03/2009 11:35 pmSure this isn't because the assumptions of the analysis aren't detailed, challenged, and explained?That's why I said if the assumptions are controversial to bury them in an appendix Danny Deger
Quote from: Danny Dot on 06/03/2009 11:37 pmQuote from: nooneofconsequence on 06/03/2009 11:35 pmSure this isn't because the assumptions of the analysis aren't detailed, challenged, and explained?That's why I said if the assumptions are controversial to bury them in an appendix Danny DegerThen it is the requirement of a rapid response team to read the appendix ahead of time, find the buried item, respond to it, and schedule it for review by the commission BEFORE the agenda is flooded with make work.So the assumptions of the analysis are detailed, challenged, and explained.
I think removing him from the lead of Augustine analysis support and a verbal reprimand would suffice. This is of course assuming he IS guilty of attempting to stack the deck like it appears he did during ESAS.