Author Topic: Kosmos-482 (V-72 №671) Stranded Venera Programme Spacecraft Reentered  (Read 37848 times)

Offline Skylab

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
  • Liked: 71
  • Likes Given: 55
Story: http://earth-chronicles.com/space/the-soviet-station-venus-in-the-coming-years-will-fall-to-earth.html

"On March 27, 1972, Venera-8 station went into space. On March 31, the USSR attempted to launch its “twin”, but at the stage of the accelerating unit, which from the near-earth orbit had to lead the station to the interplanetary flight trajectory, the engine failed and the engine turned off. The station, together with the accelerating block, remained in an elongated orbit, revolving around the Earth. In order not to report a failure, instead of the name “Venus-9”, the device was called “Cosmos-482”. In turn, “Venus-8” landed on the surface of Venus and for the first time in the world transmitted scientific information about its surface."

And here's a Russian source for this:
https://habr.com/post/416329/

Offline Alter Sachse

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2803
  • Near Heidelberg
  • Liked: 1826
  • Likes Given: 2340
Cosmos 482 burnt down 1981 May 5 in the earth's atmosphere.
The object in Earth orbit is probably the landing capsule, which was separated 1972 July 29.*

*may be "July 29" is wrong.
« Last Edit: 07/15/2018 06:47 pm by Alter Sachse »
One day you're a hero  next day you're a clown  there's nothing that is in between
        Jeff Lynne - "21century man"

Offline johnfwhitesell

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 319
  • Liked: 109
  • Likes Given: 198
This post made me aware of the Venus landers which I didn't even know existed.  Amazing!  They had to make machinery at earth temperatures that would work after they had been heated up to hundreds of degrees celcius, causing the metals to expand.  I thought that the technology to put a machine on the surface of Venus was decades in the future but it was actually decades in the past.

http://mentallandscape.com/C_CatalogVenus.htm
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera09_Processed.jpg
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera10_Processed.jpg
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera13_Camera1.jpg
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera13_Camera2.jpg
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera14_Camera1.jpg
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera14_Camera2.jpg

Offline WindnWar

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 561
  • South Carolina
  • Liked: 341
  • Likes Given: 1865
Cosmos 482 burnt down 1981 May 5 in the earth's atmosphere.
The object in Earth orbit is probably the landing capsule, which was separated 1972 July 29.

If it is the landing capsule I wonder if it'll make it to the surface in one piece given it was meant to survive the conditions on Venus. Not that it will be found.

Offline Alter Sachse

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2803
  • Near Heidelberg
  • Liked: 1826
  • Likes Given: 2340
One day you're a hero  next day you're a clown  there's nothing that is in between
        Jeff Lynne - "21century man"

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17811
  • Liked: 10646
  • Likes Given: 2
The last time a Soviet Venus probe fell back to Earth it was not pretty:

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15121
  • UK
  • Liked: 4374
  • Likes Given: 220
The last time a Soviet Venus probe fell back to Earth it was not pretty:

Is that from the Six Million Dollar Man? As isn’t there an episode where people are terrorised by a robotic space vehicle?

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14908
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 9822
  • Likes Given: 103399
The last time a Soviet Venus probe fell back to Earth it was not pretty:

Is that from the Six Million Dollar Man? As isn’t there an episode where people are terrorised by a robotic space vehicle?

"Guest starring" in two 2-part episodes!
"Deathprobe"
"Return of Deathprobe"

Steve vs. probe:
« Last Edit: 07/09/2018 10:23 pm by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline Skylab

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
  • Liked: 71
  • Likes Given: 55
If it is the landing capsule I wonder if it'll make it to the surface in one piece given it was meant to survive the conditions on Venus. Not that it will be found.
I doubt it, as it won't have such a dense atmosphere to brake against, so I reckon it will burn up or break apart during the faster descent.
« Last Edit: 07/09/2018 08:24 pm by Skylab »

Offline RonM

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3340
  • Atlanta, Georgia USA
  • Liked: 2233
  • Likes Given: 1584
The last time a Soviet Venus probe fell back to Earth it was not pretty:

Is that from the Six Million Dollar Man? As isn’t there an episode where people are terrorised by a robotic space vehicle?

"Guest starring" in two 2-part episodes!
"Deathprobe"
"Return of Deathprobe"

Yeah, they don't build them like Deathprobe anymore.  :)

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17811
  • Liked: 10646
  • Likes Given: 2
Yeah, they don't build them like Deathprobe anymore.  :)

No matter what you do, do not taunt Deathprobe. It doesn't like that.

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15121
  • UK
  • Liked: 4374
  • Likes Given: 220
The last time a Soviet Venus probe fell back to Earth it was not pretty:

Is that from the Six Million Dollar Man? As isn’t there an episode where people are terrorised by a robotic space vehicle?

"Guest starring" in two 2-part episodes!
"Deathprobe"
"Return of Deathprobe"

Steve vs. probe:

What an awesome fight, they don’t make them like that any more. Also more space probes should be fitted with lassoes!

Offline plutogno

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
  • Toulouse, France and Milan, Italy
  • Liked: 258
  • Likes Given: 35
IIRC radiation from a returning Venus probe was the cause of the zombie apocalypse in the classic "Night of the Living Dead"

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17811
  • Liked: 10646
  • Likes Given: 2
IIRC radiation from a returning Venus probe was the cause of the zombie apocalypse in the classic "Night of the Living Dead"

So I think the one thing we can all agree on is that we're doomed.

Offline johnfwhitesell

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 319
  • Liked: 109
  • Likes Given: 198
I for one welcome our NeoSoviet overlords.

Offline Phillip Clark

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
  • Hastings, England
  • Liked: 560
  • Likes Given: 1078
This post made me aware of the Venus landers which I didn't even know existed.  Amazing!  They had to make machinery at earth temperatures that would work after they had been heated up to hundreds of degrees celcius, causing the metals to expand.  I thought that the technology to put a machine on the surface of Venus was decades in the future but it was actually decades in the past.

Venera 7 was actually the first spacecraft to send signals back from the surface of another planet when it transmitted from the surface of Venus in December 1970.   At the time the Russians had started operating Lunokhod 1 on the Moon, so they became the first nation to be receiving signals from the surfaces of two worlds.   Don't forget that a year later they (briefly) got the first signals from the surface of Mars as well: of course Luna 9 had given them the first survivable landing on the Moon in 1966.   Most of these "firsts" are now forgotten of course.
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from going insane - WJ.

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10349
  • Liked: 746
  • Likes Given: 734
Wait a minute.  The landing capsule separated from the main vehicle in 1972 and the main vehicle re-entered. What has been keeping the capsule in orbit since separation?

Offline ddunham

  • Member
  • Posts: 55
  • Liked: 5
  • Likes Given: 6
From (unsourced) wikipedia:

Quote
It separated into four pieces, two of which remained in low Earth orbit and decayed within 48 hours into south New Zealand (known as the Ashburton balls incident), and two pieces (presumably the payload and detached engine unit) went into a higher 210 x 9800 km orbit.

Offline Phillip Clark

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
  • Hastings, England
  • Liked: 560
  • Likes Given: 1078
Wait a minute.  The landing capsule separated from the main vehicle in 1972 and the main vehicle re-entered. What has been keeping the capsule in orbit since separation?

Let's think about the orbital data.

The complete Venera/Cosmos 482 spacecraft was placed in the following orbit after the fourth stage shut down early:

1972 Apr  2.181    52.164 deg     201.414 min     206-9,802 km

The Venus entry capsule was clearly on a timer and so it separated in Earth orbit, thinking that it was approaching Venus:

1972 Jul  4.930     52.139            200.253           210-9,710

At this time the orbital data of the main spacecraft bus which would have either burned up in the venerian atmosphere or simply flown  past the planet was:

1972 Jul  4.815     52.118            198.821           210-9,602

Clearly, orbital perturbations were slowly increasing perigee.

So, the separation gave a small impulse to the capsule, increasing apogee by 100 km or so.

I am sure that the difference between the ballistic characteristics, the masses (capsule - 495 kg, main bus - 1,184-495 = 689 kg) and the different orbits of the two objects is enough to explain the longer lifetime.

By the way, the orbit of Cosmos 482 was very similar to the final orbits of the three T2K lunar lander tests which had been conducted: Cosmos 379, 398 and 434.   At first it was thought Cosmos 482 might have been another flight in that series but the placement of the objects in orbit, together with the position of Venus at the time of launch, quickly showed that Cosmos 4382 had been an intended Venus probe.


« Last Edit: 07/11/2018 07:47 am by Phillip Clark »
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from going insane - WJ.

Offline gwiz

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 607
  • Cornwall
  • Liked: 148
  • Likes Given: 31
Vaguely recall someone getting a good photo of Kosmos 482 and showing it was still the complete vehicle with the capsule still attached.

Offline ejb749


Offline Archibald

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2611
  • Liked: 500
  • Likes Given: 1096
They should have hired Wonderwoman for the job. She would have flipped that agressive soviet probe with the tip of a finger.
« Last Edit: 07/11/2018 04:45 pm by Archibald »
Han shot first and Gwynne Shotwell !

Offline Alter Sachse

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2803
  • Near Heidelberg
  • Liked: 1826
  • Likes Given: 2340
2 large objects burned up in 1981 and 1983.
It is believed that it was the probe (Cosmos 482) and "blok L" (stage 4).
One day you're a hero  next day you're a clown  there's nothing that is in between
        Jeff Lynne - "21century man"

Offline Alter Sachse

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2803
  • Near Heidelberg
  • Liked: 1826
  • Likes Given: 2340
The still-in-orbit object 1972-023E is called a "fragment" in RAE-table.
« Last Edit: 07/11/2018 05:11 pm by Alter Sachse »
One day you're a hero  next day you're a clown  there's nothing that is in between
        Jeff Lynne - "21century man"

Offline gwiz

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 607
  • Cornwall
  • Liked: 148
  • Likes Given: 31
The photograph clearly shows that 1972-023E is the complete probe and it was still in orbit in 2011.  Clearly when whatever separated in June 1972 (capsule thermal cover would be my guess) the wrong item was labelled as debris.

Offline Phillip Clark

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
  • Hastings, England
  • Liked: 560
  • Likes Given: 1078
Vaguely recall someone getting a good photo of Kosmos 482 and showing it was still the complete vehicle with the capsule still attached.

Depends when the photo was taken of course.
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from going insane - WJ.

Offline Alter Sachse

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2803
  • Near Heidelberg
  • Liked: 1826
  • Likes Given: 2340
1972-023E
(2018 July 09)
52.05° 112.39min 202-2471 km
One day you're a hero  next day you're a clown  there's nothing that is in between
        Jeff Lynne - "21century man"

Offline gwiz

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 607
  • Cornwall
  • Liked: 148
  • Likes Given: 31
Depends when the photo was taken of course.
2011, see this link posted above by ejb749:
http://www.russianspaceweb.com/venera72_kosmos482.html
« Last Edit: 07/12/2018 02:27 pm by gwiz »

Offline Phillip Clark

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2616
  • Hastings, England
  • Liked: 560
  • Likes Given: 1078
I note that Anatoly Zak says "With less degree of certainty, it can be speculated that the Venus lander is still attached to the main probe while its upper stage is not" (my own emphasis).

After my earlier posting, I realised that the appearance of Object E would be too early for the timed separation of the capsule.   This normally happens in the final stage of the approach to Venus and Venera 8's descent was on July 22.   One would expect that the Venera/Cosmos 382 capsule would have separated at about the same time.   Maybe the capsule separated earlier than planned?   Or maybe some other part of the spacecraft broke away?

Zak refers to objects, presumably from the Molniya-M's fourth stage, were found in New Zealand.   I assume that these are what Geoff Perry referred to as the "Ashburton balls" at the time.
I've always been crazy but it's kept me from going insane - WJ.

Offline gwiz

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 607
  • Cornwall
  • Liked: 148
  • Likes Given: 31
I note that Anatoly Zak says "With less degree of certainty, it can be speculated that the Venus lander is still attached to the main probe while its upper stage is not" (my own emphasis).
If the capsule separated, where is it?  It must have a higher ballistic coefficient than the main probe and photo shows that the probe is still in orbit as 1972-023E, so the capsule should be as well.  Whatever separated in June 1972 and took over the 1972-023A designation had a lower ballistic coefficient than 1972-023E, as shown by its much more rapid decay rate.

Offline Alter Sachse

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2803
  • Near Heidelberg
  • Liked: 1826
  • Likes Given: 2340
I want to quote Spaceflight vol. 44 (September 2002):
"In early June 2002 the Action Report issued by the NASA Goddard Space Flight Centers
Orbit lnformation Group included a change-of-name for the object catalogued as 1972-
023E. It had previously been designated simply as "debris" but the amendment renamed it as
"Cosmos 482 Descent craft"."
....
"The object catalogued as 1972-23E was not catalogued until about June 29, 1972,..."

One day you're a hero  next day you're a clown  there's nothing that is in between
        Jeff Lynne - "21century man"

Offline Thomas Dorman

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 157
  • Zab Oklahoma
  • Liked: 113
  • Likes Given: 7
http://www.russianspaceweb.com/venera72_kosmos482.html
Made a written proposal to the  Tira radar staff in Germany  to image Cosmos 482 before it decays back in March 2018 to see if they could tell how much of this spacecraft actually is intact  and the proposal was excepted but have heard nothing since.  Guess they are waiting until it decays well below 200 Kms.
« Last Edit: 10/06/2018 03:21 pm by Thomas Dorman »

Offline Alter Sachse

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2803
  • Near Heidelberg
  • Liked: 1826
  • Likes Given: 2340
1972-023E
(2018 July 09)
52.05° 112.39min 202-2471 km
2018 Oct  01
52.06° 112.17min 202-2451 km
One day you're a hero  next day you're a clown  there's nothing that is in between
        Jeff Lynne - "21century man"

Offline Alter Sachse

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2803
  • Near Heidelberg
  • Liked: 1826
  • Likes Given: 2340
1972-023E
(2018 July 09)
52.05° 112.39min 202-2471 km
2018 Oct  01
52.06° 112.17min 202-2451 km
2019 Feb 20
52.06° 111.66min 203-2403 km
One day you're a hero  next day you're a clown  there's nothing that is in between
        Jeff Lynne - "21century man"

Offline high road

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
  • Europe
  • Liked: 839
  • Likes Given: 152
This post made me aware of the Venus landers which I didn't even know existed.  Amazing!  They had to make machinery at earth temperatures that would work after they had been heated up to hundreds of degrees celcius, causing the metals to expand.  I thought that the technology to put a machine on the surface of Venus was decades in the future but it was actually decades in the past.

http://mentallandscape.com/C_CatalogVenus.htm
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera09_Processed.jpg
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera10_Processed.jpg
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera13_Camera1.jpg
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera13_Camera2.jpg
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera14_Camera1.jpg
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera14_Camera2.jpg

Cosmos 482 burnt down 1981 May 5 in the earth's atmosphere.
The object in Earth orbit is probably the landing capsule, which was separated 1972 July 29.

If it is the landing capsule I wonder if it'll make it to the surface in one piece given it was meant to survive the conditions on Venus. Not that it will be found.

Actually, it wasn't built to survive the conditions of Venus. They designed it for the tropical yet earthlike planet they thought Venus was. Only when the first measurements came back, did they realize how hostile Venus really is. The fact that the probes survived as long as they did is all due to Russian overengineering. The following Venera and Vega probes used the same basic design. A lander designed for Venusian conditions would likely be able to last considerably longer. How useful it would be is another matter, as the instrument package is the most sensitive part.
« Last Edit: 02/27/2019 08:01 pm by high road »

Online daedalus1

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1174
  • uk
  • Liked: 605
  • Likes Given: 0
Actually they reengineered the Landers after the U.S. Mariner spacecraft indicated that the conditions on the surface was unbelievably extreme. But still under estimated the real conditions.

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15121
  • UK
  • Liked: 4374
  • Likes Given: 220
As to the thread title it is but not yet. By the way Thomas Dorman himself has commented himself under the article.

No, the failed Venus lander from Kosmos 482 is not about to come down yet

Quote
It concerned an unusual object launched 47 years ago, called the Kosmos 482 Descent Craft (1972-023E, CSpOC nr 6073). Word was that it was about to reenter into the atmosphere, maybe even this year.  But will it?  Short answer: almost certainly not.

The source of the prediction is attributed to Thomas Dorman in the Space.com article, but how the prediction was done is not clear from the news coverage. On the request of David Dickinson, who was preparing an article on the topic for Universe Today, I made my own assessment of the issue. I looked at the orbital decay of 1972-023E since 1973 and did some GMAT modelling to gain insight into how the orbital decay will develop in the future.

As I will show in this post, my modelling suggests the Kosmos 482 Descent Craft is not to come down yet for several years.
« Last Edit: 03/23/2019 07:13 pm by Star One »

Offline SnowyOwl

  • Member
  • Posts: 77
  • Liked: 97
  • Likes Given: 82
https://t.me/kiam_ison_network/217
Quote
Spaceship of the advanced ancient civilization is about to return to Earth

The descent module of the Venera 8 probe unlucky backup -- object 3B №671 (named "Cosmos-482") would fall to Earth in early May, after spending half a century in the orbit.

Launched in 1972, the spherical capsule today rotates in an orbit with 52 degrees inclination, an apogee of 393 kilometers and a low perigee of 160 kilometers, located above the Northern Hemisphere. This allows us to assume that around May 10, the object would dive into the atmosphere above our hemisphere.

Since it has been empirically established that reentry time estimation accuracy is approximately equal to one tenth of the remaining period of ballistic existence, nothing can be said definitely about the spacecraft descent area (besides that it would occur south of the 52nd parallel). Moreover, impact time and location prediction is heavily affected by solar activity variations.

It is very likely that the rugged lander, designed for a long descent into the Venus atmosphere, would reach our planet's surface intact... and even the parachute may open :)

IPM ISON experts are monitoring the uncontrolled reentry of 3B type spacecraft. The animation has been filmed on April 9 by S. Shmalts using ORI-22 telescope at the Castelgrande Observatory.
« Last Edit: 04/27/2025 11:08 am by SnowyOwl »

Offline Apollo22

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 128
  • Liked: 85
  • Likes Given: 597
Ain't that amusing ? the silly thing missed her trip to Venus but finally made it to another planet. And it could even survive its reentry, because Venus is harder than Earth.

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7372
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 11349
  • Likes Given: 51

Offline LittleBird

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1627
  • UK
  • Liked: 475
  • Likes Given: 821
Ain't that amusing ? the silly thing missed her trip to Venus but finally made it to another planet. And it could even survive its reentry, because Venus is harder than Earth.

“ We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time.”

—-TS Eliot, “Little Gidding”

Offline KWC

  • Member
  • Posts: 41
  • USA
  • Liked: 36
  • Likes Given: 68
Upon hearing about this probe, I couldn't help but think about the line from 'The Martian' when Mark Watney is criticizing one of commander Lewis' crummy TV shows. He thinks it's ridiculous that a Russian Venus probe would land on the wrong planet by mistake and attack random people... but apparently he was at least partially incorrect.
So this is how other people put stuff at the bottom of their posts!

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 41094
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 27105
  • Likes Given: 12771
Ain't that amusing ? the silly thing missed her trip to Venus but finally made it to another planet. And it could even survive its reentry, because Venus is harder than Earth.
But the descent rate may be higher because earth atmosphere is thinner.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0


Online Hobbes-22

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1018
  • Acme Engineering
    • Acme Engineering
  • Liked: 707
  • Likes Given: 595
Ain't that amusing ? the silly thing missed her trip to Venus but finally made it to another planet. And it could even survive its reentry, because Venus is harder than Earth.
But the descent rate may be higher because earth atmosphere is thinner.

The descent rate will be a lot higher, so the thing is likely to impact at high speed and get wrecked.

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7372
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 11349
  • Likes Given: 51
Ain't that amusing ? the silly thing missed her trip to Venus but finally made it to another planet. And it could even survive its reentry, because Venus is harder than Earth.
But the descent rate may be higher because earth atmosphere is thinner.

The descent rate will be a lot higher, so the thing is likely to impact at high speed and get wrecked.
The parachute not deploying because the batteries for any triggers will have been dead for half a century certainly won't help with survivability.

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15121
  • UK
  • Liked: 4374
  • Likes Given: 220
Ain't that amusing ? the silly thing missed her trip to Venus but finally made it to another planet. And it could even survive its reentry, because Venus is harder than Earth.
But the descent rate may be higher because earth atmosphere is thinner.

The descent rate will be a lot higher, so the thing is likely to impact at high speed and get wrecked.
The parachute not deploying because the batteries for any triggers will have been dead for half a century certainly won't help with survivability.
Be funny after saying all this if they did work by some miracle.

If it did somehow survive touchdown on land and not the sea, would it immediately have to be handed over to Russia as it remains their property?

Online litton4

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 867
  • Liked: 620
  • Likes Given: 252
Upon hearing about this probe, I couldn't help but think about the line from 'The Martian' when Mark Watney is criticizing one of commander Lewis' crummy TV shows. He thinks it's ridiculous that a Russian Venus probe would land on the wrong planet by mistake and attack random people... but apparently he was at least partially incorrect.

"The Six Million Dollar Man" - I loved that episode and the followup! Yes, it got 2 episodes!
Dave Condliffe

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15121
  • UK
  • Liked: 4374
  • Likes Given: 220
Scott Manley’s just put out a video on this topic:


Offline Narnianknight

  • Member
  • Posts: 85
  • Ohio
  • Liked: 68
  • Likes Given: 329
Ain't that amusing ? the silly thing missed her trip to Venus but finally made it to another planet. And it could even survive its reentry, because Venus is harder than Earth.
But the descent rate may be higher because earth atmosphere is thinner.

The descent rate will be a lot higher, so the thing is likely to impact at high speed and get wrecked.
The parachute not deploying because the batteries for any triggers will have been dead for half a century certainly won't help with survivability.
Be funny after saying all this if they did work by some miracle.

If it did somehow survive touchdown on land and not the sea, would it immediately have to be handed over to Russia as it remains their property?

It belonged to the USSR, which no longer exists. Free game I say.

Offline laszlo

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1324
  • Liked: 1798
  • Likes Given: 910
International law says that it belongs to the successor state, assuming all the salvage conditions are resolved.

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15121
  • UK
  • Liked: 4374
  • Likes Given: 220
International law says that it belongs to the successor state, assuming all the salvage conditions are resolved.
That’s what I thought. Going by that Scott Manley video it sounds like even without a parachute it might have more chance of surviving intact if it hit the ocean rather than land.

Offline KWC

  • Member
  • Posts: 41
  • USA
  • Liked: 36
  • Likes Given: 68
Do we actually know when and where it's coming down? All the sources I have found say it's up in the air (no pun intended), but surely it has about a 70% chance of hitting some ocean somewhere.
So this is how other people put stuff at the bottom of their posts!

Online daedalus1

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1174
  • uk
  • Liked: 605
  • Likes Given: 0
Anywhere between 51°N and 51°S.

Online StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4350
  • UK
  • Liked: 6308
  • Likes Given: 937
Do we actually know when and where it's coming down? All the sources I have found say it's up in the air (no pun intended), but surely it has about a 70% chance of hitting some ocean somewhere.

Marco Langbroek's blog is tracking it.

Quote
Update Date   Predicted Re-entry   Uncertainty
Apr 30, 8:00 UTC   10 May 2025, 06:01 UTC   ± 2.8 days
May 2, 20:20 UTC11 May 2025, 03:41 UTC± 2.2 days
May 4, 13:30 UTC10 May 2025, 23:06 UTC± 1.8 days
May 5, 8:50 UTC10 May 2025, 19:05 UTC± 1.5 days
May 6, 12:50 UTC10 May 2025, 8:37 UTC± 1.0 days
May 7, 8:50 UTC10 May 2025, 7:51 UTC± 20.6 hr
May 8, 6:20 UTC10 May 2025, 7:34 UTC± 14.6 hr
May 9, 16:20 UTC10 May 2025, 6:30 UTC± 4.1 hr
May 10, 05:40 UTC10 May 2025, 6:39 UTC± 1.5 hr
« Last Edit: 05/10/2025 07:39 am by StraumliBlight »

Offline SnowyOwl

  • Member
  • Posts: 77
  • Liked: 97
  • Likes Given: 82
https://x.com/ralfvandebergh/status/1917618156589248616
Quote
New imagery of 1972 launched intended #Venera probe to visit #Venus but that is stuck in Earth orbit for 53 years, likely confirms that some structure is connected to the capsule. Not impossible that it's the parachute, but this is still speculation!

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15121
  • UK
  • Liked: 4374
  • Likes Given: 220
The Story Of Kosmos 482, The Soviet Spaceship About To Crash To Earth

Quote
Part of the Kosmos 482 spacecraft – a handful of round titanium pressure vessels, which may have been part of rocket engines, rained down on New Zealand a few days later, causing quite a stir and making into a New Zealand government report on UFOs which was released in 2011.



Quote
New Zealand, farmer Dennis O’Sullivan was just 17 years old when he discovered one of the spheres in his turnip field.

“I saw this mound in the paddock, and I thought it was a dead sheep,” he told The Press decades later. “I went closer, and there was this metal ball lying there next to a bit of a hollow about three feet away.” It turned out to be a titanium alloy sphere, marked with Russian labels. O’Sullivan hefted the 30 pound sphere and carried in his lap on the drive back to the farmhouse to call the police.

At least one of the spheres spent the night in jail after its apprehension by local police. John Lindores, who found the sphere on his property, told The Press the police “took it to Ashburton Jail and locked it up for the night.”



Quote
Under international treaty – signed not long before Kosmos 482’s ill-fated launch, at that – the spheres still belonged to the Soviet Union and should have been returned. But the USSR disavowed all knowledge of the spaceship parts scattered across Ashburton and the surrounding area. That left them as bizarre souvenirs for the stunned Kiwis on whose property they’d landed. Lindores loaned his, permanently, to the Ashburton Aviation Museum. O’Sullivan has kept his “in a corner of his lounge” for the last 53 years, after a failed attempt to sell it on eBay.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kionasmith/2025/05/07/the-story-of-kosmos-482-the-soviet-spaceship-about-to-crash-to-earth/

Offline Apollo22

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 128
  • Liked: 85
  • Likes Given: 597
Wait, part of Kosmos 482 rained on New Zealand in the past ? imagine, if the present one fell on New Zealand too.  :o

Offline ralfvandebergh

New images set
Cosmos-482 observations 13 year time span. The structure in Cosmos-482 is unlike anything I have seen in 15 year sat imaging. I've seen a lot of seeing and other effects, but this looks really like something else. Interestingly, Cosmos44 is also a historic object, from a 1964 launch! It was the rocket from the 3th Russian experimental weather satellite. The second images set shows a comparison to a first gen Starlink satellite that is 130 km further away. This gives some size indication. Starlink sat bus is approx. 1.3 x 2.7 meters (according to SpaceX specifications).

In the course of the years when working on this project, I gathered a lot of information on what may happened back then:

From my old website:

After the launch, five pieces of Cosmos 482 were found in Earth orbit, the spacecraft Cosmos 482 itself (1972-023A), the Molniya rocket 3rd stage or SL-6 Blok I (1972-023B) the SL-6 PLATFORM (1972-023C), the Molniya rocket 4th stage or SL-6 Blok-NVL (1972-023D), and a debris item (1972-023E). Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics astronomer Jonathan McDowell comments on object C cataloged as PLATFORM: 'When the Soviets first started using the parking orbit technique in 1961, the US thought this object, the BOZ, was an orbiting platform from which the 4th stage was 'launched' - I guess it's not totally wrong to look at it that way'.

The pieces B and C already reentered on respectively April 1 and April 2, 1972, shortly after launch. Fragment D (with RCS of 8,75) would have been the Block-NVL upper stage and reentered on February 20, 1983. Object A, which is believed to be the original Cosmos 482 (Venera) spacecraft bus, was in an original orbit of 205 x 9800 kilometers and decayed already on May 5, 1981. According to Russianspaceweb, the debris cataloged as object E separated from Cosmos 482 (object A) late June 1972 and thus objects A and E had a similar initial elliptical orbit.

The debris item E is still in orbit and this is the object that I photographed in recent years with the telescope. This object is currently in an orbit of (at the time this was written) 203 x 2406 kilometers (the orbit lowered with 7394 kilometers since 1972) and would have - according to available data - a radar cross section (RCS) of only 0,72 square meters. The big difference in RCS compared to the in 1981 decayed piece - which would have been 12,6 square meters - suggest that the already decayed item was the actual spacecraft bus and that Cosmos 482E (object E), the only remaining item from the launch, is only a smaller element of the spacecraft, according to experts the descent craft (the lander). Also the full-illumination brightness at perigee of -0,1 mag for the decayed piece compared to 2,3 mag for the remaining piece, strengthen these suspicions. There are also visual observation reports from the 1970's that confirm that Cosmos 482A (object A) was a bright object in the night sky.

Ralf Vandebergh

https://satellite-imaging.jouwweb.nl/selected-project-samples-best-works
« Last Edit: 05/08/2025 12:50 am by ralfvandebergh »

Offline eeergo

Latest reentry predictions from Langbroek https://sattrackcam.blogspot.com/2025/04/kosmos-842-descent-craft-reentry.html:

--------------------------------------------------------------------
TUDAT REENTRY FORECAST EVOLUTION for KOSMOS 482 Descent Craft
M. Langbroek & D. Dirkx, Delft University of Technology

Date/times in UTC

REFERENCE ORBIT    ORBIT EPOCH      REENTRY FORECAST   +/-
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
15-11-2024 05:43   24320.23870400   05-05-2025 23:33   42.9 days
01-12-2024 05:32   24336.23116452   08-05-2025 09:09   39.5 days
15-12-2024 18:58   24350.79080401   07-05-2025 11:51   35.7 days
01-01-2025 11:20   25001.47260254   09-05-2025 07:20   32.0 days
15-01-2025 03:23   25015.14140884   10-05-2025 20:40   28.9 days
02-02-2025 08:54   25033.37115746   13-05-2025 17:52   25.1 days
15-02-2025 03:20   25046.13941015   11-05-2025 09:52   21.3 days
01-03-2025 00:07   25060.00535989   10-05-2025 17:51   17.7 days
15-03-2025 05:56   25074.24770046   10-05-2025 07:57   14.0 days
30-03-2025 12:05   25089.50360681   09-05-2025 21:11   10.1 days
13-04-2025 21:32   25103.89775709   09-05-2025 22:01    6.5 days
20-04-2025 01:39   25110.06916305   09-05-2025 11:31    4.9 days
22-04-2025 21:24   25112.89204293   09-05-2025 12:48    4.2 days
23-04-2025 22:57   25113.95657237   09-05-2025 19:43    4.0 days
27-04-2025 00:27   25117.01893077   10-05-2025 04:52    3.3 days
28-04-2025 00:24   25118.01685903   10-05-2025 06:33    3.1 days
28-04-2025 22:50   25118.95143786   10-05-2025 06:01    2.8 days
01-05-2025 20:57   25121.87323063   10-05-2025 14:30    2.2 days
02-05-2025 09:12   25122.38386703   11-05-2025 02:36    2.2 days
02-05-2025 12:16   25122.51167762   11-05-2025 03:41    2.2 days
02-05-2025 17:52   25122.74476620   11-05-2025 06:50    2.1 days
03-05-2025 18:07   25123.75533175   10-05-2025 20:48    1.8 days
03-05-2025 21:05   25123.87876286   10-05-2025 23:06    1.8 days
04-05-2025 20:47   25124.86648285   10-05-2025 19:05    1.5 days
05-05-2025 20:29   25125.85361170   10-05-2025 07:26    1.1 days
06-05-2025 09:39   25126.40254557   10-05-2025 08:37    1.0 day
06-05-2025 21:26   25126.89335737   10-05-2025 07:51   20.6 hr
07-05-2025 21:00   25127.87559184   10-05-2025 07:34   14.6 hr   *

Coming down late tomorrow or more likely on Saturday.
-DaviD-

Offline jacqmans

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22348
  • Houten, The Netherlands
  • Liked: 9306
  • Likes Given: 341
On 10 May, an uncontrolled reentry will take place of the so-called Cosmos-482 descent craft, a Soviet Venera landing capsule that launched 53 years ago.

This post provides live updates from ESA’s Space Debris Office on the atmospheric reentry of the Cosmos-482 descent craft. New updates will be added at the top of this page, so check back for the latest.

On 10 May, an uncontrolled reentry will take place of the so-called Cosmos-482 descent craft, a Soviet Venera landing capsule that launched 53 years ago. It was meant to land on Venus, but its launcher never escaped Earth’s gravity. Now, the descent craft will come down at a point between 52 degrees north and south of the equator. As the reentry comes closer, the predictions will become more precise in the updates directly below (last to first).

https://blogs.esa.int/rocketscience/2025/05/07/reentry-prediction-soviet-era-venera-venus-lander-cosmos-482-descent-craft/
Jacques :-)

Offline eeergo

New observations appear to show no signs of extended objects protruding from the main Kosmos 482 body (i.e. quite likely no ejected parachute - wonder how unlikely it would be for a mechanical pressure sensor, if that's what the Veneras used for parachute deployment, to work after all these years of exposure to space, let alone the condition of said putative folded chute)

https://app.astrobin.com/i/94h7sy
-DaviD-

Online StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4350
  • UK
  • Liked: 6308
  • Likes Given: 937
EU SST closely monitors upcoming re-entry of space object Cosmos-482 Descent Craft [May 9, 07:00 UTC]

Quote
Yellow lines: ground track before the centre of the re-entry window.
Green lines: ground track after the centre of the re-entry window.
Red: overflights inside European countries and overseas territories.

Note: the possible re-entry locations lie anywhere along the yellow and green lines. The re-entry point is considered to be at an altitude of 80 km.

Also here's the TUDAT forecast. [May 9, 16:20 UTC]

Quote
Of course, at this point the uncertainty in the forecast is still +/- 4 hours. Yet, the uncertainty window has now decreased to the point that we can rule out certain parts of the world: Africa, with the exception of the extreme NW and NE parts, is safe. So is Japan, and the NW part of the USA.

The map below gives the trajectory of the object over the current uncertainty window of the TUDAT reentry forecast (red dots are cities with over 1 million inhabitants, between latitude 52 N and 52 S). The spacecraft can reenter anywhere along the blue line:
« Last Edit: 05/09/2025 04:49 pm by StraumliBlight »

Offline ChrisC

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2905
  • Atlanta GA USA
  • Liked: 2717
  • Likes Given: 2869
Quote
Our latest TUDAT #reentry forecast for the #Kosmos 482 Descent Craft:
10 May 6:30 +/- 4.1h UTC
Link to blogpost with details:
https://sattrackcam.blogspot.com/2025/04/kosmos-842-descent-craft-reentry.html
The uncertainty has now become small enought to exclude certain areas.
Japan, the NW of the USA, and most of Africa (except extreme NW and NE) are now safe.
The spacecraft can come down anywhere on the blue lines in the map:
round-up of current forecasts from various sources:
TUDAT: 10 May 06:30 ± 4.1 hr UTC.
CSpOC TIP: 10 May  05:52 ± 6.1 hr UTC
ESA:  10 May  06:00 ± 4.8 hr UTC
EU-SST: 10 May  06:07 ± 4.8 hr UTC
Aerospace Corp: 10 May  05:54 ± 4.0 hr UTC

https://twitter.com/Marco_Langbroek/status/1920882307902177339
PSA #1: Suppress forum auto-embed of Youtube videos by deleting leading 'www.' (four char) in YT URL; useful when linking text to YT, or to avoid bloat.
PSA #2:  Use Google's "site:" operator to quickly find threads on NSF; google those three words for guidance  *** two more tips in profile ***

Online StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4350
  • UK
  • Liked: 6308
  • Likes Given: 937
https://twitter.com/planet4589/status/1921091107607158972

Quote
Kosmos-428-SA has most likely reentered by now. Have not heard any  reports of observations. Space Force will at some point issue a reentry  estimate - nothing yet.

Correction - there appears to be an observation from Peru around 0540 - 0545 UTC. So had not reentered prior to that.

Reentry prediction Soviet-era Venera Venus lander

Quote
Status 10 May 08:35 CEST

The descent craft was seen by radar systems over Germany at approximately 04:30 UTC and 06:04 UTC, corresponding to 06:30 CEST and 08:04 CEST, respectively. There is no further update on the estimated reentry window as we are now roughly in the centre, corresponding to the red dot labeled COIW (centre of impact window) in the ground track track chart below.

https://twitter.com/Marco_Langbroek/status/1921074774161195477

Quote
Latest TU Delft TUDAT #reentry forecast for the #Kosmos Descent Craft: 10 May 6:39 +- 1.5 h UTC

SatTrackCam Leiden [May 10, 05:40 UTC]

Quote
A roundup of current reentry forecasts from various sources (each running their own reentry model) retrieved 10 May 6:15 UTC:

TUDAT10 May06:39± 1.5 hr UTC
CSpOC TIP10 May05:32± 1.0 hr UTC
ESA's Space Debris Office   10 May   06:00   ± 2.4 hr UTC   
EU-SST10 May05:50± 6.1 hr UTC
Aerospace Corp10 May06:12± 3.0 hr UTC

EDIT: Seems to have reentered.

Quote
Status 10 May 09:56 CEST

As the descent craft was not spotted by radar over Germany at the expected 07:32 UTC / 09:32 CEST pass, it is most likely that the reentry has already occurred.
« Last Edit: 05/10/2025 08:30 am by StraumliBlight »

Offline eeergo

Seems to have been observed still in orbit when overflying Peru, so it must have reentered after that (Atlantic, Central Europe, Central Asia, India-Pakistan :\ ...)


EDIT: also over Germany:
« Last Edit: 05/10/2025 08:17 am by eeergo »
-DaviD-

Offline TFR88

  • Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Germany
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
According to https://blogs.esa.int/rocketscience/2025/05/07/reentry-prediction-soviet-era-venera-venus-lander-cosmos-482-descent-craft/ :

Status 10 May 09:56 CEST

As the descent craft was not spotted by radar over Germany at the expected 07:32 UTC / 09:32 CEST pass, it is most likely that the reentry has already occurred.

Offline Alter Sachse

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2803
  • Near Heidelberg
  • Liked: 1826
  • Likes Given: 2340
Roscosmos:
The device “Cosmos-482” descended from orbit and fell into the ocean

Launched in 1972, the spacecraft "Cosmos-482" ceased to exist, descending from orbit and falling in the Indian Ocean

The convergence of the device was controlled by the means of the Automated Warning System of Danger Situations in Near-Earth Space.

In accordance with the calculations of specialists of JSC "TSNIIMash" (part of "Roscosmos"), the device entered the dense layers of the atmosphere at 9:24 Moscow time 560 km west of the island of Middle Andaman and fell in the Indian Ocean west of Jakarta.

The device was launched in the spring of 1972 to study Venus, but due to a malfunction of the upper stage remained in the high elliptical orbit of the Earth, gradually approaching the planet.
One day you're a hero  next day you're a clown  there's nothing that is in between
        Jeff Lynne - "21century man"

Offline Apollo22

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 128
  • Liked: 85
  • Likes Given: 597
So, approximately this ?

https://www.distance.to/-8.450638800331001,104.1174950225494/12.254127737657381,91.19320844936874

Cosmos 482 was Venera 8 twin sister, itself the second Venera lander to survive descent up to touchdown; after Venera 7 in 1970. Hence, those capsules had been reinforced to survive up to the surface.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venera_8
« Last Edit: 05/10/2025 11:45 am by Apollo22 »


Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17811
  • Liked: 10646
  • Likes Given: 2

Online StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4350
  • UK
  • Liked: 6308
  • Likes Given: 937
https://twitter.com/esaoperations/status/1922217351652512221

Reentry prediction Soviet-era Venera Venus lander (Cosmos-482 descent craft) [May 13 update]

Quote
On 10 May 2025, an uncontrolled reentry took place of the Cosmos-482 descent craft, a Venera landing capsule that launched 53 years earlier. It was meant to land on Venus, but its launcher never escaped Earth’s gravity.

The Soviet-era object was last spotted over Germany at 08:04 CEST on 10 May by our colleagues at Fraunhofer FHR as it passed through the sky over their antenna. Because the descent craft was not spotted one orbit later, at the expected 09:32 CEST pass, the reentry can be assumed to have occurred between these two times.

A precise time and location of its reentry have so far not been identified. We have not received any reports on direct visual observations of the final reentry or of any impacts on ground.

This GIF combines images of Cosmos-482 tumbling through space on Thursday 8 May, about 2 days before reentry. The overlay image in the GIF helps to identify the orientation and what is reflected in the radar image.

The images were captured by the Tracking and Imaging Radar (TIRA) at the Fraunhofer Institute for High Frequency Physics and Radar Techniques FHR in Germany. The TIRA-acquired radar tracks helped to improve the knowledge of its orbit and finetune our reentry predictions.

Offline ralfvandebergh

#Cosmos482 2024-07-07 image analyses: (Please enlarge images, otherwise analyses can not well be displayed). Some of the detailed video analyses I did (First 2 image sets) of my last imaging session from July 2024 show why I strongly think that the - to the landing capsule visible attached structure - must be a real detail (physical). The thin sharp structure pops up only in good moments of seeing. The good seeing moment starts from frame 3. Frame 1 & 2 are blurred by seeing. Other video parts from this session but also from the earlier sessions in 2014 and 2011 show the same analyses results.

Right: To indicate how imaging artifacts in high-res satellite imaging look: Some examples of motion (tracking) and seeing artifacts from Cosmos-482 imaging sessions.

Full quality version: https://spaceweathergallery2.com/submissions/pics/r/Ralf-Vandebergh-Cosmos482_20240707_imageanalyses1_1748090259.png


Ralf Vandebergh

https://x.com/@ralfvandebergh

https://satellite-imaging.jouwweb.nl/selected-project-samples-best-works


« Last Edit: 07/25/2025 01:26 pm by ralfvandebergh »

Offline ralfvandebergh

Cosmos-482 image analyses on signal consistency.
Please enlarge image - click image for full quality, otherwise analyses can not be displayed well.

Appearance of detail Cosmos-482 (upper images) compared to artificial structures caused by seeing effects (lower images). The Cosmos-482 images (upper images) show a consistent structure attached to the bright core (the capsule). Where the poor seeing satellite image examples (lower images) show a different structure in each frame. This shows what the seeing does with a small image. There is no consistency.

At the same time, the visible consistent detail in the Cosmos-482 images show small variations caused by the seeing, this is what the seeing does with real physical structures: the same effects as on a small planet detail captured on video through a telescope. Each frame show a slightly different version of the detail in which the detail itself is consistent.

All analysis results point at a physical (real) existance of an attached structure to Cosmos-482 descent craft.

Full quality version:
https://spaceweathergallery2.com/submissions/pics/r/Ralf-Vandebergh-Cosmos482_20240707_imageanalyses_consistency_tw_1748867621.png


Ralf Vandebergh

https://x.com/@ralfvandebergh

https://satellite-imaging.jouwweb.nl/selected-project-samples-best-works
« Last Edit: 07/03/2025 12:07 pm by ralfvandebergh »

Offline ralfvandebergh

Improved processing of the 2024-07-07, 10 seconds interval observation.

« Last Edit: 06/04/2025 11:22 am by ralfvandebergh »

Offline ralfvandebergh

Further image analyses of the July 24, 2024 Cosmos-482 images pointed out that the attached detail - which potentionally could have been the parachute - was actually curved and left the descent craft from a certain position. This is visible in multiple frames. An extraordinary and one of a kind observation. I think it's important that all possible data is gathered from these rare observations, even when the craft is already down for more then a month. Good chance we will never observe anything like this again..

Ralf Vandebergh

https://x.com/@ralfvandebergh

https://satellite-imaging.jouwweb.nl/selected-project-samples-best-works
« Last Edit: 08/01/2025 12:42 pm by ralfvandebergh »

Offline Apollo22

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 128
  • Liked: 85
  • Likes Given: 597
Thank you for the good work. I suppose we still don't know where exactly did it came down, and probably never will ? that's frustrating.
« Last Edit: 06/26/2025 09:22 am by Apollo22 »

Offline ralfvandebergh

Depends on how you look at it; frustrating - or a probably never resolved mystery that keeps some excitement about the object.

I'm glad with that July 2024 session which provided the needed certainty about the data captured in the earlier sessions. In professional work I learned that quantity makes quality in data gathering. The more you are able to compare data the more accurate that data and the more accurate the analyses.

I still believe in that parachute possibility; Measured from the original frames and taking into account the atmospheric smearing and overexposure of the capsule - the length of the attachment matches well with the parachute/capsule ratio, the curved shape could be explained by forces. It's clearly something that has a weak structure and is influenced by movement. According to different sources, an explosion occured following the trans-Venus injection burn, possibly something damaged the system and the parachute came out. That's what I think, but we probably never will know for sure.

Only thing that I know sure is that that attached detail it is a physical, existing thing.

Ralf

« Last Edit: 06/27/2025 04:02 pm by ralfvandebergh »

Offline ralfvandebergh

Some special Cosmos-482 image processings from the session on June 26, 2014. Images processsed in 2019 but never published at the time because I was not sure about the 'tail' detail - the elongated detail that seems attached to the descent craft. But the confirmation of this observation (and earlier ones in 2011) came finally in 2024 (see the previous analyses).

At the same time I found back the pass data from this 2014 session so I put it on the images. With a range of 272 km, this is the closest observation of the object I did. To get any successful high-resolution images, you had to wait for the perigee - or close to perigee - passes. With the strongly elliptical orbit of Cosmos-482, combined to all the other factors required for successful imagery, it could take years until you had another usable observing opportunity.


Ralf Vandebergh

https://satellite-imaging.jouwweb.nl/selected-project-samples-best-works
« Last Edit: 08/05/2025 05:22 pm by ralfvandebergh »

Offline ralfvandebergh

Comment on ''Battery-lifetime for parachute deployment - statement''

An often heard comment that is widely spread on the internet: 'Unlikely that the battery for the parachute deployment can work after so many years'. This idea must have been generated by someone and then repeated by others.

First, I didn't think much about it as well, because it sounds like a fair idea to explain why the chute-deployment idea would be unlikely. However, lately I got into the matter again and suddenly realized that this comment actually makes not any sense.

Think about it: You have a spacecraft that is in orbit for more then 50 years. I have a hard time to understand how can be assumed that - if a parachute deployed - it deployed just recently? In fact, if you look at the data I captured, the elongated detail was already there in the earliest observations, in 2011 and 2014. So it's fair to assume that it already was there for a much longer time, perhaps (and that would not be very unlikely) even since the separation event of the capsule from the main spacecraft, after the explosion following the trans-Venus injection burn in 1972.

Some people think it's about claiming things, it's not. Not how it works. Facts come to you, I mean, you don't look for parachutes in your images but facts encounter you. I explain: If you first observe something that looks special you are like: Oh nice, interesting. But you don't think much about what it could be because you have no clue. If you observe the same detail 3 years later again, you think: interesting, but you still have not enough comparison. However, If you observe exact the same detail 10 years later again, with 10 years more experience, you start to think: Maybe I have captured something interesting here.

Some people may think: Why doing so much efforts about an object that is already down? It's about more then just an old spacecraft, this is a lesson about how to handle data and science journalism. Observing data must always be analyzed properly, but the same goes for expert-opinions that are copied and spread by media. These could be wrong as well. If we want to do proper science, we can not just spread an opinion without looking at data and history very closely. Although for newspapers and any like these I also realize that there is no time to go through all of this.

Ralf Vandebergh

https://satellite-imaging.jouwweb.nl/selected-project-samples-best-works
« Last Edit: 08/16/2025 02:36 pm by ralfvandebergh »

Offline ralfvandebergh

It's not given much thought, but it's actually quite special to have these external images of a Venera lander(Cosmos-482 captured in june 2014 in orbit around the Earth), as the capsule would have been seen by an imaginary person on the Venusian surface during its descent. These must be the only images showing a Venera landing capsule from outside in space (apart from onboard cameras). If this failed mission hadn't happened, these kinds of images would never have existed, because the capsule wouldn't have remained in orbit for 53 years, making it possible to photograph it from Earth with current technology.

In any case, I can't help but feel that we can even see a little of the capsule's shape in these images...

Ralf Vandebergh

https://satellite-imaging.jouwweb.nl/selected-project-samples-best-works
« Last Edit: 11/11/2025 11:31 am by ralfvandebergh »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0