Author Topic: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)  (Read 857276 times)

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39867
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25923
  • Likes Given: 12334
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #400 on: 03/20/2012 05:10 pm »
...
(The slashes indicate the end-points of my personal range of reactions to Musk's claims :-) )
;D
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline oiorionsbelt

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1768
  • Liked: 1192
  • Likes Given: 2694
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #401 on: 03/20/2012 08:22 pm »

Elon, "Mars is great. It's a bit of a fixer upper"

Offline Karloss12

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 300
  • Liked: 173
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #402 on: 03/20/2012 08:42 pm »
Hadn't seen this posted before. BBC interview with Elon. Of particular interest is the 20-minute audio interview. Elon gives some more details on the "move-to-mars" plan/fantasy, and the interviewer does a pretty good job of not getting blown over by Elon's vision/bluster.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17439490

paraphrased quote: "we'll reveal more details about that plan later this year"

That'll be fascinating/amusing.

-Jeff

(The slashes indicate the end-points of my personal range of reactions to Musk's claims :-) )


He says the first return trip to the surface of mars will be within 10 to 15 years.  And 10 years later a return ticket would cost $500k.

He stresses that it absolutely depends on the hardware being completely and rapidly reusable for thousands of times.  And that the mars lander is refueled on the surface of mars.

When it comes down to it the only load the capsule takes is internal pressure.  Passenger aircraft are far more complex structures.  Even jet engines are far more complex then rockets when in service.

He has basically calculated how much it costs to get the weight of a person, food and mars landing fuel to leave earths orbit.  Add a 5% profit margin and there you are.  Doesn't take rocket scientist to make that calculation.

His solution to shielding the space craft from solar storms is to point a column of water at the sun....damn, I wish I thought of that one. :-)
« Last Edit: 03/20/2012 08:44 pm by Karloss12 »

Offline grdja

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 323
  • Liked: 33
  • Likes Given: 13
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #403 on: 03/20/2012 10:09 pm »
Water shields have been suggested often, but the one he suggests only shields from the sun, and there is a lot of talk that cosmic rays are also a significant risk.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39867
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25923
  • Likes Given: 12334
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #404 on: 03/20/2012 10:44 pm »
Water shields have been suggested often, but the one he suggests only shields from the sun, and there is a lot of talk that cosmic rays are also a significant risk.
No, it's really not that much of a risk, not if you're staying on Mars and only need the 6 month trip to get there... That's about the same radiation dose as a year on ISS (several Russian astronauts and even American astronauts have spent that much time in space). We're talking about a couple percent increase in cancer risk, not that great and not even over the (somewhat arbitrary) astronaut limit. The rest of the risks on the trip is a far greater risk to life than the slight cancer risk from GCRs.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9275
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4499
  • Likes Given: 1133
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #405 on: 03/20/2012 10:52 pm »
That's the best case scenario, yes.

The annual GCR dose equivalent in free space during solar minimum is estimated to be 120 cSv.

Free space GCR dose estimate: 3284 uSv/day (solar minimum)  1095 uSv/day (solar maximum)
LEO average: 500 uSv/day which includes 300 uSv/day from GCR
LEO during solar minimum:  650 uSv/day

I don't think it would have any effect on an exploration mission, but I expect fertility rates will be lower on Mars :)
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline manboy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
  • Texas, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 134
  • Likes Given: 544
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #406 on: 03/20/2012 10:53 pm »
So do we know who SpaceX plans to contract for the pressure suits (David Clark, ILC Dover, Orbital Outfitters...)?
"Cheese has been sent into space before. But the same cheese has never been sent into space twice." - StephenB

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39867
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25923
  • Likes Given: 12334
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #407 on: 03/20/2012 11:11 pm »
So do we know who SpaceX plans to contract for the pressure suits (David Clark, ILC Dover, Orbital Outfitters...)?
Good question, I think this provides something of an answer:
One of the NASA CCDev PDF's showed SpaceX's partners but they were  blacked out. Later a ppt by NASA's Maria Collura let all 9 cats out of the bag.

ILC Dover, Oceaneering International and Orbital Outfitters are three of SpaceX's partners. ILC Dover and Oceaneering are partnered in creating a suit for MPCV and Orbital Outfitters is working with XCOR on suits for Lynx II.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6637
  • Liked: 4801
  • Likes Given: 5909
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #408 on: 03/21/2012 03:55 am »
VASIMR?

SAGE III-ISS? OCO-3? PRELSE II? EuTEF-2? ;)

Yes, SAGE-III-ISS.  It is public knowledge, as can be seen in this Facebook image.  "Launch and Installation - Manifest: August 2014 (SpaceX Falcon 9 Dragon Trunk)"
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline Maciej Olesinski

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 136
  • Liked: 34
  • Likes Given: 15
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #409 on: 03/21/2012 05:40 am »
Not THAT official but said by NASA. In august there will be another Falcon 9 start.
Starts 7:30
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=16rfcTbU_D4#t=452s

Also he seems to belive strongly in SpaceX if i understand correctly.
« Last Edit: 03/21/2012 05:43 am by placydo »

Offline go4mars

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • Earth
  • Liked: 158
  • Likes Given: 3463
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #410 on: 03/21/2012 12:39 pm »
That's the best case scenario, yes.

The annual GCR dose equivalent in free space during solar minimum is estimated to be 120 cSv.

Free space GCR dose estimate: 3284 uSv/day (solar minimum)  1095 uSv/day (solar maximum)
LEO average: 500 uSv/day which includes 300 uSv/day from GCR
LEO during solar minimum:  650 uSv/day

I don't think it would have any effect on an exploration mission, but I expect fertility rates will be lower on Mars :)


So about 2-4 BED's per day (before shielding)?   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_equivalent_dose
Elasmotherium; hurlyburly Doggerlandic Jentilak steeds insouciantly gallop in viridescent taiga, eluding deluginal Burckle's abyssal excavation.

Offline manboy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
  • Texas, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 134
  • Likes Given: 544
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #411 on: 03/25/2012 05:51 am »


Talks about Super Draco. The stand they fired from recently is temporary and they're in the final stages of building a true test stand for it. "Physically, they've done a couple of iterations of their Super Draco design, optimized its performance and its five operating limits", and "now in the future its about to get even more interesting as they are actually going to start manufacturing flight-like components for their Super Draco engines". The next crew trial test will involve suit simulators and a slightly higher fidelity mock-up.
"Cheese has been sent into space before. But the same cheese has never been sent into space twice." - StephenB

Offline dcporter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
  • Liked: 275
  • Likes Given: 441
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #412 on: 03/25/2012 02:35 pm »
"flight-like?"

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39867
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25923
  • Likes Given: 12334
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #413 on: 03/25/2012 07:58 pm »
"flight-like?"
When you first develop a new rocket engine and are just examining performance and efficiency and combustion stability, etc, you don't bother spending the money and time to make it lightweight and machine out every last bit of metal that isn't necessary, etc. You use COTS valves and other components.

Flight-like means you spend effort making it lightweight and use aerospace-grade, flightweight components which are generally a lot more expensive.

It's much better to avoid wasting time on flight-like components when you're doing the earliest iterations of a rocket engine and haven't pinned everything down, yet. That's why they were already able to do several versions of SuperDraco already (and why the first tests of Merlin could occur within a year of SpaceX's founding).
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline mr. mark

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1996
  • Liked: 172
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #414 on: 03/29/2012 02:17 am »
Ok, so say I win the Mega Millions lotto and get the 500 million dollar prize. Wonder what SpaceX could accomplish with a 100 million dollar donation to manned Dragon?
« Last Edit: 03/29/2012 02:21 am by mr. mark »

Offline dcporter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
  • Liked: 275
  • Likes Given: 441
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #415 on: 03/29/2012 02:33 am »
Ok, so say I win the Mega Millions lotto and get the 500 million dollar prize. Wonder what SpaceX could accomplish with a 100 million dollar donation to manned Dragon?

I wonder this too. There are lots of rich nerds that don't want to own their own rocket company; would Musk take megakickstart donations?

Offline Lurker Steve

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1420
  • Liked: 35
  • Likes Given: 9
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #416 on: 03/29/2012 02:35 am »
Ok, so say I win the Mega Millions lotto and get the 500 million dollar prize. Wonder what SpaceX could accomplish with a 100 million dollar donation to manned Dragon?

I'm convinced that no amount of money can bring the schedule to the left. They might be ready for certification in 2017. No earlier.

If there is something that more money can buy to move the schedule to the left, speak up. Congress was willing to add more money to the original COTS funding for risk reduction activities. If there are specific tasks that should be funded, and it can be justified as something that definately removes risk from the schedule slipping even farther to the right, list them out. Put the list in front of the appropriations committee's now. Otherwise, we are just asking for more money with no plan on where it gets spent. 

Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2815
  • Liked: 819
  • Likes Given: 1303
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #417 on: 03/29/2012 02:49 am »

The annual GCR dose equivalent in free space during solar minimum is estimated to be 120 cSv.

Free space GCR dose estimate: 3284 uSv/day (solar minimum)  1095 uSv/day (solar maximum)
LEO average: 500 uSv/day which includes 300 uSv/day from GCR
LEO during solar minimum:  650 uSv/day


Where are these numbers from?

I assume all values are unshielded?

Do you have average free space values that combines solar and galactic sources?
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Offline david1971

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 257
  • Liked: 152
  • Likes Given: 17779
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #418 on: 03/29/2012 04:30 am »
Ok, so say I win the Mega Millions lotto and get the 500 million dollar prize. Wonder what SpaceX could accomplish with a 100 million dollar donation to manned Dragon?

I'd be more interested with what Bigelow would do with a spare $100M. 

OK, maybe it would end up as nothing more than mess of really cool scale models, but isn't the thinking that we already have too many LV/spacecraft candidates, but not enough places to go?
I flew on SOFIA four times.

Offline Geron

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 229
  • Liked: 60
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #419 on: 03/29/2012 05:34 am »
http://www.forbes.com/sites/hannahelliott/2012/03/26/at-home-with-elon-musk-the-soon-to-be-bachelor-billionaire/

A little bit in there on SpaceX. I hope that the launch goes well on April 30th. Seems like there is a lot of press interest in the venture.

I wonder if a paying customer would be able to take Dragon for a spin around the earth without a launch escape system?

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0