Author Topic: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)  (Read 865576 times)

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8689
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3919
  • Likes Given: 818
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #340 on: 03/16/2012 04:36 pm »
I would take that as FlightGlobal's artistic license and not based on any hard evidence from SpaceX. There have been raised eyebrows in the past about FlightGlobal's space reporting.

This alone should have raised question marks here:

"The Merlin 1D will offer up to 155,000lb (689kN) of thrust, an upgrade over the 140,000lb predecessor, the Merlin 1C"

Offline corrodedNut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • Liked: 216
  • Likes Given: 133
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #341 on: 03/16/2012 04:37 pm »
I would take that as FlightGlobal's artistic license and not based on any hard evidence from SpaceX. There have been raised eyebrows in the past about FlightGlobal's space reporting.
I'd have to agree until shown otherwise.

For instance: "The Merlin 1D will offer up to 155,000lb (689kN) of thrust, an upgrade over the 140,000lb predecessor, the Merlin 1C."

How'd they get that second number? Not much fact-checking.

Aww, beat me to it... What's the real number? 98k?
« Last Edit: 03/16/2012 04:52 pm by corrodedNut »

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8689
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3919
  • Likes Given: 818
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #342 on: 03/16/2012 04:47 pm »
What's the real number? 98k?

About 96 klbf, IIRC. The C1 demo press kit says 854 klbf total stage thrust, but cosine losses might have been factored in.


Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6662
  • Liked: 4824
  • Likes Given: 6016
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #343 on: 03/16/2012 05:00 pm »
What's the real number? 98k?

About 96 klbf, IIRC. The C1 demo press kit says 854 klbf total stage thrust, but cosine losses might have been factored in.
There are no cosine losses. There are other effects from the close proximity of the 9 engines, but they all point along the same axis.

Edit: typo (and yes, ugordan, I am sure about that.)
« Last Edit: 03/16/2012 08:22 pm by Comga »
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8689
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3919
  • Likes Given: 818
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #344 on: 03/16/2012 05:02 pm »
You *sure* about that?


Offline ArbitraryConstant

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2019
  • Liked: 629
  • Likes Given: 314
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #346 on: 03/16/2012 05:37 pm »
For instance: "The Merlin 1D will offer up to 155,000lb (689kN) of thrust, an upgrade over the 140,000lb predecessor, the Merlin 1C."

How'd they get that second number? Not much fact-checking.
I believe those numbers are the SL and Vac thrust for the 1D, Vac thrust being higher because of the greater pressure differential between the combustion chamber and outside.

You *sure* about that?
Yup.

Cosine losses are incurred when thrust is off-axis. Falcon 9's thrust isn't.

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8689
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3919
  • Likes Given: 818
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #347 on: 03/16/2012 05:47 pm »
Cosine losses are incurred when thrust is off-axis. Falcon 9's thrust isn't.

Err, F9 thrust is a sum total of the thrust of 9 engines. 8 of them do *not* lie on the vehicle axis.

Can you really say with authority that the outer 8 engines aren't canted to pass closer to vehicle CG for controlability reasons, Saturn I-style? Because all the images and footage *I've* seen, both pad static tests as well as exhaust plume after liftoff strongly suggest to me the outer engines aren't firing straight down, but with a slight sideways component.
« Last Edit: 03/16/2012 06:03 pm by ugordan »

Offline RocketmanUS

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2226
  • USA
  • Liked: 71
  • Likes Given: 31
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #348 on: 03/16/2012 06:51 pm »

and this.. not a direct quote:

Quote
SpaceX is in the midst of a variety of ambitious engine programmes, including the Merlin 2, a significant modification of the Merlin 1 series, and the Raptor upper stage engine. Details of both projects are tightly held.

I would take that as FlightGlobal's artistic license and not based on any hard evidence from SpaceX. There have been raised eyebrows in the past about FlightGlobal's space reporting.
I'd have to agree until shown otherwise.
Is SpaceX developing the Merlin 2?
Are they developing the Raptor?

Offline mmeijeri

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7772
  • Martijn Meijering
  • NL
  • Liked: 397
  • Likes Given: 826
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #349 on: 03/16/2012 06:54 pm »
Can you really say with authority that the outer 8 engines aren't canted to pass closer to vehicle CG for controlability reasons, Saturn I-style?

Interesting, I didn't know that. So it isn't just some last-seconds checkout procedure?
Pro-tip: you don't have to be a jerk if someone doesn't agree with your theories

Offline ArbitraryConstant

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2019
  • Liked: 629
  • Likes Given: 314
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #350 on: 03/16/2012 07:03 pm »
Can you really say with authority that the outer 8 engines aren't canted to pass closer to vehicle CG for controlability reasons, Saturn I-style?
This practice was unknown to me, thanks for the information.

Offline corrodedNut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • Liked: 216
  • Likes Given: 133
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #351 on: 03/16/2012 07:07 pm »
Commercial Crew update:

http://www.spacex.com/updates.php

Offline RocketmanUS

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2226
  • USA
  • Liked: 71
  • Likes Given: 31
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #352 on: 03/16/2012 07:16 pm »
Commercial Crew update:

http://www.spacex.com/updates.php
Crew seats , liner custom fit for each crew member
Up to 6"5" 250lb person ( does not say how short a person could be )

How would a custom fit lined seat handle bringing back a different sized person?

Edit:
They have two great pics.
One with people in the seats.
And one with Elon and two others standing in the capsule showing how much space there is inside.
« Last Edit: 03/16/2012 07:20 pm by RocketmanUS »

Offline corrodedNut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • Liked: 216
  • Likes Given: 133
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #353 on: 03/16/2012 07:19 pm »
Commercial Crew update:

http://www.spacex.com/updates.php
Crew seats , liner custom fit for each crew member
Up to 6"5" 250lb person ( does not say how short a person could be )

How would a custom fit lined seat handle bringing back a different sized person?

Like Souyz, I guess, every crewmember has their own liner.

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8689
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3919
  • Likes Given: 818
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #354 on: 03/16/2012 07:27 pm »
So it isn't just some last-seconds checkout procedure?

I don't believe so. They most likely perform steering checks earlier, but I think they lock the Merlins into flight position a couple of minutes before liftoff.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40269
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 26342
  • Likes Given: 12447
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #355 on: 03/16/2012 07:32 pm »
So it isn't just some last-seconds checkout procedure?

I don't believe so. They most likely perform steering checks earlier, but I think they lock the Merlins into flight position a couple of minutes before liftoff.
Canting the engines so the line of thrust goes through the center of mass allows greater stability (such as in the case of sudden sub-standard performance of an engine or, in the worst case, engine-out), but I wonder if they are made more parallel if they need the performance margin.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Blackjax

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 515
  • Liked: 199
  • Likes Given: 144
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #356 on: 03/16/2012 07:34 pm »
Commercial Crew update:

http://www.spacex.com/updates.php
Crew seats , liner custom fit for each crew member
Up to 6"5" 250lb person ( does not say how short a person could be )

heh, gives me the mental image of this at the base of the launch tower...

Offline DavisSTS

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • England, American Ex Pat
  • Liked: 25
  • Likes Given: 63
« Last Edit: 03/16/2012 07:54 pm by DavisSTS »

Offline Nate_Trost

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
  • Liked: 47
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #358 on: 03/16/2012 08:18 pm »
And one with Elon and two others standing in the capsule showing how much space there is inside.

I want to see the picture with how much space is left with a real ECLSS integrated...

Offline mmeijeri

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7772
  • Martijn Meijering
  • NL
  • Liked: 397
  • Likes Given: 826
Re: SpaceX: General Falcon and Dragon discussion (Thread 5)
« Reply #359 on: 03/16/2012 08:19 pm »
I don't believe so. They most likely perform steering checks earlier, but I think they lock the Merlins into flight position a couple of minutes before liftoff.

How about the Shuttle? Didn't the engines "wiggle" a couple of seconds before lift-off?
Pro-tip: you don't have to be a jerk if someone doesn't agree with your theories

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1