Swiss and/or Shanuson, can you tell us which of the .ts files are currently "stable" and ready for mb fixing? I took a look at frame 131. The fixed_edit8_part_131.ts presumably gives < 19 frames. I downloaded rawsplit_part_8_fixed.ts and found that the mb fixes on http://spacexlanding.wikispaces.com/Frames+131-149 resulted in a scrambled image. I can go ahead and port the fixes to rawsplit_part_8_fixed.ts, but I want to make sure that is our more-or-less final version before I put more time into it.
Folks from Hawthorne have actively participated in this forum. NSF is a commercial website. (See those Site Booster ads >>>)
Edit: Oh yeah, I neglected to mention the CEO of SpaceX tweeted a link to a copy of our derivative work and publicly said "Great progress by @NASASpaceflight members repairing the Falcon 9 ocean landing video". I think we got a green light there.
Two new P-frames in part 11!After tonight's fixing marathon, I decided to go back over my part 11 attempt and I found the two extra P-frames that I was missing before. I've attached the fixed part 11 below. If the mmb / ffmpeg experts could give it a look, I'd be most grateful.I hope everyone didn't mind me posting lots of results - I've just written some custom tools in C++ that help me find the problems, calculate timestamps and so on. It's made it a lot quicker to fix up the TS problems and find P-frames hiding in the corruption. I'm going to turn in for the night now, so it'll give you all a chance to have a look at all the fixed up things and see what you can make from them!
Quote from: mhenderson on 05/27/2014 08:49 pmFolks from Hawthorne have actively participated in this forum. NSF is a commercial website. (See those Site Booster ads >>>) Kinda. No one is earning any money off this thing (as much as we should be given the size of the place now). I think I'm personally $30K down since starting it....don't worry folks, we're self sustaining now, just about.Oh and I'd do it all again if I was given a time machine. Though probably not by starting it by maxing out a card to get it built! QuoteEdit: Oh yeah, I neglected to mention the CEO of SpaceX tweeted a link to a copy of our derivative work and publicly said "Great progress by @NASASpaceflight members repairing the Falcon 9 ocean landing video". I think we got a green light there.Yep, that's a good call. Focus should continue to be on the fine work in fixing the video. I'll ensure the rest, but the non official response I got first of all today was "LOL! You're doing us a favor!" <---seriously!
My current thinking on this is that rather than putting a duplicate timestamp in a matte, I'll redraw the known timestamps using the bitmap numerals already displayed. No interpolated timestamps added.When I get a chance I also want to put together a system that automatically generates png sequences from the mmbs, zips them up, and uploads them to the wiki. That way anyone can download the frames and do their own batch processing on them.
Ok, the first part of this is done. Unfortunately in PNG format the zip file is 85 MB, so trying to auto-upload it to the wiki is probably pushing it. No pun intended. Instead, I put it on Google Drive at this url:
Best to make it explicit with the license Lar suggested earlier: "can we have it licensed under CC-BY-SA version 4, please" and "WITHOUT the NC or ND clauses attached, please" — and for the reasons he articulated so well.
I would like to wish you a good sleep. I liked your marathon.