Author Topic: The future of the AJ10  (Read 23976 times)

Offline the_roche_lobe

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 100
  • Liked: 3
  • Likes Given: 0
The future of the AJ10
« on: 02/09/2010 05:22 am »
Delta II - going
Delta IV 'lite' - stillborn
Shuttle - going
Constellation - going/gone

Is there a future for the long running AJ10 family?
Is it even still in production?

P

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36858
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 20179
  • Likes Given: 412
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #1 on: 02/09/2010 08:45 am »
Delta II - going
Delta IV 'lite' - stillborn
Shuttle - going
Constellation - going/gone

Is there a future for the long running AJ10 family?
Is it even still in production?


Production for Delta II ended years ago.

Offline Downix

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7082
  • Liked: 21
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #2 on: 02/09/2010 10:14 am »
Delta II - going
Delta IV 'lite' - stillborn
Shuttle - going
Constellation - going/gone

Is there a future for the long running AJ10 family?
Is it even still in production?

P

It is still available to purchase.  Its systems are such that I would not be surprised if LM, Boeing or SNC utilizes it in their crew vehicle.  I know if I was looking at crew vehicle development it would be at the top of my list.
chuck - Toilet paper has no real value? Try living with 5 other adults for 6 months in a can with no toilet paper. Man oh man. Toilet paper would be worth it's weight in gold!

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8808
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1315
  • Likes Given: 306
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #3 on: 02/09/2010 01:17 pm »
It is still available to purchase.  Its systems are such that I would not be surprised if LM, Boeing or SNC utilizes it in their crew vehicle.  I know if I was looking at crew vehicle development it would be at the top of my list.

With 9 solids? Look at the January 1997 fireball... The AJ-10 on top of an Atlas or Delta-IV might make more sense.
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline Downix

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7082
  • Liked: 21
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #4 on: 02/10/2010 02:34 am »
It is still available to purchase.  Its systems are such that I would not be surprised if LM, Boeing or SNC utilizes it in their crew vehicle.  I know if I was looking at crew vehicle development it would be at the top of my list.

With 9 solids? Look at the January 1997 fireball... The AJ-10 on top of an Atlas or Delta-IV might make more sense.
huh??
chuck - Toilet paper has no real value? Try living with 5 other adults for 6 months in a can with no toilet paper. Man oh man. Toilet paper would be worth it's weight in gold!

Offline Nick L.

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3857
  • A unique little aerospace company
  • Liked: 6
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #5 on: 02/10/2010 04:26 pm »
It is still available to purchase.  Its systems are such that I would not be surprised if LM, Boeing or SNC utilizes it in their crew vehicle.  I know if I was looking at crew vehicle development it would be at the top of my list.

With 9 solids? Look at the January 1997 fireball... The AJ-10 on top of an Atlas or Delta-IV might make more sense.

Kevin, I think he's talking about the AJ10 engine, not Delta II.
"Now you may leave here for four days in space, but when you return it's the same old place..."

Offline Downix

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7082
  • Liked: 21
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #6 on: 02/10/2010 04:43 pm »
It is still available to purchase.  Its systems are such that I would not be surprised if LM, Boeing or SNC utilizes it in their crew vehicle.  I know if I was looking at crew vehicle development it would be at the top of my list.

With 9 solids? Look at the January 1997 fireball... The AJ-10 on top of an Atlas or Delta-IV might make more sense.

Kevin, I think he's talking about the AJ10 engine, not Delta II.
That is what I took it as, hence why the "Huh?"
chuck - Toilet paper has no real value? Try living with 5 other adults for 6 months in a can with no toilet paper. Man oh man. Toilet paper would be worth it's weight in gold!

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8808
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1315
  • Likes Given: 306
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #7 on: 02/10/2010 06:30 pm »
My miss read, I thought you ment you would start with the Delta II.

I agree the AJ-10 would be excellent. It has a history that dates back further than the RL-10.
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline Ben the Space Brit

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7202
  • A spaceflight fan
  • London, UK
  • Liked: 801
  • Likes Given: 894
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #8 on: 02/10/2010 07:24 pm »
OSC are interested in having a relight-capable upper stage for Taurus-II.  Aerojet have offered AJ-10.  I also suspect that AJ-10 may find its way into at least one (Lockheed's) commercial crew vehicle proposal.
"Oops! I left the silly thing in reverse!" - Duck Dodgers

~*~*~*~

The Space Shuttle Program - 1981-2011

The time for words has passed; The time has come to put up or shut up!
DON'T PROPAGANDISE, FLY!!!

Offline Downix

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7082
  • Liked: 21
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #9 on: 02/11/2010 08:05 pm »
Is there a future for the long running AJ10 family?
Is it even still in production?

A version of the AJ10 powers the Shuttle orbiter OMS units.  This engine is being further developed to power the Orion service module. 

Oh wait.  There isn't going to be an Orion service module. 

Never mind. 

 - Ed Kyle
But there will be a Dream Chaser, Boeing/Bigelow's "Orion Lite" and whatever LM is working on, all of which are prime canidates for the AJ-10.
chuck - Toilet paper has no real value? Try living with 5 other adults for 6 months in a can with no toilet paper. Man oh man. Toilet paper would be worth it's weight in gold!

Offline Patchouli

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
  • Liked: 253
  • Likes Given: 457
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #10 on: 02/12/2010 01:22 am »
Is there a future for the long running AJ10 family?
Is it even still in production?

A version of the AJ10 powers the Shuttle orbiter OMS units.  This engine is being further developed to power the Orion service module. 

Oh wait.  There isn't going to be an Orion service module. 

Never mind. 

 - Ed Kyle
But there will be a Dream Chaser, Boeing/Bigelow's "Orion Lite" and whatever LM is working on, all of which are prime canidates for the AJ-10.

Doesn't Dreamchaser have an OMS based off SS1/SS2's propulsion system?

But I can see the AJ10 having a future on a lunar variant of Dragon or a commercial cargo tug.
« Last Edit: 02/12/2010 02:43 am by Patchouli »

Offline Downix

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7082
  • Liked: 21
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #11 on: 02/12/2010 01:00 pm »
Does anyone have a good manual of the AJ-10, now I am curious to see what it can do.
chuck - Toilet paper has no real value? Try living with 5 other adults for 6 months in a can with no toilet paper. Man oh man. Toilet paper would be worth it's weight in gold!

Offline mmeijeri

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7770
  • Martijn Meijering
  • NL
  • Liked: 389
  • Likes Given: 806
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #12 on: 02/12/2010 01:02 pm »
But I can see the AJ10 having a future on a lunar variant of Dragon or a commercial cargo tug.

Wouldn't Kestrel be more likely?
Pro-tip: you don't have to be a jerk if someone doesn't agree with your theories

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10197
  • Liked: 646
  • Likes Given: 715
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #13 on: 02/12/2010 03:10 pm »
But I can see the AJ10 having a future on a lunar variant of Dragon or a commercial cargo tug.

Wouldn't Kestrel be more likely?

AFAIK, Kestral is a kerolox system, not good for long term use.

Offline mmeijeri

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7770
  • Martijn Meijering
  • NL
  • Liked: 389
  • Likes Given: 806
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #14 on: 02/12/2010 03:15 pm »
AFAIK, Kestral is a kerolox system, not good for long term use.

At L1/L2 and with good insulation that might not be too much of a problem. Or else with a kerosene/peroxide variant. Not that AJ-10 would not be great, but SpaceX seems to prefer to build things themselves.
« Last Edit: 02/13/2010 07:08 am by mmeijeri »
Pro-tip: you don't have to be a jerk if someone doesn't agree with your theories

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38679
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 24377
  • Likes Given: 11928
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #15 on: 02/15/2010 07:59 pm »
AFAIK, Kestral is a kerolox system, not good for long term use.

At L1/L2 and with good insulation that might not be too much of a problem. Or else with a kerosene/peroxide variant. Not that AJ-10 would not be great, but SpaceX seems to prefer to build things themselves.
Only if they can't get a good enough price from outside, which happens a lot when lots of people are used to juicy fat-margin contracts.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Patchouli

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
  • Liked: 253
  • Likes Given: 457
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #16 on: 02/15/2010 10:27 pm »
The AJ10 could still find use by Orbital on future versions of Cygnus.
A crewed variant could make use of a higher thrust OMS system and they too could become interested in a lunar capable vehicle.
OSC seems to prefer to not reinvent something if it can be bought off the shelf.

Offline mmeijeri

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7770
  • Martijn Meijering
  • NL
  • Liked: 389
  • Likes Given: 806
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #17 on: 02/16/2010 09:16 am »
AJ-10 is my favourite for near-term storable propulsion, but a kerosene/peroxide Merlin and Kestrel would be great too. If you wanted to use this for landers you might want a pump-fed version anyway. If you're going to develop a new engine, you may as well go with something non-toxic.
Pro-tip: you don't have to be a jerk if someone doesn't agree with your theories

Offline Vahe231991

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • 11 Canyon Terrace
  • Liked: 453
  • Likes Given: 199
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #18 on: 05/17/2021 03:37 am »
The Orion spacecraft that was first launched on December 5, 2014, relies on the AJ10 for primary propulsion. Therefore, the AJ10 is still in use even though the Delta II that used an AJ10 as the rocket motor for the second stage was retired in 2018.

Link:
https://newatlas.com/nasa-test-fire-service-module-engine/60944/
https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/orion-mpcv.htm

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36858
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 20179
  • Likes Given: 412
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #19 on: 05/17/2021 11:47 am »
The Orion spacecraft that was first launched on December 5, 2014, relies on the AJ10 for primary propulsion. Therefore, the AJ10 is still in use even though the Delta II that used an AJ10 as the rocket motor for the second stage was retired in 2018.


No, it had no active service module and hence no AJ10

Offline MATTBLAK

  • Elite Veteran & 'J.A.F.A'
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5362
  • 'Space Cadets' Let us; UNITE!! (crickets chirping)
  • New Zealand
  • Liked: 2237
  • Likes Given: 3883
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #20 on: 05/17/2021 12:02 pm »
The Orion spacecraft that was first launched on December 5, 2014, relies on the AJ10 for primary propulsion. Therefore, the AJ10 is still in use even though the Delta II that used an AJ10 as the rocket motor for the second stage was retired in 2018.


No, it had no active service module and hence no AJ10
I know, right?! People making authoritative statements such as that the 2014 flight's Service Module had an engine - such a thing would be easy to look up and confirm.
"Those who can't, Blog".   'Space Cadets' of the World - Let us UNITE!! (crickets chirping)

Offline Vahe231991

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • 11 Canyon Terrace
  • Liked: 453
  • Likes Given: 199
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #21 on: 02/04/2022 02:14 am »
The Orion spacecraft that was first launched on December 5, 2014, relies on the AJ10 for primary propulsion. Therefore, the AJ10 is still in use even though the Delta II that used an AJ10 as the rocket motor for the second stage was retired in 2018.


No, it had no active service module and hence no AJ10
I know, right?! People making authoritative statements such as that the 2014 flight's Service Module had an engine - such a thing would be easy to look up and confirm.
As explained here, the Orion's service module is powered by one AJ10-190 engine, which generates 5,778 pounds of thrust.

Offline Skyrocket

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • Liked: 863
  • Likes Given: 166
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #22 on: 02/04/2022 06:25 am »
The Orion spacecraft that was first launched on December 5, 2014, relies on the AJ10 for primary propulsion. Therefore, the AJ10 is still in use even though the Delta II that used an AJ10 as the rocket motor for the second stage was retired in 2018.


No, it had no active service module and hence no AJ10
I know, right?! People making authoritative statements such as that the 2014 flight's Service Module had an engine - such a thing would be easy to look up and confirm.
As explained here, the Orion's service module is powered by one AJ10-190 engine, which generates 5,778 pounds of thrust.

Here is a photo showing the Artemis-1 Orion spacecraft with the AJ10-90 engine. It is the first Orion capsule with this engine.
The Orion EFT-1 flight did not have a service module, hence no AJ10 engine

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36858
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 20179
  • Likes Given: 412
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #23 on: 02/04/2022 03:03 pm »
As explained here, the Orion's service module is powered by one AJ10-190 engine, which generates 5,778 pounds of thrust.

There was no active service module or AJ10 on EFT-1.

Look at the date of the article you linked

« Last Edit: 02/04/2022 03:05 pm by Jim »

Offline Vahe231991

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • 11 Canyon Terrace
  • Liked: 453
  • Likes Given: 199
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #24 on: 02/04/2022 03:29 pm »
As explained here, the Orion's service module is powered by one AJ10-190 engine, which generates 5,778 pounds of thrust.

There was no active service module or AJ10 on EFT-1.

Look at the date of the article you linked
This article doesn't mention the EFT-1 mission, it only emphasizes that the Orion space modules being earmarked for the Artemis missions have been or are being fitted with the AJ10.

Offline DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4299
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 3418
  • Likes Given: 1284
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #25 on: 02/04/2022 03:33 pm »
As explained here, the Orion's service module is powered by one AJ10-190 engine, which generates 5,778 pounds of thrust.

There was no active service module or AJ10 on EFT-1.

Look at the date of the article you linked
This article doesn't mention the EFT-1 mission, it only emphasizes that the Orion space modules being earmarked for the Artemis missions have been or are being fitted with the AJ10.
Please read the Wikipedia article for an overview, and then read that article's references. EFT-1 did not have a real service module.
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploration_Flight_Test-1
Also, don't argue with Jim. He was there. You were not.

Offline jbenton

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 411
  • Liked: 151
  • Likes Given: 700
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #26 on: 02/04/2022 03:58 pm »
As explained here, the Orion's service module is powered by one AJ10-190 engine, which generates 5,778 pounds of thrust.

There was no active service module or AJ10 on EFT-1.

Look at the date of the article you linked
This article doesn't mention the EFT-1 mission, it only emphasizes that the Orion space modules being earmarked for the Artemis missions have been or are being fitted with the AJ10.

Though you're right that the Orion CSM will use AJ10, they're mentioning EFT-1 because you described it as "the Orion spacecraft's first flight."

The Orion spacecraft that was first launched on December 5, 2014, relies on the AJ10 for primary propulsion. Therefore, the AJ10 is still in use even though the Delta II that used an AJ10 as the rocket motor for the second stage was retired in 2018.

Link:
https://newatlas.com/nasa-test-fire-service-module-engine/60944/
https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/orion-mpcv.htm
Emphasis mine.

That flight only had the capsule with no service module. Artemis 1 will be the first launch with the whole CSM stack, including the AJ10. The articles you linked say that Orion will use AJ10 in flight they do not say that it was used on EFT-1. I don't think that you're asserting that it was used in EFT-1, but the way you phrased it, you seemed to imply that it was used in EFT-1.
« Last Edit: 02/04/2022 03:59 pm by jbenton »

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15134
  • Liked: 8023
  • Likes Given: 1268
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #27 on: 02/04/2022 04:24 pm »
Aren't the Orion AJ10 engines repurposed from Shuttle orbiters?  There are a limited number available I suspect.

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 02/04/2022 04:24 pm by edkyle99 »

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36858
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 20179
  • Likes Given: 412
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #28 on: 02/04/2022 04:34 pm »
As explained here, the Orion's service module is powered by one AJ10-190 engine, which generates 5,778 pounds of thrust.

There was no active service module or AJ10 on EFT-1.

Look at the date of the article you linked
This article doesn't mention the EFT-1 mission, it only emphasizes that the Orion space modules being earmarked for the Artemis missions have been or are being fitted with the AJ10.

It doesn't have to mention EFT-1.  Look at the title of the article "ORIONíS EUROPEAN SERVICE MODULE MAKES ITS DEBUT AT KENNEDY SPACE CENTER"  It means the first one. 

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36858
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 20179
  • Likes Given: 412
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #29 on: 02/04/2022 04:37 pm »
The Orion spacecraft that was first launched on December 5, 2014, relies on the AJ10 for primary propulsion.


This specific sentence is wrong or at the least misleading. 

The Orion spacecraft that was launched on December 5, 2014 did not rely on the AJ10 for primary propulsion.

Offline tadaniels

  • Member
  • Posts: 18
  • Bow, NH
  • Liked: 13
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #30 on: 02/04/2022 04:38 pm »
Aren't the Orion AJ10 engines repurposed from Shuttle orbiters?  There are a limited number available I suspect.

 - Ed Kyle

My understanding is that they are re-purposed STS OMS engines.

Offline Hog

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Woodstock
  • Liked: 1674
  • Likes Given: 6635
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #31 on: 02/09/2022 07:06 pm »
Aren't the Orion AJ10 engines repurposed from Shuttle orbiters?  There are a limited number available I suspect.

 - Ed Kyle

My understanding is that they are re-purposed STS OMS engines.
They are, and NASA put out an RFI back in 2019 for new ones.
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=45002.0
Paul

Offline Vahe231991

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • 11 Canyon Terrace
  • Liked: 453
  • Likes Given: 199
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #32 on: 02/09/2022 08:56 pm »
Are there any photos of the AJ10 engines being incorporated into Orion space capsule earmarked for the Artemis II mission, since the space capsule for the Artemis III mission is still under construction?

Offline Kaputnik

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3071
  • Liked: 714
  • Likes Given: 807
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #33 on: 02/10/2022 07:46 pm »
So are new AJ10s available?
If not, what is the current stock of ex-Shuttle engines?

Anybody else here old enough to remember the original methalox design for Orion... *sigh*...
"I don't care what anything was DESIGNED to do, I care about what it CAN do"- Gene Kranz

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8622
  • Liked: 4494
  • Likes Given: 768
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #34 on: 02/10/2022 08:01 pm »
So are new AJ10s available?
If not, what is the current stock of ex-Shuttle engines?

Anybody else here old enough to remember the original methalox design for Orion... *sigh*...
The AJ10 production modernization and restart programme is underway. A new modernized and additively manufactured version is in development to replace all legacy AJ10 versions and variants. Also AJ10 is undergoing an incremental upgrades testing programme like RS-25.

Offline Hog

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Woodstock
  • Liked: 1674
  • Likes Given: 6635
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #35 on: 02/10/2022 09:36 pm »
So are new AJ10s available?
If not, what is the current stock of ex-Shuttle engines?

Anybody else here old enough to remember the original methalox design for Orion... *sigh*...
There was an article that detailed all the specifics, I looked but couldn't find it.  It was dated from when one was hotfired.
Paul

Offline hektor

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2630
  • Liked: 1136
  • Likes Given: 52
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #36 on: 02/10/2022 10:02 pm »
Are there any photos of the AJ10 engines being incorporated into Orion space capsule earmarked for the Artemis II mission, since the space capsule for the Artemis III mission is still under construction?

There is only one engine per Orion. The engine was already installed - in the case of Artemis II - on the second European Service Module which was delivered to KSC a few month ago. Likewise for Artemis III an AJ10 has been shipped or should be shipped to Germany for the same purpose. Ditto for Artemis IV, etc.

Airbus readies the no. 2 European Service Module for its crewed mission to the Moon
« Last Edit: 02/10/2022 10:04 pm by hektor »

Offline Vahe231991

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • 11 Canyon Terrace
  • Liked: 453
  • Likes Given: 199
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #37 on: 11/17/2022 03:17 am »
In the wake of the success of the first launch of the SLS, once the Orion spacecraft being used in the Artemis 1 mission approaches lunar orbit we should expect images to be released of Orion CM-002 firing the AJ10 engine to the lunar orbit insertion.

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8622
  • Liked: 4494
  • Likes Given: 768
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #38 on: 11/17/2022 02:22 pm »
In the wake of the success of the first launch of the SLS, once the Orion spacecraft being used in the Artemis 1 mission approaches lunar orbit we should expect images to be released of Orion CM-002 firing the AJ10 engine to the lunar orbit insertion.
AFAIU it is going to a distant retrograde orbit.

Offline DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4299
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 3418
  • Likes Given: 1284
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #39 on: 11/17/2022 02:35 pm »
In the wake of the success of the first launch of the SLS, once the Orion spacecraft being used in the Artemis 1 mission approaches lunar orbit we should expect images to be released of Orion CM-002 firing the AJ10 engine to the lunar orbit insertion.
AFAIU it is going to a distant retrograde orbit.
Yes, but"distant retrograde orbit" does not convey the true strangeness of this trajectory at all. The spacecraft has two close encounters with the Moon, one when entering this orbit and one as it is leaving. The trajectory between these events is a wondrous pair of loops around the moon that do not look like ellipses at all. There is an animation at:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_1

Offline Vahe231991

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • 11 Canyon Terrace
  • Liked: 453
  • Likes Given: 199
Re: The future of the AJ10
« Reply #40 on: 12/08/2022 04:46 pm »
Has NASA released any images showing the Orion space capsule used for the Artemis 1 mission firing the AJ10-190 engines for entering distant retrograde lunar orbit?

Tags: aj10 Orion SLS 
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1