Quote from: catdlr on 01/22/2017 05:37 amand the video now available for replay....H-IIA rocket 32 Unit Pre-launch briefing / H-2A Rocket F32 Before launch briefing sessionNVSStreamed live 2 hours ago2017.01.22 (Sun) 14:00~is launched about one-day briefing of reporters who performed prior to. Other launch content of the current H-IIA, development status, is transmitted information such as weather judgment.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4TMmep-Zic?t=001The sheets shown in the video hint towards a H-2A-204 version with four SRBs. Can someone, who understands Japanese, confirm this?
and the video now available for replay....H-IIA rocket 32 Unit Pre-launch briefing / H-2A Rocket F32 Before launch briefing sessionNVSStreamed live 2 hours ago2017.01.22 (Sun) 14:00~is launched about one-day briefing of reporters who performed prior to. Other launch content of the current H-IIA, development status, is transmitted information such as weather judgment.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4TMmep-Zic?t=001
Well at the pre launch press briefing the rocket has been confirmed as in the 204 configuration with the 4S payload fairing. That thing on top might be heavier than one would expect....Oh and for the 24th "T-zero is set for zero seven colon four four colon zero zero Zulu".
DSN Corporation is a joint venture between SKY Perfect JSAT Group (JSAT), NEC, NTT Com and Maeda Corporation. It is a private-public inititative where DSN will finance and manage the Japanese X-Band military network.Officially everything was ordered by JSAT, with the first of two satellite ordered to MELCO (on DS2000 platform) and the second to NEC (on the NX-G platform). If I'm allowed to speculate, I think that NEC's place was logically MELCO's. But they had an over-billing scandal to the Japanese government and thus they were forbidden from bidding on government contracts for five years.This would explain why everything was left to JSAT to decide, so they could procure from MELCO. Given that they gave one satellite to each provider, I would also bet that the Japanese military wanted to keep two suppliers of milspec satellites. This enabled NEC to get one contract. I would aso assume that DNS-1 was the "safe" satellite and DSN-2 was the "high risk" bird since NEC has never made such a big GSO bird.Reality was that MELCO screw up DSN-1 delivery (a tarpaulin blocked an exhaust valve con the container and DNS-1 was overpressurized), and thus was delayed at least by a year.So was was originally the backup craft, will be the first to be put into service.
Quote from: baldusi on 11/25/2016 01:50 pmDSN Corporation is a joint venture between SKY Perfect JSAT Group (JSAT), NEC, NTT Com and Maeda Corporation. It is a private-public inititative where DSN will finance and manage the Japanese X-Band military network.Officially everything was ordered by JSAT, with the first of two satellite ordered to MELCO (on DS2000 platform) and the second to NEC (on the NX-G platform). If I'm allowed to speculate, I think that NEC's place was logically MELCO's. But they had an over-billing scandal to the Japanese government and thus they were forbidden from bidding on government contracts for five years.This would explain why everything was left to JSAT to decide, so they could procure from MELCO. Given that they gave one satellite to each provider, I would also bet that the Japanese military wanted to keep two suppliers of milspec satellites. This enabled NEC to get one contract. I would aso assume that DNS-1 was the "safe" satellite and DSN-2 was the "high risk" bird since NEC has never made such a big GSO bird.Reality was that MELCO screw up DSN-1 delivery (a tarpaulin blocked an exhaust valve con the container and DNS-1 was overpressurized), and thus was delayed at least by a year.So was was originally the backup craft, will be the first to be put into service.Do you have a source for DSN2 being an NX-G? Based on what I've seen from JSAT both sats are MELCO DS2000 busbut with NEC as prime contractor - i.e. MELCO built the sat bus and NEC integrates it.. that may be old info though so I'd be happy to see a more up to date source