Author Topic: FAA, FWS & other permits/licenses for Starbase, TX (Boca Chica) DISCUSSION (Thread 6)  (Read 112465 times)

Online Eka

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 840
  • Land between two rivers.
  • Liked: 512
  • Likes Given: 1024
Some ATC recordings from pilots observing the event:



The pilots and controllers are used to moving a mile about every 6 seconds.  Their decision loops depend on this relatively slow movement rate.

The debris moves over 30 miles in those 6 seconds.

The response is too late, and the delays to getting things back into that airspace were unnecessary.  By the time controllers "talked to their supervisors", the debris was already 100s of miles downrange, if not thousands.  By the time they opened the airspace back up, the debris over a thousand miles downrange in the ocean already, and had probably sunk already.

The NOTAMs are either sufficiently wide and long, or they are not.  The slow reaction times from slow decision loops make divert efforts for airplanes a waste of time and resources.

Quote
expected delay of 99 minutes

Good grief, there's no debris in the area in the air after 5 minutes.
No, light debris like tiles and refractory blankets will slow very fast once separated from the heavy pieces, and take a long time to fall to earth. They have 80 to 90 miles to fall. They will also be strewn over the whole reentry path. The big heavy chunks will fall much faster. Still there can be metal bits still hitting the ground 10 minutes after the RUD.

I do think the notifications to the ATCs when there is a RUD needs to be much better and faster. Sub 1 minute so the diversions can start asap. Possible debris zones also need to be better disseminated to the airlines and ATCs. They are published, but the proactivity of distribution isn't very good. Unfortunately that is dependent on agencies run by governments all over the world.

Pilots deal with contingencies that cause diversions all the time. It is part of life. Ellie in Space interviewed a current 787 pilot, so I'll let her speak in the linked video.

A very important thing to know is the reentry is initially happening 80 to 90 miles up and at a very shallow entry angle. It takes time for the debris to slow and really start falling to the 5-9 mile high altitudes modern jetliners fly at. Even the big heavy bits take a few minutes to fall to jet altitudes. They have plenty of ballistic energy. Bits like individual tiles and refractory blanket pieces will slow fast, and take 15+ minutes to fall. There is plenty of time to divert flights if the notices go out fast. Even to those directly below it.

Here is a very good video to watch:
We talk about creating a Star Trek future, but will end up with The Expanse if radical change doesn't happen.

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2723
  • UK
  • Liked: 4505
  • Likes Given: 623
0327-EX-ST-2025 [Feb 21]

Quote
This STA uses information from previous grant 0163-EX-ST-2025. This STA is necessary to authorize Starship Test Flight 9 vehicle communications launching from Starbase TX. Application includes a sub-orbital first stage booster and a second stage.

Operation Start Date: 03/14/2025
Operation End Date: 06/30/2025

Offline InterestedEngineer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3213
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 2388
  • Likes Given: 3975
Licensing for Launch 8 (+)?

https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=62496.msg2667540#msg2667540

It's interesting to note that this authorization from the "Manager, Safety Authorization Division" has over three times as many words about environmental regulation than human safety.   Interesting set of priorities from the FAA.

Offline Herb Schaltegger

Licensing for Launch 8 (+)?

https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=62496.msg2667540#msg2667540

It's interesting to note that this authorization from the "Manager, Safety Authorization Division" has over three times as many words about environmental regulation than human safety.   Interesting set of priorities from the FAA.


“Human safety” is easy to word succinctly, and grasp intuitively. Environmental concerns much less so, especially when read by people pre-conditioned to discount them in the first place.
Ad astra per aspirin ...

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2723
  • UK
  • Liked: 4505
  • Likes Given: 623
0493-EX-ST-2025 [Mar 17]

Quote
This STA uses information from previous grant 0184-EX-ST-2025 and is necessary to authorize an additional power level for uplink frequencies 2090 MHz and 2062 MHz for the 1st stage booster on Starship Test Flight 9 launching from Starbase TX. This STA is necessary for Starship Super Heavy vehicle communications at SpaceX facilities located in Boca Chica TX

Operation Start Date: 04/07/2025
Operation End Date: 10/07/2025

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2723
  • UK
  • Liked: 4505
  • Likes Given: 623
FCC Public Notice [Mar 28]

Quote
SAT-LOA-20241218-00288
Date Filed: 12/18/2024

Space Exploration Holdings, LLC, requests authority to construct, deploy, and operate a system of space stations on Starship spacecraft and its variants including a standard ship, tanker, propellant depot, and Human Landing System (HLS). SpaceX requests authority to operate Starship spacecraft and its variants in low-Earth orbit, medium-Earth orbit, high-Earth orbit, and trans-lunar, and lunar orbit.

SpaceX proposes to operate in the 410-420 MHz (space-to-space), 2025-2100 MHz (Earth-to-space), 2200-2290 MHz (space-to-Earth), 10.7-12.7 GHz (space-to-space), 14.0-14.5 GHz (space-to-space), 25.5-27.0 GHz (Earth-to-space), and 22.55-23.15 GHz (space-to-Earth) bands.

Additionally, SpaceX requests to operate in the 5.735-5.875 GHz band for communications between spacecraft and crew and between crew and the 35.5-36.0 GHz band for lunar landing radar. SpaceX requests waiver of sections 25.114(c), 25.114(d), 25.156, 25.157, and section 2.106 of the Commission’s rules.

SAT-LOA-20241218-00288
« Last Edit: 03/31/2025 01:58 pm by StraumliBlight »

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8187
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 2823
  • Likes Given: 2552
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2723
  • UK
  • Liked: 4505
  • Likes Given: 623
0899-EX-ST-2025 [May 7]

Quote
This STA uses information from the Boca Chica and Brownsville TX ground testing grant 2252-EX-ST-2024. This STA is necessary to authorize 2056 MHz and 2062 MHz at low power (3W) for on-ground testing only of Starship Super Heavy vehicle communications to include Test Flight 9 day of launch starting at T-14 hours through T+10 minutes at the SpaceX test facility located in Boca Chica and Brownsville TX.

Operation Start Date: 05/18/2025
Operation End Date:   06/18/2025

Quote from: Pre Coordination Document
FCC may be able to provide a quick path in the short term considering the FT 9 launch window opens on 5/19, rather than to mod 2252-EX-ST-2024 at this time.



0852-EX-ST-2025 [May 8]

Quote
This STA uses information from previous grant 0327-EX-ST-2025 and includes uplink frequencies 2056 MHz and 2062 MHz at low power. This STA is necessary to authorize Starship Test Flight 10 vehicle communications launching from Starbase TX. Application includes a sub-orbital first stage booster and a second stage. Trajectory data will be provided directly to NTIA, USAF, and NASA. Launch licensing authority is FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation.

Operation Start Date: 06/01/2025
Operation End Date:   12/01/2025

Quote from: AFTRCC Pre Coordination Document to Dec 2025
MIRAD: 806 KM (500.93 miles)
East trajectory over water
Maximum flight altitude: 0-380160',AGL
0-72 miles AGL
Dates: 2025-06-28 thru 2025-12-28



0910-EX-ST-2025 [May 12]

Quote
This STA uses information from previous grant 0493-EX-ST-2025 and is necessary to authorize an additional power level for uplink frequencies 2056 MHz and 2062 MHz for the booster and ship on Starship Test Flight 10 launching from Starbase TX. This STA is necessary for Starship Super Heavy vehicle communications at SpaceX facilities located in Boca Chica TX.

Operation Start Date: 06/02/2025
Operation End Date: 12/02/2025
« Last Edit: 05/12/2025 07:08 pm by StraumliBlight »

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2723
  • UK
  • Liked: 4505
  • Likes Given: 623
0878-EX-ST-2025 [May 15]

Quote
This STA extends ground testing frequency and location information for Boca Chica and Brownsville TX in grant 2252-EX-ST-2024, and adds 2056/2062/2230/2236 MHz. This STA is necessary to authorize on-ground testing only of Starship Super Heavy vehicle communications at the SpaceX test facilities located in Boca Chica and Brownsville TX.

On-ground testing of Starship Super Heavy vehicle communications at SpaceX test facility locations in Boca Chica and Brownsville, TX.

Operation Start Date: 06/13/2025
Operation End Date: 12/13/2025

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17993
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 15720
  • Likes Given: 11151
Is this Legit?

Quote
ONE STEP CLOSER TO STARSHIP’S NINTH FLIGHT!

The FAA has released a review of flight license 23-129 Rev 5.3, which would allow SpaceX to conduct up to 25 flights annually and authorize Starship to fly again, provided the investigation (MISHAP) into the events of the eighth flight is concluded or SpaceX is permitted to fly while the investigation remains under review

https://twitter.com/FronteraSpacial/status/1923350370983502300
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline xvel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 771
  • I'm metric and I'm proud of it
  • Liked: 851
  • Likes Given: 303
Nothing new here I think
And God said: "Let there be a metric system". And there was the metric system.
And God saw that it was a good system.

Offline Nomadd

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9018
  • Virginia
  • Liked: 61221
  • Likes Given: 1386
Is this Legit?

Quote
ONE STEP CLOSER TO STARSHIP’S NINTH FLIGHT!

The FAA has released a review of flight license 23-129 Rev 5.3, which would allow SpaceX to conduct up to 25 flights annually and authorize Starship to fly again, provided the investigation (MISHAP) into the events of the eighth flight is concluded or SpaceX is permitted to fly while the investigation remains under review

 Yep. I still get those because I responded to their request for comments years ago. English and Spanish versions. You can see an email on the bottom to get on the list.
« Last Edit: 05/16/2025 03:21 pm by Nomadd »
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.

Online crandles57

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 900
  • Sychdyn
  • Liked: 535
  • Likes Given: 197
Nothing new here I think

People may well have known about this before this posting.

However,
Previously they seemed to submit mishap report or request for no public safety issue waiver then got the launch licence later. This time they seem to have got the launch licence subject to condition that the mishap report is complete or waived. Is that something new or has it happened before? Can anything be read into this or is it just some random SpaceX/FAA being quicker off the mark on submission/dealing with the licence?

More familiarity with licence process or more scrutiny of mishap report or ... ? 

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38469
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 23222
  • Likes Given: 434


Hopefully soon sharks and whales will no longer be able to delay Starship launches.


LOL, spoke too soon.
« Last Edit: 06/05/2025 08:56 pm by Jim »

Offline zack

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 135
  • Liked: 165
  • Likes Given: 37
EPA: Mighty launch pads you have here, would be a shame if anyone started investigating...

Offline wannamoonbase

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5786
  • Denver, CO
    • U.S. Metric Association
  • Liked: 3509
  • Likes Given: 4435
EPA: Mighty launch pads you have here, would be a shame if anyone started investigating...

FAA, nice launch license you have there, would be a shame if…
We very much need orbiter missions to Neptune and Uranus.  The cruise will be long, so we best get started.

Offline RoboGoofers

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1032
  • NJ
  • Liked: 912
  • Likes Given: 1032
I'm reminded of the line in Apollo 13, "We just lost the moon"

Offline wannamoonbase

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5786
  • Denver, CO
    • U.S. Metric Association
  • Liked: 3509
  • Likes Given: 4435
I'm reminded of the line in Apollo 13, "We just lost the moon"

That’s how I felt most of yesterday. 
We very much need orbiter missions to Neptune and Uranus.  The cruise will be long, so we best get started.

Offline thespacecow

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
  • e/acc
  • Liked: 765
  • Likes Given: 302


Hopefully soon sharks and whales will no longer be able to delay Starship launches.


LOL, spoke too soon.

Both sides are standing down, I'm going to bet 6/5 is a nothing burger.

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38469
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 23222
  • Likes Given: 434

Both sides are standing down, I'm going to bet 6/5 is a nothing burger.

Meh.  Musk lost favoritism

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1