The list must be regarded as unofficial,
Quote from: rocketeer on 02/10/2013 08:44 pm The list must be regarded as unofficial, If ULA has decided not to publish an official mission number, or vehicle number, than that list has to be "unofficial". If ULA doesn't want their vehicles listed with a number, than why bother? Just refer to the payload. - Ed Kyle
Quote from: edkyle99 on 03/05/2013 01:30 amQuote from: rocketeer on 02/10/2013 08:44 pm The list must be regarded as unofficial, If ULA has decided not to publish an official mission number, or vehicle number, than that list has to be "unofficial". If ULA doesn't want their vehicles listed with a number, than why bother? Just refer to the payload. - Ed KyleThey do publish them, just not timely enough for you.
Quote from: Jim on 03/05/2013 02:20 amQuote from: edkyle99 on 03/05/2013 01:30 amQuote from: rocketeer on 02/10/2013 08:44 pm The list must be regarded as unofficial, If ULA has decided not to publish an official mission number, or vehicle number, than that list has to be "unofficial". If ULA doesn't want their vehicles listed with a number, than why bother? Just refer to the payload. - Ed KyleThey do publish them, just not timely enough for you.Mind if I ask where? ULA doesn't include them in their press kit, or in their on-line mission coverage. Goddard's Mission Set Database has even stopped listing the numbers. - Ed Kyle
... however I think that should have been "Seven of nine"
SBIRS GEO-2 Launch Team to Hold Media Teleconferencehttp://spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=40285Can these be monitored or recorded by non press personnel?
What's the go with the ULA website? On the home page there are 3 separate items that are displayed. One has a picture of an Atlas launch and the caption states "NASA selects Delta II for ICESat-2" , followed by another picture this time of a Delta II launch with the caption "Set to launch Atlas V SBIRS GEO-2"