Hi Tass and Robotbeat!I just would like to share my discoveries and to receive some feedback. As I mentioned on my post, there is a theory and experiments. If it is pseudoscience, then I would like someone to prove it with real arguments.I am just looking for some real feedback. What would you do if you were in my position? ( I am just a simple Electronic Engineer from a technological Institution, not even a University). There is no chance for someone to go further if he does not belong to the official Science (You understand how official Science worked the last 100 years and works today) by sharing those you find on my web site. With other words, I AM NOBODY.The theory is very straight and needs only a high school education (not a University degree) to be understood.I will be very happy to discuss my work and especially on the concept of the variable inertial mass (based on the variable speed of light with distance) which leads to the concept of propelant less propulsion and real Antigravity.Kind RegardsIoannis
Welcome to the forum.The world has enough "theories" on how to do propellant propulsion. Experimenters, on the other hand, are sorely lacking.
The motion is caused by vibrating against the table. Proof: hang it from a string and run the experiment again, the sideways motion will disappear.
Your posts are inconsistent. You say "the force" follows the direction of the magnetic field, but you are putting an AC waveform into the coil, so the magnetic field is switching directions at the same frequency as the AC waveform. How do you explain any preferential direction of motion?Other than the fact that your setup is randomly rattling around on a wooden surface with a possibly un-level table top plus the tension of your thick wires pulling on the ring/coil?
You and antiquark insist on pointless claims
Quote from: Ioannis on 02/01/2013 04:44 pmYou and antiquark insist on pointless claimsOn the contrary, if this is intended to be a space drive, you should know that there are very few tabletops in outer space. As such, it's an extremely important experiment to ensure that the device can operate in the absence of a tabletop. Anyways, all quibbling aside, running the thing with a string attached would take, what, five minutes?
antiquark, the problem is that I cannot repeat the experiment since the material is defect due to the extreme Electric Field that was created inside the ferromagnetic material. I can explain it but you must be able to understand technical details in regards to Radiation Resistance, Insulating internal Layers of the MnZn Ferrite, e.t.c.
then how you explain the thrust on the LEGO Car or the first part where the ring rotates clockwise and counterclockwise by demand (absolute controllable)?
What happens if you run it on the tabletop now, does it no longer move?You could also buy a new ferrite, in fact, you should buy a dozen of them so you can continue with your experiments without interruptions.
Also, if the effect is real, it will be more spectacular when the device is suspended on a string, since there will not be the friction from the wheel.Apart from this, I confess I did not understand anything to the paper, and I have no idea why the thing moves on the video.
I have stopped experimenting with this material and I am not going to use this kind of ferrite anymore
Quote from: Ioannis on 02/01/2013 05:32 pm I have stopped experimenting with this material and I am not going to use this kind of ferrite anymore If the experiment is not reproducible, then it's not science!
Dude, your equations form the first post, please define all variables and their units. I want to check your units but I can't even do that right now without the definitions.
I think I was very clear! It was working until lately. I wanted to test it again when I took it from the Cellar (it was there for three years. Since 2009) and I try it, it worked on the floor too but then I heard a "crack" coming from the inner part of the ring.
Quote from: Ioannis on 02/01/2013 06:01 pmI think I was very clear! It was working until lately. I wanted to test it again when I took it from the Cellar (it was there for three years. Since 2009) and I try it, it worked on the floor too but then I heard a "crack" coming from the inner part of the ring. Then buy another one. And, if you buy another one and cannot recreate the experiment, then according to the scientific method... your theory is wrong!
Yes. This experiment needs to be repeated in order to be proved. If you are now working on something else then you need to stop and go back to the first task and run a complete test program. That is the best feedback we can give you.