ESA has published a video of simulation of the launch:So far I haven't seen the trajectory of Briz-M and how many burns are planed. But my goodness, spacecraft separation is scheduled for 10.5 hours after launch! This is a long flight profile, very complicated.
Quote from: Svetoslav on 02/17/2016 09:21 amESA has published a video of simulation of the launch:So far I haven't seen the trajectory of Briz-M and how many burns are planed. But my goodness, spacecraft separation is scheduled for 10.5 hours after launch! This is a long flight profile, very complicated. It isn't something out of the ordinary for Proton-M/Briz-M: most GEO missions have spacecraft separation at T+9-10h.
Quote from: eeergo on 02/17/2016 10:21 amQuote from: Svetoslav on 02/17/2016 09:21 amESA has published a video of simulation of the launch:So far I haven't seen the trajectory of Briz-M and how many burns are planed. But my goodness, spacecraft separation is scheduled for 10.5 hours after launch! This is a long flight profile, very complicated. It isn't something out of the ordinary for Proton-M/Briz-M: most GEO missions have spacecraft separation at T+9-10h.Are the extended missions these days more influenced by launch site location or launcher performance?
Quote from: Star One on 02/17/2016 12:10 pmQuote from: eeergo on 02/17/2016 10:21 amQuote from: Svetoslav on 02/17/2016 09:21 amESA has published a video of simulation of the launch:So far I haven't seen the trajectory of Briz-M and how many burns are planed. But my goodness, spacecraft separation is scheduled for 10.5 hours after launch! This is a long flight profile, very complicated. It isn't something out of the ordinary for Proton-M/Briz-M: most GEO missions have spacecraft separation at T+9-10h.Are the extended missions these days more influenced by launch site location or launcher performance?I understand the long mission durations are mostly related to the low thrust of the S5.98 engine, and so require several coast phases for maneuvers that could be compressed into a single burn with a higher thrust system.
This is not a GEO insertion mission. This is an escape mission. Latitude does not really matter, as long as you do the burn on the opposite node of your escape vector. And given Oberth effect, it's more efficient to do it as low as possible. Since Mars insertion plane is surely below 17deg, I would guess they will have to go to LEO, coast almost half an orbit until it actually is on the opposite node, and then burn to depletion.
Re: Proton-launched interplanetary missionsProton has not been used to launch an interplanetary mission since Mars '96, and before that for the two Fobos craft in 1988.These flights used Blok-D upper stages.
Quote from: zubenelgenubi on 02/18/2016 04:22 pmRe: Proton-launched interplanetary missionsProton has not been used to launch an interplanetary mission since Mars '96, and before that for the two Fobos craft in 1988.These flights used Blok-D upper stages.So this is all untried territory.
Scientists want to avoid inadvertently sending microbes from Earth to Mars because they could ruin research into ancient Martian history aimed at determining whether the planet ever harbored life of its own.The Baikonur Cosmodrome did not have facilities capable of such stringent modern “planetary protection” standards, officials said, so the ExoMars team brought extra gear to meet the cleanliness requirement.Workers hoisted Schiaparelli atop the Trace Gas Orbiter on Feb. 12 and mated the lander to its carrier craft with 27 screws, which connected a separation assembly between the two modules. When the lander deploys from the orbiter Oct. 16, three days before both spacecraft arrive at Mars, springs on the separation apparatus will push Schiaparelli away, according to a description posted on ESA’s website.
Primarily developed and financed by Italy, Schiaparelli could encounter temperatures as high as 3,360 degrees Fahrenheit (1,850 degrees Celsius) during the plunge through the Martian atmosphere.With Schiaparelli now together with the Trace Gas Orbiter, the combined spacecraft stands more than 3 meters (10 feet) tall.The next step to ready the spacecraft for launch will be the fueling of the orbiter with its own propellant supply in the coming week. The orbiter’s total propellant load will be about 2.3 metric tons — more than 5,000 pounds — giving the combined spacecraft a mass of 4.3 metric tons — about 9,480 pounds — at the time of liftoff.
http://www.roscosmos.ru/21958/Roscosmos announces that the Proton-M rocket has been delivered to Baykonur for 14 march launch date.