Quote from: Targeteer on 09/18/2011 12:59 amQuote from: Blackstar on 09/17/2011 07:23 pm1. The corrogated metal skin is really surprising. 2.Could it fly in space that way or is it just a temporary covering of the engineering model?1. Not really, that's how standard aerospace structures look like2. there would be MLI on it.
Quote from: Blackstar on 09/17/2011 07:23 pm1. The corrogated metal skin is really surprising. 2.Could it fly in space that way or is it just a temporary covering of the engineering model?
Back from the party. Very tired.A few things:-the film in the HEXAGON moved at 17 feet PER SECOND.-the entire film path for the HEXAGON was pressurized.-there are a couple more KH-7s still sitting in storage.-best resolution on the KH-8 was 2.3 inches.That's it. I'm tired.
Quote from: Blackstar on 09/18/2011 03:36 amBack from the party. Very tired.A few things:-the film in the HEXAGON moved at 17 feet PER SECOND.-the entire film path for the HEXAGON was pressurized.-there are a couple more KH-7s still sitting in storage.-best resolution on the KH-8 was 2.3 inches.That's it. I'm tired.Interesting they revealed the 2.3 inch best resolution verbally because it's redacted from all of the documents I've plowed through so far...
Interesting they revealed the 2.3 inch best resolution verbally because it's redacted from all of the documents I've plowed through so far...
Quote from: Targeteer on 09/18/2011 03:47 amInteresting they revealed the 2.3 inch best resolution verbally because it's redacted from all of the documents I've plowed through so far...They did not. Somebody did. To me.
1-The story I got was that between the main film storage spool (which could contain 60 miles of film) and the camera image plate there was a temporary "buffer" where film could be held in readiness for a high-speed imaging run. The main spool could not deliver film at this speed. The film transport system was certainly a major engineering achievement.I managed to cadge a press kit, which contained a bit more than the fact sheets, but the NRO web site now has a lot more information.2-Pity the light level in the tent was too poor for my photo camera with no flash.Ed.: I meant my cell phone camera.
Time for math in public--always scary. 60 miles of film X 5280 feet = 316,800 feet316,800 feet / 17 feet per second = 18,635 seconds (of imaging)18,635 seconds / 60 seconds per minutes = 310 minutes (of imaging)310 minutes / 60 minutes per hour = 5.2 hours total hours of imaging spread over a 2-9 month mission. Timing and usage of the available film was obviously of paramount importance.
Was there any discussion of imagery release?
1. Thanks to Jim and others for the replies. Pictures I've seen of more current satellites don't appear as "rudimentary" although they usually have MLI or thermal foil of some type installed.2. Another question, would the structure be painted in space? I would think that would be a debris source but maybe the model has it for long term storage on the ground.
Quote from: Targeteer on 09/18/2011 04:52 amWas there any discussion of imagery release? No. I talked to somebody who was not involved but had apparently asked the people who were involved and based on his response I got the sense that it was a touchy subject--NRO wanted it to happen, but NGA is not exactly enthusiastic.
NSF forum: Applause please for Blackstar...................