Author Topic: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion Thread 1  (Read 790211 times)

Online gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10205
  • US
  • Liked: 13885
  • Likes Given: 5933
NSF Threads for Falcon Heavy Demo : Updates / Discussion Thread 1 / Discussion Thread 2 / Member Meetup / Cape Canaveral Launch Viewing / FH Demo Mission Payload Discussion / FH Demo Discussion and Speculation / FH Demo Payload Speculation / L2 Coverage November-December - January-February / ASDS / Party

NSF Articles for Falcon Heavy Demo :
   [April 12, 2017] Falcon Heavy build up begins; SLC-40 pad rebuild progressing well
   [April 25, 2017] SpaceX Static Fire spy sat rocket and prepare to test Falcon Heavy core
   [Nov. 1, 2017] SpaceX aims for late-December launch of Falcon Heavy
   [Dec. 30, 2017] Falcon Heavy preparing for Static Fire test
   [Jan. 24, 2018] Falcon Heavy comes to life as SpaceX conduct Static Fire test
   [Feb. 5/6, 2018] SpaceX successfully debuts Falcon Heavy in demonstration launch from KSC
   [Feb. 9, 2018] Falcon Heavy success paves the way for open access to space beyond Earth

Successful launch Feb 6th at 1545 EST/2045 UTC from LC-39A at KSC carrying Tesla Roadster with Starman mannequin (mass around 1200 kg?).  Launch vehicle used a new center booster (1033) and reused side boosters (1023.2, 1025.2).  The side boosters successfully landed back at LZ-1 and LZ-2 at CCAFS.  The center core crashed into the ocean very close to the ASDS.



Now that we're starting to see hardware flow for the first FH, let's keep discussion in this new mission thread a bit more focused.  Discussion here should be about stuff we actually know about the mission.  Any speculation about Dragons carrying school buses made of cheese will be deleted.  There is still a thread you can use for speculation.

We're waiting for photos, but Gary for L2 McGregor is reporting FH side booster on the test stand! :)



Other SpaceX resources on NASASpaceflight:
   SpaceX News Articles (Recent)  /   SpaceX News Articles from 2006 (Including numerous exclusive Elon interviews)
   SpaceX Dragon Articles  /  SpaceX Missions Section (with Launch Manifest and info on past and future missions)
   L2 SpaceX Section
« Last Edit: 02/11/2018 03:31 pm by gongora »

Online Chris Bergin

Hi Res set from Gary Blair (taken from a public area...as always) going into L2 over the coming hours, but this is a big milestone, so passing on at least a preview as "Conehead" is cool.

We believe this is 1023 (formerly the leaning Tower of Thaicom-8). One of the two flight proven S1's that will be with the Falcon Heavy debut.
« Last Edit: 04/09/2017 02:38 am by gongora »
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Online Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6466
  • Liked: 4572
  • Likes Given: 5136
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #2 on: 04/09/2017 05:17 pm »
"Conehead"  Very good.  "We're NOT from France!" ;)

It is interesting that the guy wires are attached outside of the cone. 
Would this make for more rapid processing, not needing to take off the cone for test firing? 
Can they transport the stage from Hawthorne and to Florida with the cone attached? 
Isn't it said that the first stage is already at the length limit for transport? 
If they have to take off the cone for transport, why not use the standard (or slightly modified) cap for test firing? 
Why build this capability into flight hardware?
« Last Edit: 04/09/2017 05:18 pm by Comga »
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline cppetrie

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 792
  • Liked: 552
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #3 on: 04/09/2017 05:23 pm »
"Conehead"  Very good.  "We're NOT from France!" ;)

It is interesting that the guy wires are attached outside of the cone. 
Would this make for more rapid processing, not needing to take off the cone for test firing? 
Can they transport the stage from Hawthorne and to Florida with the cone attached? 
Isn't it said that the first stage is already at the length limit for transport? 
If they have to take off the cone for transport, why not use the standard (or slightly modified) cap for test firing? 
Why build this capability into flight hardware?
Does the first stage normally transports with an interstage? If so, it might be that the cone replaces the interstage and doesn't add to the overall length of the rocket for transport. There is no reason for the nosecap to be easily removable since it isn't coming off inflight so it makes some sense to attach it semi-permanently at the factory and design a rig for testing with the cone already in place.

Just my 2 cents.

Online rberry

  • Member
  • Posts: 32
  • Houston
  • Liked: 23
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #4 on: 04/09/2017 05:30 pm »
"Conehead"  Very good.  "We're NOT from France!" ;)

It is interesting that the guy wires are attached outside of the cone. 
Would this make for more rapid processing, not needing to take off the cone for test firing? 
Can they transport the stage from Hawthorne and to Florida with the cone attached? 
Isn't it said that the first stage is already at the length limit for transport? 
If they have to take off the cone for transport, why not use the standard (or slightly modified) cap for test firing? 
Why build this capability into flight hardware?

I believe it was transported from Hawthorne to McGregor with the nose cone attached, so presumably it could also be transported to Florida.

*Edit Attached Image https://imgur.com/a/Vbxrx#zPdInH5
« Last Edit: 04/09/2017 05:34 pm by rberry »
-Ryan

Offline old_sellsword

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 632
  • Liked: 531
  • Likes Given: 470
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #5 on: 04/09/2017 05:43 pm »
Does the first stage normally transports with an interstage?

Yes.

If so, it might be that the cone replaces the interstage and doesn't add to the overall length of the rocket for transport.

The nose cone replaces the interstage, and it appears to be quite a bit shorter.

Online Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6466
  • Liked: 4572
  • Likes Given: 5136
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #6 on: 04/09/2017 11:33 pm »
"Conehead"  Very good.  "We're NOT from France!" ;)

It is interesting that the guy wires are attached outside of the cone. 
Would this make for more rapid processing, not needing to take off the cone for test firing? 
Can they transport the stage from Hawthorne and to Florida with the cone attached? 
Isn't it said that the first stage is already at the length limit for transport? 
If they have to take off the cone for transport, why not use the standard (or slightly modified) cap for test firing? 
Why build this capability into flight hardware?

I believe it was transported from Hawthorne to McGregor with the nose cone attached, so presumably it could also be transported to Florida.

I didn't "fix" your quote.  Just colored it. ;)
I had forgotten that photo.  Thanks
So what are people's opinion of having the hold-down's as part of the "conehead"?
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline cppetrie

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 792
  • Liked: 552
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #7 on: 04/09/2017 11:42 pm »
So what are people's opinion of having the hold-down's as part of the "conehead"?

I don't think there are hard connections from the wires to the cone. It looks like there is just the gray metal ring that "sits" on/around the cone and the wires attach to the ring. Since the ring sits nearly all the way down where the cone attaches to the stage it should be able to carry the load into the stage without fixed attachment points. Think of it as a crown for the conehead. That's my impression from the photo anyway.
« Last Edit: 04/09/2017 11:43 pm by cppetrie »

Online Chris Bergin

Article for the side booster at McGregor, by Chris Gebhardt:

https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2017/04/falcon-heavy-build-up-slc-40-pad-rebuild-progressing/

1023.2 may static fire at McGregor as early as today (Wednesday).
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline vaporcobra

In light of reports that a core stage may have been set to static fire last week, I browsed the SpaceX tag on Instagram and came across this. Photo posted (not sure if taken) Saturday of the McGregor test site, and strongly suggests that 1023.2 did indeed have an apparently successful SF.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BS6nzBPDwed/

Offline DLK

  • Member
  • Posts: 33
  • Monrovia, AL
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 133
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #10 on: 04/18/2017 03:41 pm »
It appears that it 'consumed mass quantites' of propellant indeed.

Offline Flying Beaver

In light of reports that a core stage may have been set to static fire last week, I browsed the SpaceX tag on Instagram and came across this. Photo posted (not sure if taken) Saturday of the McGregor test site, and strongly suggests that 1023.2 did indeed have an apparently successful SF.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BS6nzBPDwed/

Wrong stand. You can see the old tripod stand to the right, the booster stand is right beside it, further to the right out of frame.

This test's vapor plume is better placed for Raptor, as it's stand is a ways to the north of the booster, as well as Merlin, testing areas.
Watched B1019 land in person 21/12/2015.

Offline old_sellsword

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 632
  • Liked: 531
  • Likes Given: 470
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #12 on: 04/18/2017 04:51 pm »
In light of reports that a core stage may have been set to static fire last week, I browsed the SpaceX tag on Instagram and came across this. Photo posted (not sure if taken) Saturday of the McGregor test site, and strongly suggests that 1023.2 did indeed have an apparently successful SF.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BS6nzBPDwed/

Wrong stand. You can see the old tripod stand to the right, the booster stand is right beside it, further to the right out of frame.

This test's vapor plume is better placed for Raptor, as it's stand is a ways to the north of the booster, as well as Merlin, testing areas.

With the water tower on the right of the tripod, this is likely looking south-ish, not north. Meaning the plume is probably coming from the small site where they test Merlins.

Offline Flying Beaver

Interesting note on the supposed FH core sighted yesterday. Around the aft engine section there seems to be loads of coloured tape.

Without a closer look it's only guessing, but I was thinking they could be messages from Hawthorne employees, sending the first FH core on it's way.

It's a bit out there ;D

From here: https://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/65z8yi/falcon_spotting_sighting_in_marana_az_im_pretty/?ref=share&ref_source=link
Watched B1019 land in person 21/12/2015.

Offline Ronsmytheiii

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23394
  • Liked: 1879
  • Likes Given: 1023
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #14 on: 04/19/2017 04:19 pm »
Here is an image of the core back at Hawthorne:

https://www.instagram.com/roninchausti/

Edit more:

https://www.instagram.com/p/BS-PgO-FX6L/
« Last Edit: 04/19/2017 04:20 pm by Ronsmytheiii »

Offline enzo

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 137
  • USA
  • Liked: 118
  • Likes Given: 884
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #15 on: 04/21/2017 04:31 am »
Interesting note on the supposed FH core sighted yesterday. Around the aft engine section there seems to be loads of coloured tape.

Without a closer look it's only guessing, but I was thinking they could be messages from Hawthorne employees, sending the first FH core on it's way.

It's a bit out there ;D

From here: https://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/65z8yi/falcon_spotting_sighting_in_marana_az_im_pretty/?ref=share&ref_source=link
Would be cute, but I think some kind of color artifact due to the reflective qualities of the black plastic combined with cheap phone camera.

Online Chris Bergin

1023.2 has been taken off the McGregor stand and look who's taken its place, 1033.

(The bit you want to see from Gary Blair's L2 McGregor set:)

« Last Edit: 04/22/2017 08:56 am by Chris Bergin »
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline AncientU

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6257
  • Liked: 4164
  • Likes Given: 6078
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #17 on: 04/22/2017 01:23 pm »
Five days from Hawthorne to on stand at McGregor.
Nice.
"If we shared everything [we are working on] people would think we are insane!"
-- SpaceX friend of mlindner

Offline Kaputnik

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3079
  • Liked: 722
  • Likes Given: 821
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #18 on: 04/22/2017 10:19 pm »
I've never been so excited by the letter 'H' before. Makes it seem suddenly very real.
"I don't care what anything was DESIGNED to do, I care about what it CAN do"- Gene Kranz

Offline sevenperforce

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1474
  • Liked: 969
  • Likes Given: 599
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #19 on: 04/23/2017 04:34 am »
Oh, that's a beautiful sight. Love seeing where the core connections are.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1