No boil-off worries if the H2 is kept as water, much more flexibility too: you can now use this water in your radiation shielding much more easily that using liquid H2, or anywhere else it is needed.
If The energy requirements are comparable with the traditional pure H2 methods, then this option solves the cryogenic storage of H2 in transit problem. No boil-off worries if the H2 is kept as water, much more flexibility too: you can now use this water in your radiation shielding much more easily that using liquid H2, or anywhere else it is needed.Also Any local source of hydrogen (which is going to be water) will not need electrolysis before being used to make methane out of CO2. That at least might save a lot of energy even if the first idea doesn't pan out.
Quote from: LegendCJS on 04/11/2012 05:45 pmNo boil-off worries if the H2 is kept as water, much more flexibility too: you can now use this water in your radiation shielding much more easily that using liquid H2, or anywhere else it is needed.The transit habitat and the ISRU equipment are usually on different flights. The idea is that the crew doesn't launch until they know they can get back.Also, water is 45% of the final propellant mass (more if you run fuel-rich), whereas pure hydrogen is only 5%.Trade space...