Author Topic: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3  (Read 642670 times)

Offline StraumliBlight

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4379
  • UK
  • Liked: 6349
  • Likes Given: 941
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #1060 on: 06/25/2025 11:42 pm »
OIG: Semiannual Report to Congress Spring 2025 [May 30]

Quote
Texas Resident Sentenced for Burglary

As the result of a joint investigation by the NASA OIG and Houston Police Department, a Texas resident was sentenced to 12 months of imprisonment for breaking into a SpaceX leased building and stealing five encrypted iPads containing unspecified Commercial Crew Program information.

Offline thespacecow

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1253
  • e/acc
  • Liked: 1191
  • Likes Given: 519
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #1061 on: 09/28/2025 04:09 am »
Random thought of the day: With ISS near retirement, the necessity of maintaining two crew transport providers for redundancy is going away. Presumably every one of the new commercial stations can run unmanned for extended amount of time, and they don't need to worry about Russians taking over the station without American presence. If they just rely on a single crew provider, and it has an accident and had to stand down for a while, it's not a big deal operationally. There would be some financial penalties for not being able to use the station for some time, but this needs to be balanced against the higher cost of having 2nd provider, it's not clear to me a 2nd provider would make financial sense.

Offline DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9342
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 7504
  • Likes Given: 3226
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #1062 on: 09/28/2025 03:36 pm »
Random thought of the day: With ISS near retirement, the necessity of maintaining two crew transport providers for redundancy is going away. Presumably every one of the new commercial stations can run unmanned for extended amount of time, and they don't need to worry about Russians taking over the station without American presence. If they just rely on a single crew provider, and it has an accident and had to stand down for a while, it's not a big deal operationally. There would be some financial penalties for not being able to use the station for some time, but this needs to be balanced against the higher cost of having 2nd provider, it's not clear to me a 2nd provider would make financial sense.
Sadly, we need to worry about politics. There is another crewed spacecraft in operation, and at one point was even rumored to have an IDSS-compatible docking port:
    Shenzhou
Later reports appear to say that is is APAS-compatible instead, but their engineers should be able to modify the design.
« Last Edit: 09/30/2025 01:05 pm by DanClemmensen »

Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2843
  • Liked: 826
  • Likes Given: 1385
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #1063 on: 01/14/2026 11:56 pm »
I hope nobody is suggesting that Shenzhou is a threat
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Offline DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9342
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 7504
  • Likes Given: 3226
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #1064 on: 01/15/2026 03:47 pm »
I hope nobody is suggesting that Shenzhou is a threat
Not a threat. In a rational world, spacefarers would try to help each other in an emergency, and this would include emergency rescue for any stranded crew using any spacecraft with the capability to do so. This has been historically true at sea for hundreds of years.
« Last Edit: 01/15/2026 04:24 pm by DanClemmensen »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0