I voted 2022. SpaceX wants to shift to Starlink V2.2 as soon as possible and I think they will begin launching them on Starship even before Starship is really reliable, including on deliberately expended Starship test launches. There's a reason the very first orbital test Starship is a Starlink dispenser. But Starlink accounts for almost 50% of F9 launches.
So far, I'm the only schmuck to choose 'after 2025'. My reasoning is that SH/SS will start getting additional payloads beyond Starlink once it's reliability is proven a little more. Especially if the cost point is below a recovered F9 (as it's widely expected to be). Another reason is tanker launches - OP didn't say those were not included in 'launch'!
Quote from: DanClemmensen on 06/21/2022 03:15 pmI voted 2022. SpaceX wants to shift to Starlink V2.2 as soon as possible and I think they will begin launching them on Starship even before Starship is really reliable, including on deliberately expended Starship test launches. There's a reason the very first orbital test Starship is a Starlink dispenser. But Starlink accounts for almost 50% of F9 launches.You've convinced me Dan. If one Starship replaces 10 F9 Starlink launches, it might take only two or three Starship launches to drop below the number of launches in 2022, depending on distribution in different orbital planes.
Quote from: marsbase on 06/21/2022 04:34 pmQuote from: DanClemmensen on 06/21/2022 03:15 pmI voted 2022. SpaceX wants to shift to Starlink V2.2 as soon as possible and I think they will begin launching them on Starship even before Starship is really reliable, including on deliberately expended Starship test launches. There's a reason the very first orbital test Starship is a Starlink dispenser. But Starlink accounts for almost 50% of F9 launches.You've convinced me Dan. If one Starship replaces 10 F9 Starlink launches, it might take only two or three Starship launches to drop below the number of launches in 2022, depending on distribution in different orbital planes.But they won't be direct replacements. Instead, they will quit flying any new V1.x satellites completely, and will start flying V2.x satellites instead. I think (but am not sure) that a V2.x can occupy a slot in the existing constellation that could have been occupied by a V1.x, and SpaceX will eventually replace all V1.x with V2.x. A Starship launch does not replace 10 F9 launches (about 10x50 satellites). A Starship "Pez dispenser" carries about 54 satellites, we think. so: one-for-one launch replacement, but with satellites that are more than 10 times as capable. But by the end of 2023 they may be launching once a day.
Quote from: DanClemmensen on 06/21/2022 06:48 pmQuote from: marsbase on 06/21/2022 04:34 pmQuote from: DanClemmensen on 06/21/2022 03:15 pmI voted 2022. SpaceX wants to shift to Starlink V2.2 as soon as possible and I think they will begin launching them on Starship even before Starship is really reliable, including on deliberately expended Starship test launches. There's a reason the very first orbital test Starship is a Starlink dispenser. But Starlink accounts for almost 50% of F9 launches.You've convinced me Dan. If one Starship replaces 10 F9 Starlink launches, it might take only two or three Starship launches to drop below the number of launches in 2022, depending on distribution in different orbital planes.But they won't be direct replacements. Instead, they will quit flying any new V1.x satellites completely, and will start flying V2.x satellites instead. I think (but am not sure) that a V2.x can occupy a slot in the existing constellation that could have been occupied by a V1.x, and SpaceX will eventually replace all V1.x with V2.x. A Starship launch does not replace 10 F9 launches (about 10x50 satellites). A Starship "Pez dispenser" carries about 54 satellites, we think. so: one-for-one launch replacement, but with satellites that are more than 10 times as capable. But by the end of 2023 they may be launching once a day. I did not realize that the pez dispenser only carries 54 Starlinks. So most of the volume in the payload section is empty? And given weight capacities, that means the Starships will carry only a fraction of the possible weight to orbit? Or are the V2 starlinks very heavy?
Falcon 9 will eventually retire as Starship operations increase, and at some point the F9 launch cadence will decline. Since Starlink forms a large percentage of F9 launches, this might happen soon.To be pedantic, for purposes of this poll a F9 launch shall count as one launch, and a FH launch shall count as one launch. A launch counts if the vehicle clears the pad, whether or not the mission is successful and whether or not a recovery is attempted or succeeds.
Quote from: DanClemmensen on 06/21/2022 02:17 pmFalcon 9 will eventually retire as Starship operations increase, and at some point the F9 launch cadence will decline. Since Starlink forms a large percentage of F9 launches, this might happen soon.To be pedantic, for purposes of this poll a F9 launch shall count as one launch, and a FH launch shall count as one launch. A launch counts if the vehicle clears the pad, whether or not the mission is successful and whether or not a recovery is attempted or succeeds.How will we know when the peak is achieved? Couldn't there be 50 in 2022, 49 in 2023, and 51 in 2024, or some later year?
I voted 2023 but low confidenceh2 2022 has 30 commercial launches per wikipediawhole of 2023 only 29.2022 could reach 60: q1 13 q2 16 so another 31 in h2 seems doable.some will slip from 2022 to 2023 and there will be more not yet announcedPeople won't be comfortable or even able to book starship for a while yetSo I am guess / suggesting2022 602023 622024 onward dropping - possibly to under 50, under 25, under 10, 0and I will probably be miles out with these numbers and pattern.
Quote from: hplan on 06/21/2022 08:00 pmQuote from: DanClemmensen on 06/21/2022 02:17 pmFalcon 9 will eventually retire as Starship operations increase, and at some point the F9 launch cadence will decline. Since Starlink forms a large percentage of F9 launches, this might happen soon.To be pedantic, for purposes of this poll a F9 launch shall count as one launch, and a FH launch shall count as one launch. A launch counts if the vehicle clears the pad, whether or not the mission is successful and whether or not a recovery is attempted or succeeds.How will we know when the peak is achieved? Couldn't there be 50 in 2022, 49 in 2023, and 51 in 2024, or some later year?I think the pool sort of presupposes that a reason for the peak would be F9 being gradually eclipsed by some other launch system. So, yes, it could wiggle around like that, but … maybe “but that’s not what the poll is thinking about”? If we wanted it to be way longer winded it could be something like “when will F9 launches start to meaningfully decline from whatever the peak rate is?”. But I’m happy as is.
Quote from: crandles57 on 06/21/2022 09:20 pmI voted 2023 but low confidenceh2 2022 has 30 commercial launches per wikipediawhole of 2023 only 29.2022 could reach 60: q1 13 q2 16 so another 31 in h2 seems doable.some will slip from 2022 to 2023 and there will be more not yet announcedPeople won't be comfortable or even able to book starship for a while yetSo I am guess / suggesting2022 602023 622024 onward dropping - possibly to under 50, under 25, under 10, 0and I will probably be miles out with these numbers and pattern.There will be F9 launches for one Crew Dragon and two(?) Cargo Dragons per year probably until 2029 at least, because NASA crew qualification and ISS docking permission for Starship will be tedious. There will likely be about 14 total NSSL flights for F9 and FH between now and 2026. Unless Artemis changes, there will be an FH for Gateway PPE-HALO, and one FH Dragon XL mission per year(?) for several years. SpaceX will make it economically very attractive to move to Starship for everything else, I think.
My 0 could well be too soon. 0-5 might well be more sensible for a few more yearsIf Starship goes well quickly getting to 50+ consecutive successful missions, they will want Starship certified as quickly as possible even if it is long and tedious process. If there are delays creating like 3 year gaps in Artemis missions could SpaceX just say we are scrapping Falcon9 and Falcon Heavy and refuse any further *and long delayed* bookings?Is that just inappropriate pressure to get certification done quickly or would it work?
An additional poll might be when will be the last F9 Starlink launch?