Author Topic: SpaceX Starship : Texas Prototype(s) Thread 18 : Discussion  (Read 316775 times)

Offline Chris Bergin

New thread (18) for discussion of the Starship prototype being built in Boca Chica, Texas.  Previous posts on these prototypes can be found in these threads:

Discussion 1

Discussion 2

Discussion 3

Discussion 4

Discussion 5

Discussion 6

Discussion 7

Discussion 8

Discussion 9

Discussion 10

Discussion 11

Discussion 12

Discussion 13

Discussion 14

Discussion 15

Discussion 16

Discussion 17


Thread 18 - you're in it!

UPDATES:

SpaceX BFS : Phase 2 - Starship Orbital Prototype(s) - Photos and Updates -3 (Previous)

SpaceX Boca Chica - Production Updates - MASTER Thread (4) (New/Current)

Starship SN9 Test Launch - UPDATES (New/Current).

Starship SN10 Test Launch - UPDATES (New/Current).

---

Follow NSF Twitter:
https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight

---

NSF Youtube Channel with hundreds of original Starship videos:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSUu1lih2RifWkKtDOJdsBA

Supporting NSF and the team

Members of Red Team or higher get early clips pre-edit and more. Capcom and higher get access to our team Discord.

Subscribe and hit notifications for instant alerts of new videos as that'll be the first you'll see for a new video going live.

--

L2 Boca Chica (intense level updates - Master Thread from Day 1 to today)
Now with advanced clips from Mary's videos and unique content.

*Also now with standalone Starship L2 threads onwards for SN8, 9 and 10*

---

Store, with Boca Chica merch:

https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/shop/

---

RULES

There are 10s of millions of views on these Starship threads, so remember when you post your post is being viewed by a lot of people. Make sure you're posting something interesting:

Stay on topic (don't wander, use new or other threads). This is ONLY about discussing the prototypes
Make sure your post is useful and adding something. Failure to do so will see your post removed.

This Starship Section has many millions of views, and threads with a lot of bandwidth/data (we're not text only like Reddit (who also make a ton of money), we have photos and files hosted on our servers here. If you can support this site, please do via L2. It's a very expensive place to host and only viable if we have enough L2 support).
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5324
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 7948
  • Likes Given: 36
Since it got lost at the tail of the last thread: new internal baffle ring for the LCH4 header tank.

Online WiresMN

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 430
  • Likes Given: 257
Since it got lost at the tail of the last thread: new internal baffle ring for the LCH4 header tank.

Has this style of baffle been used in the CH4 tank before?

Offline raivo45

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 302
  • Liked: 277
  • Likes Given: 389
Since it got lost at the tail of the last thread: new internal baffle ring for the LCH4 header tank.

Has this style of baffle been used in the CH4 tank before?
I'm pretty sure we saw one inside the header tank of SN9 after the explosion, and it can also be seen in a picture of SN4(I think) that Elon shared on twitter on April 6 2020. So it has probably been there from the start.

Online Haur

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 115
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 154
  • Likes Given: 18
Since it got lost at the tail of the last thread: new internal baffle ring for the LCH4 header tank.

Has this style of baffle been used in the CH4 tank before?
I'm pretty sure we saw one inside the header tank of SN9 after the explosion, and it can also be seen in a picture of SN4(I think) that Elon shared on twitter on April 6 2020. So it has probably been there from the start.

At least as far back as SN8, as shown in Steve Jurvetson's photos.

Perhaps more visible in the SN9 wreckage due to the header tank popping itself in half, though, as in this image from bocachicagal. The SN4 image is a bit hard to tell, but doesn't look quite the same as this.

Offline _MECO

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 722
  • Central KY, USA
  • Liked: 775
  • Likes Given: 447
Since it got lost at the tail of the last thread: new internal baffle ring for the LCH4 header tank.

Has this style of baffle been used in the CH4 tank before?
I'm pretty sure we saw one inside the header tank of SN9 after the explosion, and it can also be seen in a picture of SN4(I think) that Elon shared on twitter on April 6 2020. So it has probably been there from the start.

At least as far back as SN8, as shown in Steve Jurvetson's photos.

Perhaps more visible in the SN9 wreckage due to the header tank popping itself in half, though, as in this image from bocachicagal. The SN4 image is a bit hard to tell, but doesn't look quite the same as this.

Interesting that the baffle is oriented to Starship's vertical position. I guess it needs to really prevent sloshing when Starship is horizontal i.e. when that baffle is vertical.

Also, I spend like a good 5 or 10 minutes writing a post explaining how inspired the community and the stuff happening in Texas is making me. It almost immediately garners six, ten likes from people. Maybe it's in the wrong thread, maybe not, but the boot deletes it and doesn't even inform me. No move to the homeless posts thread, not even evidence I ever posted it. Nice 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
« Last Edit: 03/04/2021 08:37 am by _MECO »

Offline Semmel

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
  • Germany
  • Liked: 2420
  • Likes Given: 11897
Watching Texas Tank Watchers... (hey boss, if you read this, I mostly only listen and work on my stuff until excitement starts..)

I have to say, super impressed with the turbulence mitigation. I work in ground based astronomy and turbulence is a big deal for us. In astronomy, you dont get a video stream of the sky, instead you look at a small patch and have long exposures. You dont want to read out the sensor too often to reduce read out noise. But that means that turbulence will smear out your image. So it doesnt look wiggly as in the stream, it looks blurry. In telescopes you take a bright star and use a second camera that watches through the scope to observe the wiggliness of the extra star. This is used to change the shape of a highly flexible mirror just in the right way to take out the wiggles. This is super complicated, requires a small supercomputer, and a very expensive mirror shaping system. This is called adaptive optics. Sometimes, if no suitable stars are available, artificial stars are generated in the upper atmosphere, which is why you see sometimes telescopes shoot eff-ing lasers into the sky. This just tells you what LENGTH the astronomers go to deal with atmospheric turbulence.

You did it on a video stream, basically in real time, in software, based on the image alone. I guess you didnt invent this but used some existing software for that, but I must say, its very impressive and my hat is off to who ever created that. I can only guess how it works... maybe detect edges in the image, compute a de-turbulization map to straighten the edges out, and apply that to the entire image. In any case, super good result!

Offline cuddihy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1238
  • Liked: 571
  • Likes Given: 922
Any theories on why SpaceX has posted no link yet to a live stream on their website?
https://www.spacex.com/vehicles/starship/index.html

Offline Eagandale4114

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 283
  • Liked: 510
  • Likes Given: 475
Any theories on why SpaceX has posted no link yet to a live stream on their website?
https://www.spacex.com/vehicles/starship/index.html

For SN - 9 they posted it around T-10.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38628
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 67026
  • Likes Given: 29696
Ouch ...

https://twitter.com/sciguyspace/status/1367185551804219396

Quote
Sticky valve in Boca? Does this mean the Starship launch system is down for six weeks?

Offline mrhuggy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 642
  • East Yorkshire, UK
  • Liked: 417
  • Likes Given: 14
Re: SpaceX Starship : Texas Prototype(s) Thread 18 : Discussion
« Reply #10 on: 03/03/2021 06:08 pm »
More vehicles arriving at the build site including a truck.
Normal, not a bad sign. There were other vehicles coming and going outside of the roadblock earlier too. We heard over the Starhopper PA during SN9's test flight that build site workers only evacuate to west of the Stargate building a short time before the flight begins.

Still only four cars parked outside the tank farm. At least one worker running around frantically. (Per LabPadre Lab Cam)

Yhea they took the other turning rather than going down the road. I haven't seen anything of them since.

Offline Oersted

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2704
  • Liked: 3764
  • Likes Given: 2602
Re: SpaceX Starship : Texas Prototype(s) Thread 18 : Discussion
« Reply #11 on: 03/03/2021 06:31 pm »
habemus white vapour.

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5324
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 7948
  • Likes Given: 36
Re: SpaceX Starship : Texas Prototype(s) Thread 18 : Discussion
« Reply #12 on: 03/03/2021 06:59 pm »
Have SpaceX (or the FAA) confirmed SN10's target altitude?

::EDIT:: SpaceX stream. 10km.
« Last Edit: 03/03/2021 07:17 pm by edzieba »

Offline Giggleplex7

  • Member
  • Posts: 30
  • Canada
  • Liked: 26
  • Likes Given: 857
Re: SpaceX Starship : Texas Prototype(s) Thread 18 : Discussion
« Reply #13 on: 03/03/2021 07:16 pm »
Looks like Raptors are still fickle.

Offline wrvn

  • Member
  • Posts: 14
  • Liked: 16
  • Likes Given: 26
Re: SpaceX Starship : Texas Prototype(s) Thread 18 : Discussion
« Reply #14 on: 03/03/2021 07:17 pm »
Have SpaceX (or the FAA) confirmed SN10's target altitude?

Its 10 km from SpaceX stream.

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6652
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 1617
  • Likes Given: 1535
Re: SpaceX Starship : Texas Prototype(s) Thread 18 : Discussion
« Reply #15 on: 03/03/2021 07:19 pm »
Understood it was an out-of-bounds thrust reading from a sensor that caused the abort, but was there any visual or auditory indication the startup was other than nominal?
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Online Rocketdog2116

  • Member
  • Posts: 59
  • Liked: 102
  • Likes Given: 282
Re: SpaceX Starship : Texas Prototype(s) Thread 18 : Discussion
« Reply #16 on: 03/03/2021 07:23 pm »
Understood it was an out-of-bounds thrust reading from a sensor that caused the abort, but was there any visual or auditory indication the startup was other than nominal?
It looked like the vapor that comes from the nozzles before actual combustion lasted longer than normal... maybe a slow start?

Offline 1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 360
  • El Segundo, CA
  • Liked: 728
  • Likes Given: 10
Re: SpaceX Starship : Texas Prototype(s) Thread 18 : Discussion
« Reply #17 on: 03/03/2021 07:32 pm »
I find myself wishing they'd turn this particular camera feed on for more than just test flight attempts. The sound of the wind and the rocket breathing is surprisingly relaxing.

Offline Slothman

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 482
  • Liked: 522
  • Likes Given: 26
Re: SpaceX Starship : Texas Prototype(s) Thread 18 : Discussion
« Reply #18 on: 03/03/2021 07:58 pm »
I find myself wishing they'd turn this particular camera feed on for more than just test flight attempts. The sound of the wind and the rocket breathing is surprisingly relaxing.

The rocket is not breathing like that for anything but tests. And you can get wind noises off of youtube any time.

Offline I14R10

  • Mars Terraformer
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 357
  • Croatia
  • Liked: 45
  • Likes Given: 225
Re: SpaceX Starship : Texas Prototype(s) Thread 18 : Discussion
« Reply #19 on: 03/03/2021 08:18 pm »
Why do they have to detank and then tank again? Couldn't they just fill it up a bit and try again?

 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0