So apparently a forgotten NASA concept called the standing oblique detonation ramjet engine (they call it sodramjet, but it might also be categorically called a shcramjet or ODWE?) was recently resurrected and physically demonstrated, and was published in a chinese academic journal.https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3111985/chinese-team-test-jet-engine-able-reach-anywhere-earth-within-2Sadly no obvious link to the chinese paper in the article, but a likely candidate is the followinghttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1000936120305227The source idea came from a NASA 1980 paper by Richard Morrison apparently.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search?q=ramjet&author=Morrison,%20R.%20B.The chinese researchers think highly of it, but this is a basic demonstration rig, and in no way represents a flight engine. The need to seed the inbound airflow with hydrogen via upstream fuel injector struts seems a bit problematic.I couldn't help but think, with the external fuel injection, it's not that far from the old flaming pumpkin seed external combustion scramjet concept...
I read the linked research paper. It seems like productive basic research on hypersonic combustion.The Popular Mechanics reporting is amazingly bad. The tone of the article is as if this test rig were a working missile. Science reporting is such a dumpster fire...
A Shanghai-based researcher studying hypersonic aerodynamics said the experiment was probably conducted “a while ago”. China’s hypersonic programme is much shrouded in secrecy because of its potential for military application, and the studies published in academic journals have been vetted carefully, he said.
The key quote from SCMP:The question is how long that 'while' is. If it's a few months or a year, then this is still in wind-tunnel mode or possibly just looking into strapping it to the nearest rocket as a flying test-bench. If that 'while' is closer to a decade, this could be into or post the standalone prototype vehicle stage and looking towards prototypes of operational vehicles.
I strongly doubt it will be enough to rid the US community of its fixation on the SCramjet as the only path to reliable M5+ flight.
Quote from: john smith 19 on 12/04/2020 06:18 amI strongly doubt it will be enough to rid the US community of its fixation on the SCramjet as the only path to reliable M5+ flight....Unless it is shown to actually work, in which case someone in the US community may deem the idea it worthy of consideration... before, eventually, returning to their previously-held fixation.
Quote from: CameronD on 12/08/2020 02:31 amQuote from: john smith 19 on 12/04/2020 06:18 amI strongly doubt it will be enough to rid the US community of its fixation on the SCramjet as the only path to reliable M5+ flight....Unless it is shown to actually work, in which case someone in the US community may deem the idea it worthy of consideration... before, eventually, returning to their previously-held fixation.I had hopes the pulse detonation engine would do this. Once someone funded it it proved quite easy to get a flight test model which seemed to work quite well. And that was that was heard from it.