Quote from: M.E.T. on 08/19/2021 03:16 am...As an alternative, Crew Dragon is listed as 4m in diameter and 8.1m high including its trunk. Could it not just enter sideways into the Starship cargo bay, close the Starship cargo bay door, pressurise the bay and the crew then exits in their shorts and t-shirts?Going have to deal with Dragon's hypergols. You really want to keep that stuff outside. Not necessarily a show stopper, but likely to complicate matters. The procedures for open atmosphere after landing to avoid hypergols are very strict. In an enclosed space... but that is another topic.
...As an alternative, Crew Dragon is listed as 4m in diameter and 8.1m high including its trunk. Could it not just enter sideways into the Starship cargo bay, close the Starship cargo bay door, pressurise the bay and the crew then exits in their shorts and t-shirts?
You're not going to want a multi-ton vehical floating free in a starship bay, even in micragravity, while people move around it. You need some kind of clamp anyway, so why not seal off the RCS ports before pressurizing?
...It will be easier to simply get the crew to sign the necessary FAA waiver, and launch them onboard the Starship. ...
Quote from: Hamish.Student on 08/19/2021 10:01 am...It will be easier to simply get the crew to sign the necessary FAA waiver, and launch them onboard the Starship. ...Not that simple. A waiver is not a magic piece of paper that cures all. They will still need a launch license from FAA (if commercial) or meet NASA requirements (if NASA personnel are on board). Both require a level of due diligence (FAA or NASA) well beyond someone simply signing a piece of paper.
Current FAA rules: https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/human_space_flight_reqs/
... In addition, launch operators are required to inform passengers of the risks of space travel generally and the risks of space travel in the operators vehicle in particular. ...
Quote from: rakaydos on 08/19/2021 11:31 amYou're not going to want a multi-ton vehical floating free in a starship bay, even in micragravity, while people move around it. You need some kind of clamp anyway, so why not seal off the RCS ports before pressurizing?Different issues, and a longer conversation for another thread IMO. Maybe "How would you use Starship as a mothership for Dragon?" or some-such.
Please stop this discussion about dragon inside starship because it is a complete absurd like every other idea of putting falcon second stage inside starship etc... Dragon is designed for docking end of topic.
Dragon II has hypergols on board, and CANNOT be stored inside Starship especially if a crew is on board.
Quote from: spacenut on 08/24/2021 03:15 amDragon II has hypergols on board, and CANNOT be stored inside Starship especially if a crew is on board.I find that partially muted by the fact that the STS orbiters flew payloads with hypergolic and/or solid propellant stages/spacecraft inside its payload bay. They were also certified for flying hydrolox Centaur upper stages prior to the cancellation of the first planned mission. Agena was also on the table for a time for VAFB SLC-6 DoD launches.
Is this new? If so, a small insight into starship interior plans
Put a professional like Mike L-A on the crew. Two would be even better. I don't care how automated this is supposed to