Poll

Given the June 18th explosion of Starship 36 on the test stand, when do you think SpaceX will launch Starship's Flight 10?

June/July 2025 -- 'Tis only a scratch!
1 (1.7%)
Aug 2025 -- Just a flesh wound
9 (15.5%)
Sep 2025 -- I've had worse
27 (46.6%)
Oct 2025 -- Your Arm's Off
14 (24.1%)
Nov/Dec 2025 -- What you going to do bleed on me?
5 (8.6%)
After Dec 2025 -- We'll call it a draw
2 (3.4%)
Never -- Elon throws in the towel or something else
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 58

Voting closed: 06/26/2025 02:34 am


Author Topic: #WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey  (Read 20054 times)

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7139
  • Erie, CO
  • Liked: 4727
  • Likes Given: 2708
#WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey
« on: 06/21/2025 02:34 am »
Ok, at the suggestions of a few people on the earlier #WenFlight10? poll (https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=62970.0), I'm creating this new poll for people to guess on the time given the test incident that destroyed Ship 36 this Wednesday. Poll will be open for five days.

Monty Python quotes/paraphrases riffing on Elon's "Just a scratch" tweet from yesterday (hopefully not offensive).

As with previous polls, please provide your thoughts on why you voted for a specific time.

~Jon
« Last Edit: 08/18/2025 08:33 pm by Chris Bergin »

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 41086
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 27090
  • Likes Given: 12768
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #1 on: 06/21/2025 02:40 am »
Ha! Perfect poll options.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Kaputnik

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3234
  • Liked: 864
  • Likes Given: 1080
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #2 on: 06/21/2025 03:18 am »
I previously voted September. Shifted back one month to October due to the loss of S36 and the damage to the test stand.
I think it's entirely possible that there is a longer delay and a jump straight to V3.
"I don't care what anything was DESIGNED to do, I care about what it CAN do"- Gene Kranz

Offline Llian Rhydderch

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1240
  • Terran Anglosphere
  • Liked: 1311
  • Likes Given: 9750
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #3 on: 06/21/2025 03:30 am »
Voted October, 'cause of the damage to ground equipment and likely need to order some complex weldments or special-order cryo tanks/pumps etc.

I, too, think it is entirely possible Musk pulls the plug on the v2 design/build, and just jumps ship to iteration v3.
Re arguments from authority on NSF:  "no one is exempt from error, and errors of authority are usually the worst kind.  Taking your word for things without question is no different than a bracket design not being tested because the designer was an old hand."
"You would actually save yourself time and effort if you were to use evidence and logic to make your points instead of wrapping yourself in the royal mantle of authority.  The approach only works on sheep, not inquisitive, intelligent people."

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8569
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 3017
  • Likes Given: 2749
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #4 on: 06/21/2025 07:24 am »
I'm predicting Flight 10 will be 105 days after the Ship 36 anomaly, so: 6/18/2025 + 105 = 10/1/2025 and thus I went with October.

My interquartile range is: 9/4/2025 to 10/28/2025
My 90% confidence interval is: 8/1/2025 to 12/5/2025

This is total garbage-in / garbage-out analysis based on a distribution with a mode of 104 days and a P90% of 156 days. That's less about what's possible and more about what I think would be acceptable to Musk.


(Dates in m/d/y format.)
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Offline redneck

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 528
  • swamp in Florida
  • Liked: 277
  • Likes Given: 214
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #5 on: 06/21/2025 10:02 am »
I went with October as I think there will be some rethinking done that will slow things down a bit. IMO SpaceX is paying a price for hubris in trying to do everything at huge scale at once. Not the individual work in the field, but in the initial decisions to go huge.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 41086
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 27090
  • Likes Given: 12768
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #6 on: 06/21/2025 03:44 pm »
I previously voted September. Shifted back one month to October due to the loss of S36 and the damage to the test stand.
I think it's entirely possible that there is a longer delay and a jump straight to V3.
Possible, but this failure had nothing to do with the V2 design issues. I think the COPV was for cold gas thrusters.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 41086
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 27090
  • Likes Given: 12768
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #7 on: 06/21/2025 03:45 pm »
I voted August.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline nicp

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 288
  • Retired software engineer.
  • UK
  • Liked: 167
  • Likes Given: 1811
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #8 on: 06/21/2025 03:54 pm »
Sticking with September - which clearly would have been wrong.
Could be longer if Masseys damage takes a while.
For Vectron!

Offline CraigLieb

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1236
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 1389
  • Likes Given: 2590
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #9 on: 06/21/2025 04:40 pm »
I was August in the old poll, being a bit of a pessimist. So, voting October now because of the theory that things take longer than expected.
Colonize Mars, and send Elon…

Offline Kaputnik

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3234
  • Liked: 864
  • Likes Given: 1080
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #10 on: 06/21/2025 05:00 pm »
I previously voted September. Shifted back one month to October due to the loss of S36 and the damage to the test stand.
I think it's entirely possible that there is a longer delay and a jump straight to V3.
Possible, but this failure had nothing to do with the V2 design issues. I think the COPV was for cold gas thrusters.

The extra time it will take to rebuild the test stand gives more time to get V3 ready, so I see a real possibility that they move on from the obsolete V2 vehicles.
"I don't care what anything was DESIGNED to do, I care about what it CAN do"- Gene Kranz

Offline baking

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 751
  • Boston
  • Liked: 647
  • Likes Given: 156
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #11 on: 06/22/2025 11:03 am »
I voted for 2026 under the assumption that Flight 10 will be from Pad B.

Offline DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9288
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 7470
  • Likes Given: 3213
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #12 on: 06/22/2025 06:12 pm »
I'm assuming IFT-10 will be a V3 launch, so I voted Nov/Dec. SpaceX may choose to go directly to V3, or not. Repairing Massey's for V2 testing might not make sense if they think V3 is nearly ready. V3 requires work at Massey's and the completion of Pad 2. Nov/Dec is actually too aggressive for this scenario, but as ever I'm an optimist.

Offline soyuzu

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 289
  • Liked: 434
  • Likes Given: 253
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #13 on: 06/24/2025 11:05 am »
I'm assuming IFT-10 will be a V3 launch, so I voted Nov/Dec. SpaceX may choose to go directly to V3, or not. Repairing Massey's for V2 testing might not make sense if they think V3 is nearly ready. V3 requires work at Massey's and the completion of Pad 2. Nov/Dec is actually too aggressive for this scenario, but as ever I'm an optimist.

Does V3 require so much rework on ground facilities? Isn’t current V3 just V2 with Raptor 3?

Offline DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9288
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 7470
  • Likes Given: 3213
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #14 on: 06/24/2025 01:46 pm »
I'm assuming IFT-10 will be a V3 launch, so I voted Nov/Dec. SpaceX may choose to go directly to V3, or not. Repairing Massey's for V2 testing might not make sense if they think V3 is nearly ready. V3 requires work at Massey's and the completion of Pad 2. Nov/Dec is actually too aggressive for this scenario, but as ever I'm an optimist.
Does V3 require so much rework on ground facilities? Isn’t current V3 just V2 with Raptor 3?
I don't know for Ship. Booster is much different. For Ship there are only two remaining V2 ships, and after those, Massey's will handle V3s. Therefore, it makes sense to focus on V3 Ships at Massey's. If the rebuilt GSE can also accomodate those two V2 Ships with little or no extra work, then sure, go ahead and do it. If accommodating V2 would delay or compromise V3 testing, then scrap the V2 Ships.

If V2 and V3 have very similar interfaces to the test stand at Massey's, then they probably have similar interfaces to Booster/HS and to Pad 1 SQD, and flying V3 Ship on a V2 Booster at Pad 1 would be feasible.

Offline sdsds

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8569
  • “With peace and hope for all mankind.”
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 3017
  • Likes Given: 2749
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #15 on: 08/15/2025 04:48 pm »
SpaceX is now seriously channeling, "Just a flesh wound." Or maybe, "Well, I heal fast. You see, I got good genes."
Murder, She Wrote (1984) - S01E03 Birds of a Feather
https://y.yarn.co/e45df7b6-f57e-42c9-91c0-5f19a4453916.mp4

I'll be happily outside my interquartile range if it launches before September 4.

https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1956387234665332804
— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 —

Online AmigaClone

Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #16 on: 08/15/2025 08:01 pm »
Who predicted SpaceX would improvise a testing stand on OLM-1?

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7139
  • Erie, CO
  • Liked: 4727
  • Likes Given: 2708
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #17 on: 08/15/2025 09:01 pm »
Yeah, if they pull off a flight before the end of August, just barely over two months after the Ship 36 kablooey, that'll be pretty darned impressive. And yeah, I doubt many people predicted they'd be able to improvise the testing on OLM-1. That's part of why I do these polls early on -- I think it's more interesting when you don't know how they're going to try to solve the problem.

Regardless, I voted September, and even if they only fly a few days earlier than that, I'll be quite happy to have been over-conservative. Especially if the flight is a good and successful one.

~Jon

Offline thespacecow

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1235
  • e/acc
  • Liked: 1185
  • Likes Given: 517
Re: #WenFlight10_PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #18 on: 08/17/2025 02:01 am »
Who predicted SpaceX would improvise a testing stand on OLM-1?

This is pretty easy to guess if you think from first principles.

Offline Kaputnik

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3234
  • Liked: 864
  • Likes Given: 1080
Re: #WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #19 on: 08/17/2025 10:56 am »
My 'October' is not looking like a particularly safe bet right now. Sometimes it's good to be wrong!
« Last Edit: 08/18/2025 08:33 pm by Chris Bergin »
"I don't care what anything was DESIGNED to do, I care about what it CAN do"- Gene Kranz

Offline Chris Bergin

Re: #WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #20 on: 08/18/2025 08:33 pm »
Odd (yes, ODD, Jon ;) ) thread title was breaking forum format, so put a space in it.
« Last Edit: 08/18/2025 08:34 pm by Chris Bergin »
Support NSF via L2 -- JOIN THE NSF TEAM -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7139
  • Erie, CO
  • Liked: 4727
  • Likes Given: 2708
Re: #WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #21 on: 08/18/2025 10:47 pm »
Sorry for being somewhat silly with the original title.

Online catdlr

  • She will always be part of me.
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27336
  • Enthusiast since the Redstone and Thunderbirds
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 22470
  • Likes Given: 13390
Re: #WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #22 on: 08/18/2025 11:01 pm »
Sorry for being somewhat silly with the original title.

It makes for a good password.
It's Tony De La Rosa... I don't create this stuff; I just report it.  I also cover launches and trim post (Tony TrimmerHand).

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7139
  • Erie, CO
  • Liked: 4727
  • Likes Given: 2708
Re: #WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #23 on: 08/19/2025 12:23 am »
I was mostly trying to channel silly Twitter hashtags, like #WenHop? and the like.

Online AmigaClone

Re: #WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #24 on: 08/19/2025 02:35 am »
Sorry for being somewhat silly with the original title.

We all can use a bit of silly in our lives.

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7139
  • Erie, CO
  • Liked: 4727
  • Likes Given: 2708
Re: #WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #25 on: 08/27/2025 12:06 am »
And it looks like the 9 of you who voted for August were the winners this time around! Just a flesh wound.

Though for those of you who voted September (like me), I wouldn't feel too bad. We were pretty close. Glad the weather finally cooperated, and I'm also glad the flight has so far gone so smoothly.

Congrats to those at SpaceX who burned the candle at both ends to make a turn around like this happen so fast!

I'll give it a day or two before the Flight 11 timing poll.

~Jon

Offline Metalskin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Brisbane, Australia
  • Liked: 253
  • Likes Given: 2306
Re: #WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #26 on: 08/27/2025 12:51 am »
I'm learning that I'm pessimistic. Though I'm happy that my guesses are always wrong. This time only by a week :D
How inappropriate to call this planet Earth when it is quite clearly Ocean. - Arthur C. Clarke

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7139
  • Erie, CO
  • Liked: 4727
  • Likes Given: 2708
Re: #WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #27 on: 08/27/2025 12:59 am »
I've been a little optimistic sometimes and a little pessimistic other times. But most of the guesses were within a few weeks, so I'd say that was pretty good, even if most of us were a tiny bit pessimistic.

~Jon

Offline redneck

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 528
  • swamp in Florida
  • Liked: 277
  • Likes Given: 214
Re: #WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #28 on: 08/27/2025 08:05 am »
Since I voted October, most of you can mock me to your hearts content. Congratulations to the Starship team.

No, I haven't changed my mind that it was a mistake going for the gigantic with multiple new technologies.

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7139
  • Erie, CO
  • Liked: 4727
  • Likes Given: 2708
Re: #WenFlight10 PostS36Kablooey
« Reply #29 on: 08/27/2025 09:01 pm »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1