... There is no chance of support for anything requiring intellectual discrimination and critical thinking, especially if it involves the word "nuclear".
John Kraus@johnkrausphotosA wide swath of former NASA astronauts have expressed their support for the nomination of Jared Isaacman as NASA Administrator:“We believe that Jared Isaacman is clearly qualified to lead NASA at this critical juncture. As an entrepreneur, pilot, and commander of two groundbreaking space missions, he brings credibility and capability to make a difference now. Most importantly, Jared has a genuine passion for space exploration and a genuine admiration for NASA as an American institution. He will bring renewed energy and sense of purpose to NASA.”Isaacman's hearing in front of the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation is set for Wednesday.
The budget and how to control it is offtopic. This ideological bickering is pointless. Can we get some moderation please?
We have threads here in Space Policy to discuss the FY 2026 NASA budget. I suggest using them.
We also have threads to discuss the nuts and bolts and policy of nuclear propulsion. I suggest using them.
My original post was in response to a poster's complaint that OMB was slashing NASA's budget, leaving Mr. Isaacman's hands tied as Administrator. My comment was intended to provide context only, as to why Mr. Isaacman is the right person to navigate this leaned down situation at the helm of NASA. Others took it from there, sliding severely off topic in places. I also ask the moderators to watch for context.
US President Donald Trump's nominee for NASA administrator, Jared Isaacman, is "committed to move the Space Shuttle Discovery to Houston," according to the office of Senator John Cornyn (R-TX).The statement came following a meeting between Isaacman and Cornyn, in which the pair discussed NASA's role in keeping the US ahead of China, returning humans to the Moon, and "continuing to bolster NASA's Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center (JSC) in Houston, Texas, as the human space flight center of excellence and innovation."
NASA nominee Jared Isaacman is due to undergo a confirmation hearing on Wednesday, and there is some hope he will be confirmed by the full Senate in mid-December.
Jared Isaacman, the Trump nominee for NASA Administrator, is set for nomination hearing No. 2 tomorrow. From his opening statement: “After more than a half-century, America is set to launch NASA astronauts around the Moon in just a matter of months--a challenging endeavor to say the least-- and one that requires fulltime leadership.” “This is not the time for delay, but for action, because if we fall behind--if we make a mistake--we may never catch up, and the consequences could shift the balance of power here on Earth.” “The Congress, and specifically this Committee, understand the urgency of the moment – placing a historic investment in human space exploration that President Trump signed in the one big beautiful bill. It’s now time for NASA and our partners to deliver.” “I am not here for personal gain, to favor or enrich contractors, to close centers, or to disrupt programs essential to completing America’s objectives in space. If confirmed, I am here to bring urgency and an extreme focus to the mission--to do all I can working with the best and brightest at NASA to lead humanity’s effort to unlock the secrets of the universe and ensure American leadership across the last great frontier.”
NSF - NASASpaceflight.com@NASASpaceflightA late-night NASA release titled "Support Grows for President Trump’s Nominee to Lead NASA" with a host of supportive quotes:
Ryan Caton@dpoddolphinproAnd the hearing has concluded. Senators have until business close tomorrow, Dec 4th, to submit written questions for Jared Isaacman. This is an expedited approach compared to the first time around.We should expect a vote of the committee next week.📷 US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
For those of us that didn't watch – did anything worth noting happen? Thanks!
