Author Topic: MMX : JAXA : Phobos Sample Return  (Read 80217 times)

Offline redliox

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2662
  • Illinois USA
  • Liked: 719
  • Likes Given: 109
Re: JAXA's Mars moon Sample Return Mission, MMX
« Reply #40 on: 11/14/2021 08:43 am »
Is there a benefit to using a quasi orbit versus a syndonic orbit? If what I read on quasi is right, it's basically traveling the same period as your target but zooming by thanks to high eccentricity. Is the high eccentricity to minimize maneuvering post-capture?

Dawn and most of the (orbital) asteroid missions seem to go slow and incrementally cuddle up to their targets. MMX seems less patient, but the goal is to return to Earth instead of loitering for science. Any reason for some of these differences?
"Let the trails lead where they may, I will follow."
-Tigatron


Offline jackvancouver

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 230
  • Video Tech expert
  • Vancouver, Canada
    • Vimeo channel
  • Liked: 154
  • Likes Given: 57
Re: JAXA's Mars moon Sample Return Mission, MMX
« Reply #42 on: 07/23/2022 10:41 am »
https://global.jaxa.jp/press/2020/09/20200910-2_e.html

8K Camera on the Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) Spacecraft to Take Ultra High Definition Images of Mars

I honestly think this is the coolest part of the mission. I've always seen it as public outreach that full motion video (remember each time NHK and JAXA team up, the cameras run at full frame rate. 1080i for the Lunar probe, 4K 29.97p for the Sony A7SII mounted to the station, and I really hope this is 8K 60fps on MMX) gives a more impactful impression on people vs low frame rate or stills in the right orbit.

Also, they planned long term for dead pixel replacement algorithms if you look back at the lunar mission briefs.

Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2843
  • Liked: 826
  • Likes Given: 1385
JAXA MMX Phobos sample return
« Reply #43 on: 06/14/2023 12:00 am »
Although there have been mentions, there does not seem to be a dedicated thread for this mission, due to launch next year.  Here are some links to kick things off.

https://www.mmx.jaxa.jp/en/

https://www.isas.jaxa.jp/en/missions/spacecraft/developing/mmx.html

[zubenelgenubi: There is already a thread.  Threads merged.  Thank you for the updates.]
« Last Edit: 06/14/2023 12:15 am by zubenelgenubi »
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2843
  • Liked: 826
  • Likes Given: 1385
Re: JAXA MMX Phobos sample return
« Reply #44 on: 06/14/2023 12:01 am »
Australia-Japan leaders support in principle the landing of the MMX (Martian Moons eXploration) capsule in Australia.

https://www.isas.jaxa.jp/en/topics/003227.html
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2843
  • Liked: 826
  • Likes Given: 1385
Re: JAXA MMX Phobos sample return
« Reply #45 on: 06/14/2023 12:01 am »
JAXA and NASA sign the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for cooperation on the MMX mission

https://www.isas.jaxa.jp/en/topics/003375.html
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Online Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17969
  • Liked: 10809
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: MMX : JAXA : Phobos Sample Return
« Reply #46 on: 06/20/2023 03:37 pm »

Online Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17969
  • Liked: 10809
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: MMX : JAXA : Phobos Sample Return
« Reply #47 on: 07/12/2023 02:05 pm »
New MMX briefing.


Offline redliox

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2662
  • Illinois USA
  • Liked: 719
  • Likes Given: 109
"Let the trails lead where they may, I will follow."
-Tigatron

Online Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17969
  • Liked: 10809
  • Likes Given: 2

Offline tul

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 166
  • Liked: 47
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: MMX : JAXA : Phobos Sample Return
« Reply #51 on: 12/30/2023 03:20 am »
Because of the difficulties with the H3 Japan delayed the launch of the MMX mission to 2026. New return date is 2031.
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20231206/k10014279131000.html

https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/science-nature/science/20231206-154061/
« Last Edit: 12/30/2023 03:24 am by tul »

Offline JulesVerneATV

  • Regular
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 994
  • Liked: 125
  • Likes Given: 20
Re: MMX : JAXA : Phobos Sample Return
« Reply #52 on: 01/14/2024 12:42 pm »
The Japanese space agency JAXA confirmed the two-year delay in the launch of the Martian Moons eXploration, or MMX, mission, blaming it in part on the H3 rocket that will launch the spacecraft.
https://spacenews.com/japanese-mars-mission-launch-delayed-to-2026/
“Owing to evaluate the demonstration results of the second H3 rocket test vehicle and considering the importance to ensure sufficient time for preliminary verification of MMX on the ground, the launch schedule for Japanese rockets has been reviewed,” the agency said in a Jan. 10 statement to SpaceNews.
The H3 made its inaugural launch in March 2023 but failed to reach orbit when its second stage engine did not ignite, likely because of an electrical issue. JAXA announced Dec. 27 it had scheduled the second H3 launch for as soon as Feb. 14, carrying a test payload and two smallsats.
MMX was scheduled to launch in September 2024. It would have entered orbit around Mars in August 2025 and remained there for three years before heading back to Earth, returning in September 2029.

Offline redliox

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2662
  • Illinois USA
  • Liked: 719
  • Likes Given: 109
Re: MMX : JAXA : Phobos Sample Return
« Reply #53 on: 01/14/2024 05:14 pm »
Major pity on the delay, but glad it's not a cancelation.  JAXA will still end up with the honor of bringing the first samples from the vicinity of Mars back to Earth.
"Let the trails lead where they may, I will follow."
-Tigatron

Offline Zed_Noir

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5490
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1815
  • Likes Given: 1302
Re: MMX : JAXA : Phobos Sample Return
« Reply #54 on: 01/14/2024 09:15 pm »
Major pity on the delay, but glad it's not a cancelation.  JAXA will still end up with the honor of bringing the first samples from the vicinity of Mars back to Earth.
Wonder if using another launcher is an option for JAXA to avoid the 2 year delay?

Online Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17969
  • Liked: 10809
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: MMX : JAXA : Phobos Sample Return
« Reply #55 on: 01/15/2024 02:57 pm »
Major pity on the delay, but glad it's not a cancelation.  JAXA will still end up with the honor of bringing the first samples from the vicinity of Mars back to Earth.
Wonder if using another launcher is an option for JAXA to avoid the 2 year delay?

What other launcher does Japan have that has this capability?

Online DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9447
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 7551
  • Likes Given: 3271
Re: MMX : JAXA : Phobos Sample Return
« Reply #56 on: 01/15/2024 03:54 pm »
Major pity on the delay, but glad it's not a cancelation.  JAXA will still end up with the honor of bringing the first samples from the vicinity of Mars back to Earth.
Wonder if using another launcher is an option for JAXA to avoid the 2 year delay?
What other launcher does Japan have that has this capability?
I think "another launcher" is a polite euphemism for "Falcon 9".

Online Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17969
  • Liked: 10809
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: MMX : JAXA : Phobos Sample Return
« Reply #57 on: 01/15/2024 07:43 pm »
Major pity on the delay, but glad it's not a cancelation.  JAXA will still end up with the honor of bringing the first samples from the vicinity of Mars back to Earth.
Wonder if using another launcher is an option for JAXA to avoid the 2 year delay?
What other launcher does Japan have that has this capability?
I think "another launcher" is a polite euphemism for "Falcon 9".

Not Japanese.

The idea that SpaceX solves all problems is simplistic and naive.

Online DanClemmensen

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9447
  • Earth (currently)
  • Liked: 7551
  • Likes Given: 3271
Re: MMX : JAXA : Phobos Sample Return
« Reply #58 on: 01/15/2024 08:06 pm »
Major pity on the delay, but glad it's not a cancelation.  JAXA will still end up with the honor of bringing the first samples from the vicinity of Mars back to Earth.
Wonder if using another launcher is an option for JAXA to avoid the 2 year delay?
What other launcher does Japan have that has this capability?
I think "another launcher" is a polite euphemism for "Falcon 9".

Not Japanese.

The idea that SpaceX solves all problems is simplistic and naive.
No, but it might solve this particular problem.

Falcon 9 has become the default alternate launcher when the primary launcher in not available for whatever reason, even when there are political or business reasons to want to avoid it. Examples are OneWeb (a competitor), Kuiper (wrong multibillionaire) and Copernicus (not European). "Not Japanese" may give way to the desire to actually launch.

Online TheKutKu

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1446
  • France
  • Liked: 1513
  • Likes Given: 1145
Re: MMX : JAXA : Phobos Sample Return
« Reply #59 on: 01/15/2024 10:57 pm »
Major pity on the delay, but glad it's not a cancelation.  JAXA will still end up with the honor of bringing the first samples from the vicinity of Mars back to Earth.
Wonder if using another launcher is an option for JAXA to avoid the 2 year delay?


MMX's mass was reported as 4,000 kg in 2020 https://www.mext.go.jp/kaigisiryo/content/000034537.pdf and inserted in a direct Mars transfer orbit; which is awfuly close to Falcon 9's advertised payload to mars of 4,020 kg (which also isn't a static thing, but slightly varies for each synods);

4 years later I have no doubt that the inevitable minor mass creep makes it impossible for JAXA to launch it on a Falcon 9, so the alternative is a Falcon Heavy which is possibly unavailable to order and launch on such a relatively short notice and, anyway, more expensive than a H3 and maybe unafordable for JAXA's planned budget (minimum of $97 Million vs $50-90M variously reported for H3).

ULA is booked, Ariane 64 will not be ready for the launch, HIIA is both booked, phasing out and not powerful enough, LVM3 is not capable, there are no alternatives.
« Last Edit: 01/15/2024 11:03 pm by TheKutKu »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0