Author Topic: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)  (Read 26016 times)

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269
Re: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)
« Reply #80 on: 11/14/2024 12:19 am »
At 9m23s of this video, the new Senate leader Thune said that the Senate will continue with the Filibuster rule which means that Appropriations bills will still need 60 Senators (and thus bipartisan support) to pass.

« Last Edit: 11/14/2024 12:34 am by yg1968 »

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269
Re: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)
« Reply #81 on: 11/14/2024 02:57 pm »

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269
Re: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)
« Reply #85 on: 12/17/2024 02:33 pm »
Speaker Johnson said a few minutes ago that the text of the CR will be released today and that it will last until March 14th.
« Last Edit: 12/17/2024 02:45 pm by yg1968 »

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269
Re: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)
« Reply #87 on: 12/19/2024 12:54 am »
House GOP leaders scramble for Plan B after Trump, Musk lead conservative fury against spending bill:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-gop-leaders-scramble-plan-b-after-trump-musk-lead-conservative-fury-against-spending-bill

Quote from: the article
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., confirmed to reporters that the deal was dead while leaving the Capitol on Wednesday night. [...] Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., told reporters while leaving Johnson's office in the early evening, "There will be a new CR likely tomorrow. They are negotiating right now. But there will be no votes this evening."

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269
Re: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)
« Reply #89 on: 12/19/2024 08:32 pm »
Republicans announce funding agreement, Thursday vote as shutdown looms:
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5049416-republicans-government-funding-agreement-thursday-vote-shutdown/

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269

Online Targeteer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7078
  • near hangar 18
  • Liked: 4540
  • Likes Given: 1507
Re: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)
« Reply #91 on: 12/20/2024 10:38 pm »
Space mentions in the CR passed by the House.  https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20241216/ARA%2012.20.pdf

‘S EC . 153. Amounts made available by section 10124
for ‘Department of Commerce—National Oceanic and At-25
mospheric Administration—Procurement, Acquisition and
Construction’ may be apportioned up to the rate for oper-1
ations necessary to maintain the acquisition schedule for2
Geostationary Earth Orbit in an amount not to exceed3
$625,000,000.


NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION17
CONSTRUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND18
RESTORATION19
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)20
For an additional amount for ‘‘Construction and En-21
vironmental Compliance and Restoration’’ for repair and22
replacement of National Aeronautics and Space Adminis-23
tration facilities damaged by hurricanes, tropical storms,24
typhoons, and tornadoes in calendar years 2023 and 2024200,000, to remain available until expended: Pro-1
vided, That up to 20 percent of such amount may be2
transferred to ‘‘Space Operations’’ for necessary expenses3
related to communications facilities and equipment, re-4
quired remediation, and alternative operations caused by5
Typhoon Mawar: Provided further, That except as pro-6
vided in the preceding proviso, the amounts appropriated7
under this heading in this Act shall not be available for8
transfer under any transfer authority provided for the Na-9
tional Aeronautics and Space Administration in an appro-10
priation Act for fiscal year 2025: Provided further, That11
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration shall12
submit a spending plan to the Committees on Appropria-13
tions of the House of Representatives and the Senate not14
later than 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act:15
Provided further, That such amount is designated by the16
Congress as being for an emergency requirement pursuant17
to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and18
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

PROCUREMENT , S PACE FORCE15
For an additional amount for ‘‘Procurement, Space16
Force’’, $37,994,000, to remain available until September17
30, 2027, for necessary expenses related to the con-18
sequences of Typhoon Mawar: Provided, That such19
amount is designated by the Congress as being for an20
emergency requirement pursuant to section21
251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency22
Deficit Control Act of 1985.
Best quote heard during an inspection, "I was unaware that I was the only one who was aware."

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269
Re: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)
« Reply #92 on: 12/21/2024 01:09 am »
House passes bill to avert government shutdown after whirlwind funding fight:
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5051634-government-funding-shutdown-house-bill/

The CR passed by the House is until March 14th.

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269

Offline Tywin

Re: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)
« Reply #95 on: 01/22/2025 01:24 am »
Can we expect a big upgrade of the 2025 budget for NASA?
The knowledge is power...Everything is connected...
The Turtle continues at a steady pace ...

Offline deltaV

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2834
  • Change in velocity
  • Liked: 1148
  • Likes Given: 4377
Re: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)
« Reply #96 on: 01/22/2025 03:53 am »
Can we expect a big upgrade of the 2025 budget for NASA?

I doubt it. I'd guess Trump's budget proposal will get the money for the new people to Mars program from other parts of NASA's budget, e.g. the money freed by canceling SLS/Orion/Gateway, the planetary science money freed up by canceling Mars sample return and a reduction in earth science funding. I don't yet have a guess about what the budget that Congress will eventually pass will do.
« Last Edit: 01/22/2025 04:30 am by deltaV »

Offline OM72

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 128
  • Houston, TX
  • Liked: 127
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)
« Reply #97 on: 01/22/2025 05:40 pm »
Can we expect a big upgrade of the 2025 budget for NASA?

I doubt it. I'd guess Trump's budget proposal will get the money for the new people to Mars program from other parts of NASA's budget, e.g. the money freed by canceling SLS/Orion/Gateway, the planetary science money freed up by canceling Mars sample return and a reduction in earth science funding. I don't yet have a guess about what the budget that Congress will eventually pass will do.

People don't seem to get the point that we, as a people, are NOT ready to go to Mars.  I wish I could say otherwise.  By that, sure in a four or five years we could *probably* land there but that would be about it.  We really have no idea how to live there nor will have the equipment to do anything meaningful. 

I think there are too many here who, to some extent, are greatly misinformed.  Because Musk says something on Twitter, that it magically means SLS/Orion/Gateway will be cancelled and somehow all the work we've done on returning to the moon can magically be re-purposed toward Mars. 

It doesn't work that way.  Do I believe SLS will be cancelled?  Probably.  But it will also be a transition, or it should be.  We have the Artemis II core nearly complete, if not already.  Artemis III is somewhere in the pipeline.  Probably shouldn't just throw them away and give other *possibilities* time to take its place while still providing the cadence to return to the moon. 

People, including Musk, are also ignoring certain geo-political considerations.  China says it is going to the moon by 2030.  Also to the south pole.  I think it is important to consider if we are not there, that China claims the entire moon for themselves. 

It's going to get bumpy in the next few months.  Strap in. 

Online yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18179
  • Liked: 7799
  • Likes Given: 3269
Re: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)
« Reply #98 on: 01/22/2025 07:05 pm »
Can we expect a big upgrade of the 2025 budget for NASA?

I doubt it. I'd guess Trump's budget proposal will get the money for the new people to Mars program from other parts of NASA's budget, e.g. the money freed by canceling SLS/Orion/Gateway, the planetary science money freed up by canceling Mars sample return and a reduction in earth science funding. I don't yet have a guess about what the budget that Congress will eventually pass will do.

People don't seem to get the point that we, as a people, are NOT ready to go to Mars.  I wish I could say otherwise.  By that, sure in a four or five years we could *probably* land there but that would be about it.  We really have no idea how to live there nor will have the equipment to do anything meaningful. 

I think there are too many here who, to some extent, are greatly misinformed.  Because Musk says something on Twitter, that it magically means SLS/Orion/Gateway will be cancelled and somehow all the work we've done on returning to the moon can magically be re-purposed toward Mars. 

It doesn't work that way.  Do I believe SLS will be cancelled?  Probably.  But it will also be a transition, or it should be.  We have the Artemis II core nearly complete, if not already.  Artemis III is somewhere in the pipeline.  Probably shouldn't just throw them away and give other *possibilities* time to take its place while still providing the cadence to return to the moon. 

People, including Musk, are also ignoring certain geo-political considerations.  China says it is going to the moon by 2030.  Also to the south pole.  I think it is important to consider if we are not there, that China claims the entire moon for themselves. 

It's going to get bumpy in the next few months.  Strap in.

I think that most people on this Forum aren't assuming that all lunar activities will be cancelled. Most people think that changes to Artemis are coming and that some kind of commercial crew and cargo program to Mars will be initiated. Implementing these two things would be a huge accomplishment in and of itself. For human space exploration positive changes are coming.

Offline OM72

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 128
  • Houston, TX
  • Liked: 127
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: FY 2025 NASA Budget (March 11th)
« Reply #99 on: 01/22/2025 08:56 pm »

People don't seem to get the point that we, as a people, are NOT ready to go to Mars.  I wish I could say otherwise.  By that, sure in a four or five years we could *probably* land there but that would be about it.  We really have no idea how to live there nor will have the equipment to do anything meaningful. 

I think there are too many here who, to some extent, are greatly misinformed.  Because Musk says something on Twitter, that it magically means SLS/Orion/Gateway will be cancelled and somehow all the work we've done on returning to the moon can magically be re-purposed toward Mars. 

It doesn't work that way.  Do I believe SLS will be cancelled?  Probably.  But it will also be a transition, or it should be.  We have the Artemis II core nearly complete, if not already.  Artemis III is somewhere in the pipeline.  Probably shouldn't just throw them away and give other *possibilities* time to take its place while still providing the cadence to return to the moon. 

People, including Musk, are also ignoring certain geo-political considerations.  China says it is going to the moon by 2030.  Also to the south pole.  I think it is important to consider if we are not there, that China claims the entire moon for themselves. 

It's going to get bumpy in the next few months.  Strap in.

I think that most people on this Forum aren't assuming that all lunar activities will be cancelled. Most people think that changes to Artemis are coming and that some kind of commercial crew and cargo program to Mars will be initiated. Implementing these two things would be a huge accomplishment in and of itself. For human space exploration positive changes are coming.

As I mentioned, I also believe changes are coming.  That being said, some seem to suggest (whether they realize it or not) "throwing the baby out with the bath water".  Saying notionally a "most aren't assuming all lunar activities will be cancelled", "commercial crew and cargo program to Mars", "implementing these two things would be a huge accomplishment" is completely subjective. 

It also should be recognized the entire office that controls all of this is literally called "Moon to Mars Program Office". 

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0