Author Topic: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3  (Read 1452317 times)

Offline Space Ghost 1962

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2780
  • Whatcha gonna do when the Ghost zaps you?
  • Liked: 2926
  • Likes Given: 2247
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1840 on: 04/16/2016 11:24 pm »
Put up a TV antenna tower, with options ;)
We can establish the North American NSF Broadcast and L2 Command Centre with annexes at launch sites where we can get access. NSF International HQ is in the UK of course. Then we can get NEC guys merged in for Japan launch coverage and we'll be golden. I don't know who else we have here that can cover the other world launch sites.

International Launch News Network ;)

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9358
  • Liked: 5368
  • Likes Given: 776
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1841 on: 04/16/2016 11:57 pm »
Put up a TV antenna tower, with options ;)
We can establish the North American NSF Broadcast and L2 Command Centre with annexes at launch sites where we can get access. NSF International HQ is in the UK of course. Then we can get NEC guys merged in for Japan launch coverage and we'll be golden. I don't know who else we have here that can cover the other world launch sites.

International Launch News Network ;)
yeah my grand mad scientist master plan is to then combine all other world space media and forum into one corporation.

So now we need mod and Chris and Mark approval to proceed to turn us into an untouchable mainstream media corporation.
« Last Edit: 04/16/2016 11:59 pm by russianhalo117 »

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9358
  • Liked: 5368
  • Likes Given: 776
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1842 on: 04/17/2016 12:02 am »
Urk, I started a monster.
umm... last time I checked you were a Mod and are not supposed to create. Instead you are supposed to prevent and enforce. yet since a mod did started it, it must be allowed just like cheating glitches in games that were never fixed.

Offline The Amazing Catstronaut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1065
  • Arsia Mons, Mars, Sol IV, Inner Solar Solar System, Sol system.
  • Liked: 759
  • Likes Given: 626
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1843 on: 04/17/2016 12:29 am »
I think we should crowdfund a few webcam satellites. Only way to nip this issue in the bud.
Resident feline spaceflight expert. Knows nothing of value about human spaceflight.

Offline Nomadd

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9092
  • Virginia
  • Liked: 61576
  • Likes Given: 1409
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1844 on: 04/17/2016 12:53 am »
 Is it OK if I keep working on my shed while we're planning the first interplanetary media conglomerate? 
 bocachicagal can post updates if she wants.
« Last Edit: 04/17/2016 12:54 am by Nomadd »
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.

Offline Johnnyhinbos

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3874
  • Boston, MA
  • Liked: 8115
  • Likes Given: 959
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1845 on: 04/17/2016 02:51 am »

Is it OK if I keep working on my shed while we're planning the first interplanetary media conglomerate? 
 bocachicagal can post updates if she wants.
That's ok, but you gotta let BioBritt in on the action too, 'cause she's a fellow aquarist...
John Hanzl. Author, action / adventure www.johnhanzl.com

Offline Kabloona

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
  • Velocitas Eradico
  • Fortress of Solitude
  • Liked: 3472
  • Likes Given: 743
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1846 on: 04/17/2016 03:02 am »
Is it OK if I keep working on my shed while we're planning the first interplanetary media conglomerate? 

Yes, because your shed will be Boca Chica satellite office.  ;)
« Last Edit: 04/17/2016 03:03 am by Kabloona »

Offline CraigLieb

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1236
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 1389
  • Likes Given: 2599
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1847 on: 04/17/2016 04:50 am »
Put up a TV antenna tower, with options ;)
We can establish the North American NSF Broadcast and L2 Command Centre with annexes at launch sites where we can get access. NSF International HQ is in the UK of course. Then we can get NEC guys merged in for Japan launch coverage and we'll be golden. I don't know who else we have here that can cover the other world launch sites.

International Launch News Network ;)

I can see it now
Exciting shows like
 - Dirt pile truckers
 - Crane cam specials
 - Our favorite game show " Don't rock the ASDS"
 - cooking with RP1
 - 24 hour repeat music videos of "Launch Land and Relaunch"
 - etc.
Colonize Mars, and send Elon…

Offline enzo

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 137
  • USA
  • Liked: 118
  • Likes Given: 886
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1848 on: 04/17/2016 07:07 am »
In all seriousness, I'm sure if the locals hosted a virtual tailgate type show for launches, it would be a big hit. No pretension, just a view of the action on top and some sizzling BBQ on the bottom.

Offline Lar

  • Fan boy at large
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13506
  • Saw Gemini live on TV
  • A large LEGO storage facility ... in Michigan
  • Liked: 11907
  • Likes Given: 11218
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1849 on: 04/17/2016 03:10 pm »
Urk, I started a monster.
umm... last time I checked you were a Mod and are not supposed to create. Instead you are supposed to prevent and enforce. yet since a mod did started it, it must be allowed just like cheating glitches in games that were never fixed.

That's a NOPE.   
"I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact." -Elon Musk
"We're a little bit like the dog who caught the bus" - Musk after CRS-8 S1 successfully landed on ASDS OCISLY

Offline bocachicagal

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4240
  • boca chica
  • Liked: 94452
  • Likes Given: 288
My name is NOT Maria. My name IS Mary.

Offline Dave G

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3360
  • Liked: 2196
  • Likes Given: 2101
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1851 on: 04/17/2016 08:22 pm »
« Last Edit: 04/17/2016 08:27 pm by Dave G »

Offline gospacex

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3024
  • Liked: 543
  • Likes Given: 604
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1852 on: 04/17/2016 09:00 pm »
At least the launch site shouldn't have to deal with as much settling as Kansai Airport in Osaka

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansai_International_Airport:
Quote
The sink rate fell from 50 cm (20 in) per year during 1994 to 7 cm (2.8 in) per year in 2008.

I saw something years ago where they have crews which use hydraulic jacks to lift support beams and insert spacers at the bottom to keep the above structure level while the ground is settling underneath.  Probably not a practical solution with a slap of concrete on top.

It may be practical, if the "slab of concrete" is designed for it. If it is foreseen that uneven settling can be a problem, the foundation may be designed so that it can be leveled by injecting concrete or epoxy resins under high pressure under the sections which are settling more. Foundation needs to be designed to be resistant to loads occurring during such operations.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 41109
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 27136
  • Likes Given: 12780
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1853 on: 04/17/2016 11:45 pm »
Or sand-jacking works, too.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6820
  • Liked: 4990
  • Likes Given: 6571
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1854 on: 04/18/2016 04:04 am »
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline Jdeshetler

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 829
  • Silicon Valley, CA
  • Liked: 3793
  • Likes Given: 3933
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1855 on: 04/18/2016 06:35 am »
The earth mount seems to be shift southwest by 65' when compare with the original plan (in light greens).

Is it to make the ramp from HWY 4 to the top of earth mount less steep? 

And according to the red circle in insert photo, the driveway between the Hanger and Pad seems to be shifted 120' southwest, too?

Offline bocachicagal

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4240
  • boca chica
  • Liked: 94452
  • Likes Given: 288
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1856 on: 04/18/2016 12:50 pm »
The earth mount seems to be shift southwest by 65' when compare with the original plan (in light greens).

Is it to make the ramp from HWY 4 to the top of earth mount less steep? 

And according to the red circle in insert photo, the driveway between the Hanger and Pad seems to be shifted 120' southwest, too?

I think what is showing in the red circled area is the pile of organics that was removed from the construction site.
My name is NOT Maria. My name IS Mary.

Offline Nomadd

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9092
  • Virginia
  • Liked: 61576
  • Likes Given: 1409
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1857 on: 04/18/2016 03:36 pm »
The earth mount seems to be shift southwest by 65' when compare with the original plan (in light greens).

Is it to make the ramp from HWY 4 to the top of earth mount less steep? 

And according to the red circle in insert photo, the driveway between the Hanger and Pad seems to be shifted 120' southwest, too?

I think what is showing in the red circled area is the pile of organics that was removed from the construction site.
It is. That's the first thing that appeared when they started working.
 That ramp you see looks way too steep for an assembled rocket. It goes straight to the top from the road, not to mention making the turn. I've been wondering if they might be putting in a causeway from the west.
 Everything probably shifted away from the road when they realized how much they'd have to raise the site.
« Last Edit: 04/19/2016 07:17 pm by Nomadd »
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.

Offline Nomadd

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9092
  • Virginia
  • Liked: 61576
  • Likes Given: 1409
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1858 on: 04/19/2016 07:18 pm »
 I might be wrong about the ramp. There's a survey team out working on the ramp and across the road. They could be planning to regrade it and make a wide access turn on the north side of the highway.
 The site looks a little over 2 D6's high now, so I think they're finished with that stage. It'll give the highway crew a chance to flatten the road back out.
 The problem with the highway is obvious once you look at it. They widened the skinny two lane road when they resurfaced it last year by paving over the shoulders, but didn't do anything to the base. The collapsing spots are almost all in the three foot wide strips to the outside where the old shoulders were.
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.

Offline mlindner

  • Software Engineer
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3135
  • Space Capitalist
  • Silicon Valley, CA
  • Liked: 2628
  • Likes Given: 996
Re: SpaceX Texas launch site Discussion and Updates - Thread 3
« Reply #1859 on: 04/20/2016 08:28 am »
Nomadd what's the actual prospects of us setting up a webcam on a pole in your front yard?
LEO is the ocean, not an island (let alone a continent). We create cruise liners to ride the oceans, not artificial islands in the middle of them. We need a physical place, which has physical resources, to make our future out there.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0