Quote from: docmordrid on 04/16/2016 10:46 pmPut up a TV antenna tower, with options We can establish the North American NSF Broadcast and L2 Command Centre with annexes at launch sites where we can get access. NSF International HQ is in the UK of course. Then we can get NEC guys merged in for Japan launch coverage and we'll be golden. I don't know who else we have here that can cover the other world launch sites.
Put up a TV antenna tower, with options
Quote from: russianhalo117 on 04/16/2016 10:56 pmQuote from: docmordrid on 04/16/2016 10:46 pmPut up a TV antenna tower, with options We can establish the North American NSF Broadcast and L2 Command Centre with annexes at launch sites where we can get access. NSF International HQ is in the UK of course. Then we can get NEC guys merged in for Japan launch coverage and we'll be golden. I don't know who else we have here that can cover the other world launch sites.International Launch News Network
Urk, I started a monster.
Is it OK if I keep working on my shed while we're planning the first interplanetary media conglomerate? bocachicagal can post updates if she wants.
Is it OK if I keep working on my shed while we're planning the first interplanetary media conglomerate?
Quote from: Lar on 04/16/2016 06:47 pmUrk, I started a monster.umm... last time I checked you were a Mod and are not supposed to create. Instead you are supposed to prevent and enforce. yet since a mod did started it, it must be allowed just like cheating glitches in games that were never fixed.
At least the launch site shouldn't have to deal with as much settling as Kansai Airport in OsakaFrom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansai_International_Airport:QuoteThe sink rate fell from 50 cm (20 in) per year during 1994 to 7 cm (2.8 in) per year in 2008.I saw something years ago where they have crews which use hydraulic jacks to lift support beams and insert spacers at the bottom to keep the above structure level while the ground is settling underneath. Probably not a practical solution with a slap of concrete on top.
The sink rate fell from 50 cm (20 in) per year during 1994 to 7 cm (2.8 in) per year in 2008.
The earth mount seems to be shift southwest by 65' when compare with the original plan (in light greens). Is it to make the ramp from HWY 4 to the top of earth mount less steep? And according to the red circle in insert photo, the driveway between the Hanger and Pad seems to be shifted 120' southwest, too?
Quote from: Jdeshetler on 04/18/2016 06:35 amThe earth mount seems to be shift southwest by 65' when compare with the original plan (in light greens). Is it to make the ramp from HWY 4 to the top of earth mount less steep? And according to the red circle in insert photo, the driveway between the Hanger and Pad seems to be shifted 120' southwest, too?I think what is showing in the red circled area is the pile of organics that was removed from the construction site.