Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Starlink Group 4-6 : KSC LC-39A : 18/19 January 2022  (Read 41094 times)

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9485
  • US
  • Liked: 12221
  • Likes Given: 5393
Thread for the Starlink 4-6 launch from Florida.

NSF Threads for Starlink 4-6: Discussion

Successful launch January 18, 2022 at 9:02pm EST (02:02 UTC on the 19th) from from LC-39A on booster 1060-10.  ASDS landing on ASOG was successful..

Payload 49 Starlink satellites to 53.2 degree inclination on SE trajectory.  Initial orbit of ~210x339km.  On the Starlink Group 4-5 webcast it was mentioned that the southeast trajectory is to increase the recovery weather availability for the booster and fairings during the winter months.

Quote
SpaceX is targeting Monday, January 17 for a Falcon 9 launch of 49 Starlink satellites to low Earth orbit from Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) at Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The instantaneous launch window is at 7:26 p.m. EST (00:36 UTC on January 18), and a backup opportunity is available on Tuesday, January 18 at 7:04 p.m. EST (00:04 UTC on January 19).

The booster supporting this mission previously launched GPS III-3, Turksat 5A, Transporter-2, and six Starlink missions. Following stage separation, SpaceX will land Falcon 9’s first stage on the A Shortfall of Gravitas droneship, which will be stationed in the Atlantic Ocean. Each of Falcon 9’s fairing halves previously supported one Starlink mission.

Please use the Starlink Discussion Thread for all general discussion on Starlink.

Check the Starlink Index Thread for links to more Starlink information.

L2 SpaceX:
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?board=60.0

From a previous mission's Press Kit:
Quote
Each Starlink satellite weights approximately 260 kg and features a compact, flat-panel design that minimizes volume, allowing for a dense launch stack to take full advantage of Falcon 9’s launch capabilities. With four powerful phased array and two parabolic antennas on each satellite ... At end of their life cycle, the satellites will utilize their on-board propulsion system to deorbit over the course of a few months. In the unlikely event their propulsion system becomes inoperable, the satellites will burn up in Earth’s atmosphere within 1-5 years, significantly less than the hundreds or thousands of years required at higher altitudes. Further, Starlink components are designed for full demisability.

Starlink is targeting service to near global coverage of the populated world by 2021. Additional information on the system can be found at starlink.com.
« Last Edit: 01/19/2022 01:10 pm by gongora »

Offline crandles57

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 472
  • Sychdyn
  • Liked: 325
  • Likes Given: 104
2 more Starlink launches from 39A. So presumably approx 18/19th and 30/31 Jan?

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Liked: 2719
  • Likes Given: 2010
2 more Starlink launches from 39A. So presumably approx 18/19th and 30/31 Jan?
Looking at the LC-40 manifest, I would say that the remaining two Starlink missions will be from LC-39A.
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.twitter.com/conexionspacial | www.conexionespacial.com

Offline spacevalley27

  • Member
  • Posts: 35
  • Liked: 131
  • Likes Given: 1
I hate not finding the right place to ask a question but I'll try here: will the Starlink 4-2 mission ever be done? Pure curiosity about the numeration

For the mods: feel free to move in case there is a more suitable thread.

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1929
  • Liked: 2719
  • Likes Given: 2010
I hate not finding the right place to ask a question but I'll try here: will the Starlink 4-2 mission ever be done? Pure curiosity about the numeration

For the mods: feel free to move in case there is a more suitable thread.
Starlink 4-2 and Starlink 2-2 have been delayed for quite some time, but I guess if they will be launched, it will depend on the allocations we see in the FCC licenses.
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.twitter.com/conexionspacial | www.conexionespacial.com

Offline RocketLover0119

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2887
  • Space Geek
  • Tampa, Florida
  • Liked: 6767
  • Likes Given: 1607
Core plus stage 2 on the roll today. 2 weeks exactly until CSG-2 which seems like too little time, so this could be the next Starlink mission or the one after. https://twitter.com/nasa8500/status/1480601163393286152?s=21
"The Starship has landed"

Offline lenny97

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 118
  • Pescara, Abruzzo - Italy
  • Liked: 221
  • Likes Given: 231
Core plus stage 2 on the roll today. 2 weeks exactly until CSG-2 which seems like too little time, so this could be the next Starlink mission or the one after. https://twitter.com/nasa8500/status/1480601163393286152?s=21

Isn't also true that the road in front of the VAB goes to 39A?
CSG-2 is scheduled on SLC-40...
Founder of www.spacevoyaging.com — Independent Space News Blog
I'm based in Pescara, Italy. Music addicted.

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9029
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 5537
  • Likes Given: 50687
Core plus stage 2 on the roll today. 2 weeks exactly until CSG-2 which seems like too little time, so this could be the next Starlink mission or the one after.
Quote from: tweet
Walking out of one of the offices and look what I bumped into … Just another Monday at work!
Filthy first stage!

Can anyone identify it by markings or "soot-ology"?
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.)
My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!"

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9485
  • US
  • Liked: 12221
  • Likes Given: 5393
Core plus stage 2 on the roll today. 2 weeks exactly until CSG-2 which seems like too little time

What do you mean "too little time"?  How long do you think it takes to launch a fully integrated vehicle?  They can turn around SLC-40 in less than two weeks, and that pad only supports one vehicle at a time.

Offline RocketLover0119

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2887
  • Space Geek
  • Tampa, Florida
  • Liked: 6767
  • Likes Given: 1607
Core plus stage 2 on the roll today. 2 weeks exactly until CSG-2 which seems like too little time

What do you mean "too little time"?  How long do you think it takes to launch a fully integrated vehicle?  They can turn around SLC-40 in less than two weeks, and that pad only supports one vehicle at a time.

Very true, however I only just realized this was heading to 39a, which now makes even more sense that this core is for this mission.
"The Starship has landed"

Core plus stage 2 on the roll today. 2 weeks exactly until CSG-2 which seems like too little time

What do you mean "too little time"?  How long do you think it takes to launch a fully integrated vehicle?  They can turn around SLC-40 in less than two weeks, and that pad only supports one vehicle at a time.

Very true, however I only just realized this was heading to 39a, which now makes even more sense that this core is for this mission.

Not necessarily going to LC-39A.  It's actually a mile shorter going past the Kennedy VAB to SLC-40 from Hangar X

Offline spacevalley27

  • Member
  • Posts: 35
  • Liked: 131
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: SpaceX F9 : Starlink Group 4-6 : KSC LC-39A : January 2022
« Reply #11 on: 01/10/2022 07:25 pm »
It's a hypothesis, but I wouldn't rule it out also because I think the source is pretty reliable (it's still his hypothesis but it might not be outlandish).

I think it is difficult to be sure, however, we have to wait.

https://twitter.com/alexphysics13/status/1480620949170966528?s=21

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9029
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 5537
  • Likes Given: 50687
Re: SpaceX F9 : Starlink Group 4-6 : KSC LC-39A : January 2022
« Reply #12 on: 01/11/2022 08:21 pm »
From Spaceflight Now, dated Jan 6:

Quote
Two more Falcon 9 flights with Starlink satellites are slated this month, bringing the total tally to seven missions on the range schedule at Cape Canaveral. Launch dates for the next two Starlink missions were unavailable Thursday.

In a press release this week, the Space Force said five of the seven launches planned this month will head southeast or south from Cape Canaveral...[includes the two Starlink launches previously mentioned in quote]

https://spaceflightnow.com/launch-schedule/  [dated Jan 5]
Quote
January • Falcon 9 • Starlink
Launch time: TBD
Launch site: LC-39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida
...
Jan. 24 • Falcon 9 • CSG 2
Launch time: Approx. 2311:12 GMT (6:11:12 p.m. EST)
Launch site: SLC-40, Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida
...
January • Falcon 9 • Starlink
Launch time: TBD
Launch site: LC-39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida

https://nextspaceflight.com/launches/details/5337
Quote
Starlink Group 4-6
Launch Time
NET January, 2022
https://nextspaceflight.com/launches/details/5338
Quote
Starlink Group 4-7
Launch Time
NET January, 2022
« Last Edit: 01/11/2022 08:25 pm by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.)
My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!"

Online scr00chy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1115
  • Czechia
    • ElonX.net
  • Liked: 1576
  • Likes Given: 1248
Re: SpaceX F9 : Starlink Group 4-6 : KSC LC-39A : January 2022
« Reply #13 on: 01/11/2022 10:42 pm »
http://www.launchphotography.com/Launch_Viewing_Guide.html

Quote
Other upcoming launches include more batches of Starlink satellites from pad 39A on mid-January TBA.

Offline Raul

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 350
  • Ústí nad Orlicí, CZECH
  • Liked: 1176
  • Likes Given: 99
Corresponding active NOTAM in Johannesburg Oceanic information region for Stage2 reentry refers to primary launch date NET 17 Jan.

Quote
JOHANNESBURG OCEANIC
NOTAM #: A0108/22   Class: International   Status: Active   Issue Date UTC: 01/11/2022 1715   Start Date UTC: 01/17/2022 2344   End Date UTC: 01/22/2022 0537
A0108/22 NOTAMN
Q) FAJO/QWMLW/IV/BO/W/000/999/4916S02253E999
A) FAJO B) 2201172344 C) 2201220537
D) DLY 2344-0537
E) (5000S 01000W, 5105S 00043E, 5046S 01454E, 5033S 02134E, 4652S
03917E, 4319S 05025E, 4437S 05106E, 5416S 01806E, 5422S 00406E, 5244S
00043E, 5428S 00431W, 5348S 01000W, 2000S 01000W): ROCKET RE-ENTRY
OPS TAKING PLACE.
F) SFC G) UNL

Offline lenny97

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 118
  • Pescara, Abruzzo - Italy
  • Liked: 221
  • Likes Given: 231
Corresponding active NOTAM in Johannesburg Oceanic information region for Stage2 reentry refers to primary launch date NET 17 Jan.

Quote
JOHANNESBURG OCEANIC
NOTAM #: A0108/22   Class: International   Status: Active   Issue Date UTC: 01/11/2022 1715   Start Date UTC: 01/17/2022 2344   End Date UTC: 01/22/2022 0537
A0108/22 NOTAMN
Q) FAJO/QWMLW/IV/BO/W/000/999/4916S02253E999
A) FAJO B) 2201172344 C) 2201220537
D) DLY 2344-0537
E) (5000S 01000W, 5105S 00043E, 5046S 01454E, 5033S 02134E, 4652S
03917E, 4319S 05025E, 4437S 05106E, 5416S 01806E, 5422S 00406E, 5244S
00043E, 5428S 00431W, 5348S 01000W, 2000S 01000W): ROCKET RE-ENTRY
OPS TAKING PLACE.
F) SFC G) UNL


And this one quotes exactly: STARLINK 4-6 Debris.
Same dates.


Quote
A0053/22 NOTAMN Q) SUEO/QRDCA/IV/BO /W /000/999/3748S04632W233 A) SUEO B) 2201172344  C) 2201220537 E) ..D.. ACT DUE TO FALLING DEBRIS OF STARLINK 4-6 ROCKET, AREA FORMED BY THE UNION OF THE FLW COORD: 355900S0502200W-352800S0495800W-371600S0452700W-390000S0422700W-39000 0S0442900W-400000S0445900W-384500S0482300W-355900S0502200W (ATLANTIC OCEAN) F) GND  G) UNL
Founder of www.spacevoyaging.com — Independent Space News Blog
I'm based in Pescara, Italy. Music addicted.

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1903
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 3221
  • Likes Given: 3322
From the latest FAA ATCSCC Operations Plan:

Quote from: FAA
PRIMARY:        18/0016-0323Z    -STARLINK 4-6
BACKUP          18/2304-0301Z
BACKUP          19/2243-0330Z
BACKUP          20/2221-0308Z
BACKUP          21/2159-0246Z

https://www.fly.faa.gov/adv/adv_otherdis.jsp?advn=16&adv_date=01122022&facId=DCC&title=OPERATIONS+PLAN&titleDate=01/12/22

Offline vaporcobra

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2470
  • Tacoma, WA
  • Liked: 7674
  • Likes Given: 8786
From the latest FAA ATCSCC Operations Plan:

Quote from: FAA
PRIMARY:        18/0016-0323Z    -STARLINK 4-6

Just for posterity, that's 7:16pm-10:23pm EST, January 17th.
« Last Edit: 01/12/2022 08:21 pm by vaporcobra »

Offline Elthiryel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 422
  • Kraków, Poland
  • Liked: 973
  • Likes Given: 11518
From Ben Cooper's website:
Quote
Falcon 9 will launch the next batch of Starlink satellites from pad 39A on January 17 around 7:30pm EST.
[update Jan 12]
« Last Edit: 01/14/2022 07:59 pm by zubenelgenubi »
GO for launch, GO for age of reflight

Offline Zed_Noir

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4541
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1411
  • Likes Given: 1163
Will Group 4-6 lofted up 49 Starlink v1.5 comsats like for Group 4-5?

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement SkyTale Software GmbH
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0