Hail Damage at Pad A (STS-117) - ROLLBACK

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 18 Next
Author Topic: Hail Damage at Pad A (STS-117) - ROLLBACK  (Read 44765 times)
voyager
Veteran
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 568
Location: Kennedy Space Center, Florida



« on: 02/27/2007 11:45 AM »

Reports of hail damage to the ET tank from late yesterday.
Teams will inspect this morning. Potential rollback??
More to come.
Advertisement
« on: 02/27/2007 11:45 AM »

 
C5C6
Regular
Full Member
****
Offline

Posts: 251
Location: Córdoba - Argentina



WWW
« Reply #1 on: 02/27/2007 12:00 PM »

whats the 'hail' of the ET???
DaveS
Shuttle program observer
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 6011
Location: Sweden


« Reply #2 on: 02/27/2007 12:12 PM »

Quote
voyager - 27/2/2007  12:45 PM

Reports of hail damage to the ET tank from late yesterday.
Teams will inspect this morning. Potential rollback??
More to come.
Hail damage is confirmed. Teams will be assessing whether the damage is severe enough to warrant a rollback to the VAB for reparis. All the damage is limited to the upper sections of the LOX tank.

Last time a stack was rolled back to the VAB for ET SOFI repairs due to hail was on STS-96. This only led to a 7 day delay of the launch. The launch was originally scheduled for May 20 1999, launch occured as planned on the new launch date of May 27 1999.
DaveS
Shuttle program observer
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 6011
Location: Sweden


« Reply #3 on: 02/27/2007 12:25 PM »

GVA extended and hood lowered on the ET for close-up inspections of the damage:
MarkD
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 700


« Reply #4 on: 02/27/2007 12:28 PM »

A week's delay doesn't ruin the fun. Better to be safe than sorry.
paulhbell07
Extreme Veteran
Full Member
****
Offline

Posts: 448
Location: South Yorkshire


« Reply #5 on: 02/27/2007 12:42 PM »

Just when everyone thinks NASA has the foam on the ET nearly fixed, this comes up. Will the woodpeckers return next.


But I agree one week is nothing. Lets play it safe.
Chris Bergin
NSF Managing Editor
Administrator
*****
Online

Posts: 57098



« Reply #6 on: 02/27/2007 01:09 PM »

We're waiting for people we know to get into work. Bloody typical as this was all a pretty smooth flow, but this is totally out of people's control.
Terry Rocket
Veteran
Full Member
****
Offline

Posts: 264
Location: Birmingham, England


« Reply #7 on: 02/27/2007 01:25 PM »

Damn. Any possibility this is not bad enough to cause a rollback?
Andy USA
Lead Moderator
Administrator
*****
Offline

Posts: 720



« Reply #8 on: 02/27/2007 01:33 PM »

I wonder if it's really that bad, as the last image before the cap went back on wasn't so bad?
Chris Bergin
NSF Managing Editor
Administrator
*****
Online

Posts: 57098



« Reply #9 on: 02/27/2007 02:02 PM »

Mr ET guy having a look:
Chris Bergin
NSF Managing Editor
Administrator
*****
Online

Posts: 57098



« Reply #10 on: 02/27/2007 02:06 PM »

DaveS
Shuttle program observer
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 6011
Location: Sweden


« Reply #11 on: 02/27/2007 02:12 PM »

I guess this will be discussed during the FRR which is to begin today. Chris, can you confirm that it has started?
nathan.moeller
Max-Q MS2
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 3573
Location: Lubbock, TX



WWW
« Reply #12 on: 02/27/2007 02:12 PM »

Do we have any idea when a decision will be made?  A week-long delay won't kill the chances of launching next month.  It'll just be a little earlier in the morning for the U.S. guys to watch.  No big deal.
Chris Bergin
NSF Managing Editor
Administrator
*****
Online

Posts: 57098



« Reply #13 on: 02/27/2007 02:14 PM »

Quote
DaveS - 27/2/2007  2:12 PM

I guess this will be discussed during the FRR which is to begin today. Chris, can you confirm that it has started?

Will do when I get word. I've sent enough e-mails out ;)
nathan.moeller
Max-Q MS2
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 3573
Location: Lubbock, TX



WWW
« Reply #14 on: 02/27/2007 02:20 PM »

Who doesn't want this job? ;)
Tags:
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 18 Next
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 3.1 Public | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC
All content © 2005-2009 NASASpaceFlight.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.034 seconds with 18 queries.