Author Topic: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)  (Read 9366 times)

I started work on this as a PowerPoint that gives a run down of SpaceX's history for people who may not know anything about SpaceX. Feel free to reply with corrections or with suggestions to what you think should or shouldn't be included. I will apply corrections and additions that are recommended. I have included a PDF version of what I think to me a mostly completed guide to almost everything SpaceX.

Whenever i reply saying that I've updated the PDF, it will be here.
« Last Edit: 12/02/2017 01:07 AM by basedoesgames »
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Already an update. I didn't feel like firing up Photoshop when making the Title Screen to remove the white from the BFR picture. It now looks like the other Falcons. Provided Updated download on main post.
« Last Edit: 11/15/2017 10:05 PM by basedoesgames »
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Online almightycat

  • Member
  • Posts: 5
  • Sweden
  • Liked: 10
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #2 on: 11/15/2017 10:13 PM »
Just a small thing, It's Vandenberg not Vandenburg  ;)
« Last Edit: 11/15/2017 10:13 PM by almightycat »

Offline nacnud

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2129
  • Liked: 299
  • Likes Given: 162
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #3 on: 11/15/2017 10:13 PM »
I don't think the landing zone in Vandenberg is called LZ-2

Only one extra landing pad is currently being build at LC-13

Hope that helps

Just a small thing, It's Vandenberg not Vandenburg  ;)

Dang it. :P Fixed now, Thanks.
« Last Edit: 11/15/2017 10:21 PM by basedoesgames »
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

I don't think the landing zone in Vandenberg is called LZ-2

Only one extra landing pad is currently being build at LC-13

Hope that helps

For most things on here, while i do know a good amount on my own, was referenced from Wikipedia, which could be out of date. Here is the link for the LZ-1 Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landing_Zone_1
It says "An additional four 150 feet (46 m) diameter pads were initially planned to be built to support the simultaneous recovery of additional boosters of the Falcon Heavy, although only two additional pads are planned for the near future."

As for Vandenberg, i'm not sure either. I'll have to update it as i can find better info. I've just heard it referred to as LZ-2.
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline calapine

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 171
  • Linz, Austria
  • Liked: 135
  • Likes Given: 86
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #6 on: 11/15/2017 11:12 PM »
Might be debatable depending on definitions, but I would say BFR was announced before Sept 2017.

ITS presented at IAC 2016 was the rocket unofficially called BFR hitherto, and BFR presented at IAC 2017 is just a downscaled ITS.

Offline flyright

  • Member
  • Posts: 96
  • Denver, Colorado
  • Liked: 90
  • Likes Given: 135
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #7 on: 11/15/2017 11:15 PM »
Regarding the slide for FH:

"It will be the worlds most powerful rocket ever launched"

Might want to say this instead:

It will be the world's most powerful rocket currently flying


Might be debatable depending on definitions, but I would say BFR was announced before Sept 2017.

ITS presented at IAC 2016 was the rocket unofficially called BFR hitherto, and BFR presented at IAC 2017 is just a downscaled ITS.

When i wrote that part, i focused more on the newer BFR announcements. I will probably make a slide for ITS since it, to me, is a different vehicle. Thanks for the input though!
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Regarding the slide for FH:

"It will be the worlds most powerful rocket ever launched"

Might want to say this instead:

It will be the world's most powerful rocket currently flying

I'm guessing you're saying this since BFR would beat it out of that spot once it launches but i do agree that it should be said like that.
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2946
  • Liked: 1376
  • Likes Given: 915
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #10 on: 11/15/2017 11:38 PM »
Regarding the slide for FH:

"It will be the worlds most powerful rocket ever launched"

Might want to say this instead:

It will be the world's most powerful rocket currently flying

I'm guessing you're saying this since BFR would beat it out of that spot once it launches but i do agree that it should be said like that.

Saturn V, Shuttle, and N-1 were all more powerful and were all launched (with varying degress of success).

Phrase it as "Falcon Heavy will, once first launched, be the most powerful rocket currently in operation."

Regarding the slide for FH:

"It will be the worlds most powerful rocket ever launched"

Might want to say this instead:

It will be the world's most powerful rocket currently flying

I'm guessing you're saying this since BFR would beat it out of that spot once it launches but i do agree that it should be said like that.

Saturn V, Shuttle, and N-1 were all more powerful and were all launched (with varying degress of success).

Phrase it as "Falcon Heavy will, once first launched, be the most powerful rocket currently in operation."

I have just checked and I was wrong :P I'm currently working on an updated version so getting these inputs now is helpful.
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2946
  • Liked: 1376
  • Likes Given: 915
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #12 on: 11/15/2017 11:59 PM »
BFR is not to scale in the first image, it is about 50% taller than Falcon 9. See this SpaceX illustration:
https://img.purch.com/w/660/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zcGFjZS5jb20v
aW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzA3MC80Njcvb3JpZ2luYWwvYmZyLXNpemUtZGlhZ3JhbS5qcGc=

Quote
September 28, 2008: SpaceX was the first private company to
launch a Liquid Fueled Rocket to orbit.

Should be: "SpaceX became the first company to launch a privately developed liquid fueled rocket to orbit."

Earlier private companies had launched liquid fueled rockets to orbit, but those designs were developed with a large share of public funds.

Quote
4 Launches were Dragon Launches (1 Orbital Test, 1 Demo Test,
and 2 CRS Missions)

All 5 v1.0 flights launched Dragon: 1 test flight, 2 Demo flights, and 2 CRS flights.

Falcon 9 versions are typically denoted v1.0, v1.1, v1.2 (aka Full Thrust or FT), where the "v" stands for version.

I would put a date qualifier on the number of flights of v1.2, as it changes frequently.

"Orbcomm-11 Mission" should be "Orbcomm OG-2 Mission 2"



« Last Edit: 11/17/2017 12:35 PM by Chris Bergin »

I Assume by Date Qualifier you mean the date it was edited? Thank you for the input by the way!
« Last Edit: 11/17/2017 12:35 PM by Chris Bergin »
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

I have just Updated the PDF with new slides and fixed issues.
It now talks about SpaceX Launch Sites. Thank you for the input so far guys.
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2946
  • Liked: 1376
  • Likes Given: 915
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #15 on: 11/16/2017 12:45 AM »
Nice!

I'd recommend leading off with Falcon 1, F9, and Falcon Heavy, then the launch sites, the landing sites, and ITS/BFR last.

Maybe throw in a slide about Merlin and Raptor too.

Offline AS-503

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 422
  • Orion Fab Team
  • Colorado USA
  • Liked: 153
  • Likes Given: 108
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #16 on: 11/16/2017 12:46 AM »
Regarding the slide for FH:

"It will be the worlds most powerful rocket ever launched"

Might want to say this instead:

It will be the world's most powerful rocket currently flying

I'm guessing you're saying this since BFR would beat it out of that spot once it launches but i do agree that it should be said like that.

Saturn V, Shuttle, and N-1 were all more powerful and were all launched (with varying degress of success).

Phrase it as "Falcon Heavy will, once first launched, be the most powerful rocket currently in operation."

Of course your point has been made, but let's not forget Energia (Polyus/Buran) the Russians deserve the credit and the Energia booster has a much better track record than the N-1.

I just released an updated PDF.

Whats New?
Reordered some slides
Added section on engines

Probably the last update for me tonight... unless there is a big issue. Thank you all for the input so far!
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline ChrisC

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1436
  • Liked: 274
  • Likes Given: 294
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #18 on: 11/16/2017 02:42 AM »
Feedback after skimming the slides:

Black text on dark grey background really is not legible.

Vandenberg's landing site is not called LZ-2.

It's vs its.  http://www.angryflower.com/itsits.gif
How to embed photos from outside sources (e.g. Twitter)
NASA TV in HD:  history and FAQ (from 2007-2010 startup period)

Offline MrHollifield

  • Member
  • Posts: 55
  • Charleston, SC USA
  • Liked: 17
  • Likes Given: 28
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #19 on: 11/16/2017 09:50 AM »
Great presentation, but since you asked for feedback ...
<grabs blue pencil>
-Slide 4 says Falcon 1 was an "expendable rocket design." It was an expendable rocket, "design" just confuses the issue.
-Slide 5 says there were 4 Falcon 9 v1.0 launches, but there were 5, as is correctly noted on slide 6.
-Slide 8 says the v1.1 had 60% more thrust and weight than v1.0. Wouldn't increasing weight the same amount as thrust eliminate the benefit of increasing the thrust. I don't have the numbers, but suspect that weight growth was less than thrust increase from v1.0 to v1.1.
-Slide 16 says SLC-40 is "on at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station." Here "on" and "at" are redundant and "the" is unnecessary.
-Slide 18 has 3 instances of "SLC-40" where "SLC-4" is intended.
-Slide 19 says Boca Chica will be operational "no later than late 2018." Do you mean "no earlier than?" There is a bunch of work to be done there (about 99%l of it) and "late 2018" is only 13 months away.
-Slide 23 says SpaceX owns the ASDSes. I believe those are leased, not owned.
-Slide 29 includes the Merlin 1B engine that was planned but never produced.
-Slide 30 says Draco thrusters were used for attitude control on early F9 flights. Do you have a citation for that? I've been following SpaceX since the F1 days and never heard of Draco being used in that function.
-Slide 31 says Falcon Heavy is "still currently" in design. "Still" and "currently" mean almost the same thing; I'd delete "still."


General note: I find Random and inconsistent Capitalization a Distraction. I would suggest restricting capitalization to the standard first words and proper nouns.

Online smndk

  • Member
  • Member
  • Posts: 74
  • Denmark
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 11
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #20 on: 11/16/2017 10:54 AM »
Great work.

I have one comment: I do not believe that the AMOS-6 failure were due to overpressurization of the second stage. The cause were far more complex. Someone can probably explain it much better, but I believe it were due to oxygen solidifying inside the carbon composite of the helium tanks COPVs. This due to design and propellant loading speed and temperature.

/Svend

Great work.

I have one comment: I do not believe that the AMOS-6 failure were due to overpressurization of the second stage. The cause were far more complex. Someone can probably explain it much better, but I believe it were due to oxygen solidifying inside the carbon composite of the helium tanks COPVs. This due to design and propellant loading speed and temperature.

/Svend

That is correct and i believe the solid oxygen caused the helium tanks to expand and rupture, thus causing over pressurization. I could be wrong though. May have to rewatch Scott Manley's video :P
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Great presentation, but since you asked for feedback ...
<grabs blue pencil>
-Slide 4 says Falcon 1 was an "expendable rocket design." It was an expendable rocket, "design" just confuses the issue.
-Slide 5 says there were 4 Falcon 9 v1.0 launches, but there were 5, as is correctly noted on slide 6.
-Slide 8 says the v1.1 had 60% more thrust and weight than v1.0. Wouldn't increasing weight the same amount as thrust eliminate the benefit of increasing the thrust. I don't have the numbers, but suspect that weight growth was less than thrust increase from v1.0 to v1.1.
-Slide 16 says SLC-40 is "on at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station." Here "on" and "at" are redundant and "the" is unnecessary.
-Slide 18 has 3 instances of "SLC-40" where "SLC-4" is intended.
-Slide 19 says Boca Chica will be operational "no later than late 2018." Do you mean "no earlier than?" There is a bunch of work to be done there (about 99%l of it) and "late 2018" is only 13 months away.
-Slide 23 says SpaceX owns the ASDSes. I believe those are leased, not owned.
-Slide 29 includes the Merlin 1B engine that was planned but never produced.
-Slide 30 says Draco thrusters were used for attitude control on early F9 flights. Do you have a citation for that? I've been following SpaceX since the F1 days and never heard of Draco being used in that function.
-Slide 31 says Falcon Heavy is "still currently" in design. "Still" and "currently" mean almost the same thing; I'd delete "still."


General note: I find Random and inconsistent Capitalization a Distraction. I would suggest restricting capitalization to the standard first words and proper nouns.

All of this will be implemented/corrected/fixed. The reason for the capitalization issues was because i kept debating what should be capitalized. But i'll spend some time going back and fixing these issues. Will release the updated version later today.
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline OneSpeed

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 549
  • Liked: 582
  • Likes Given: 480
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #23 on: 11/16/2017 12:02 PM »
Slide 8 says the v1.1 had 60% more thrust and weight than v1.0. Wouldn't increasing weight the same amount as thrust eliminate the benefit of increasing the thrust. I don't have the numbers, but suspect that weight growth was less than thrust increase from v1.0 to v1.1.

If the thrust and mass increase together, then you are simply scaling up the rocket. You will be getting more mass, and more payload to orbit. Mass growth has actually been greater than thrust growth so far:

Falcon 9 version1.0 1.11.2 Block 11.2 Block 4
Relative thrust1.0 5,885/4,940 = 1.196,806/4,940 = 1.387,607/4,940 = 1.54
Relative mass1.0 505,846/333,400 = 1.52549,054/333,400 = 1.65549,054/333,400 = 1.65

Edit: So, v1.1 'had 20% more thrust and 50% more weight' than 1.0 would be more accurate.
« Last Edit: 11/17/2017 08:17 PM by OneSpeed »

Online smndk

  • Member
  • Member
  • Posts: 74
  • Denmark
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 11
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #24 on: 11/16/2017 12:41 PM »
Great work.

I have one comment: I do not believe that the AMOS-6 failure were due to overpressurization of the second stage. The cause were far more complex. Someone can probably explain it much better, but I believe it were due to oxygen solidifying inside the carbon composite of the helium tanks COPVs. This due to design and propellant loading speed and temperature.

/Svend

That is correct and i believe the solid oxygen caused the helium tanks to expand and rupture, thus causing over pressurization. I could be wrong though. May have to rewatch Scott Manley's video :P

I believe that in the end it was due to friction igniting the oxygen. Not overpressurization. Below is a link to SpaceX announcing their findings:

http://www.spacex.com/news/2016/09/01/anomaly-updates
« Last Edit: 11/16/2017 12:44 PM by smndk »

Great presentation, but since you asked for feedback ...
<grabs blue pencil>
-Slide 4 says Falcon 1 was an "expendable rocket design." It was an expendable rocket, "design" just confuses the issue.
-Slide 5 says there were 4 Falcon 9 v1.0 launches, but there were 5, as is correctly noted on slide 6.
-Slide 8 says the v1.1 had 60% more thrust and weight than v1.0. Wouldn't increasing weight the same amount as thrust eliminate the benefit of increasing the thrust. I don't have the numbers, but suspect that weight growth was less than thrust increase from v1.0 to v1.1.
-Slide 16 says SLC-40 is "on at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station." Here "on" and "at" are redundant and "the" is unnecessary.
-Slide 18 has 3 instances of "SLC-40" where "SLC-4" is intended.
-Slide 19 says Boca Chica will be operational "no later than late 2018." Do you mean "no earlier than?" There is a bunch of work to be done there (about 99%l of it) and "late 2018" is only 13 months away.
-Slide 23 says SpaceX owns the ASDSes. I believe those are leased, not owned.
-Slide 29 includes the Merlin 1B engine that was planned but never produced.
-Slide 30 says Draco thrusters were used for attitude control on early F9 flights. Do you have a citation for that? I've been following SpaceX since the F1 days and never heard of Draco being used in that function.
-Slide 31 says Falcon Heavy is "still currently" in design. "Still" and "currently" mean almost the same thing; I'd delete "still."


General note: I find Random and inconsistent Capitalization a Distraction. I would suggest restricting capitalization to the standard first words and proper nouns.

"-Slide 30 says Draco thrusters were used for attitude control on early F9 flights. Do you have a citation for that? I've been following SpaceX since the F1 days and never heard of Draco being used in that function."

Here is the quote from the Wikipedia Page: "These engines were also used on early Falcon 9 upper stages to provide attitude control, but more recent versions now use nitrogen cold gas thrusters in place of Dracos" (Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draco_(rocket_engine_family) )

-Slide 23 says SpaceX owns the ASDSes. I believe those are leased, not owned.
SpaceX contracted contracted a Louisiana Shipyard to build them both.

Still working on correcting issues and will be fixing Capitalization issues too.

@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline nacnud

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2129
  • Liked: 299
  • Likes Given: 162
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #26 on: 11/16/2017 01:17 PM »
Quote
Slide 4 says Falcon 1 was an "expendable rocket design."

The first stage was designed from the outset to be recoverable, though this was never achieved.

Offline old_sellsword

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 629
  • Liked: 529
  • Likes Given: 453
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #27 on: 11/16/2017 01:46 PM »
Here is the quote from the Wikipedia Page: "These engines were also used on early Falcon 9 upper stages to provide attitude control, but more recent versions now use nitrogen cold gas thrusters in place of Dracos" (Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draco_(rocket_engine_family) )

Thatís wrong, they never used Dracos for attitude control on any version of Falcon 9. That was only planned for the Block 2 revision of v1.0, which never flew and was overridden by the debut of v1.1.

All F9 upper stages have used Nitrogen cold gas thrusters.

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2946
  • Liked: 1376
  • Likes Given: 915
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #28 on: 11/16/2017 01:49 PM »
Great work.

I have one comment: I do not believe that the AMOS-6 failure were due to overpressurization of the second stage. The cause were far more complex. Someone can probably explain it much better, but I believe it were due to oxygen solidifying inside the carbon composite of the helium tanks COPVs. This due to design and propellant loading speed and temperature.

/Svend

That is correct and i believe the solid oxygen caused the helium tanks to expand and rupture, thus causing over pressurization. I could be wrong though. May have to rewatch Scott Manley's video :P

I believe that in the end it was due to friction igniting the oxygen. Not overpressurization. Below is a link to SpaceX announcing their findings:

http://www.spacex.com/news/2016/09/01/anomaly-updates

In a presentation intended for very non-spaceflight-geek audience, I would simply say: "An upper stage helium bottle exploded, destroying the rocket and payload."

The exact technical cause of the explosion and the source of the ignition are far beyond the required level of detail.

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2946
  • Liked: 1376
  • Likes Given: 915
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #29 on: 11/16/2017 01:53 PM »
-Slide 23 says SpaceX owns the ASDSes. I believe those are leased, not owned.
SpaceX contracted contracted a Louisiana Shipyard to build them both.

They were "built" by modifying existing barges, which were leased. The distinction is probably unnecessary here, as you can just say "SpaceX has 2 droneships".

The PDF has been updated.

Whats new?
It now includes Dragon
Fixed capitalization
Corrected some misinformation 

Word Count: 1362
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline ludovic_f

  • Member
  • Posts: 5
  • France
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 22
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #31 on: 11/17/2017 07:13 AM »
Great work there basedoesgames!

I didn't catch anything obvious that wasn't already reported before the engine section: you are not mentionning the Super Draco at all.

But all else is very nicely put!

Great work there basedoesgames!

I didn't catch anything obvious that wasn't already reported before the engine section: you are not mentionning the Super Draco at all.

But all else is very nicely put!

I do mention SuperDraco but i could include the specs for it. I'll put that in the next update. Thanks by the way!
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Online tleski

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 356
  • Washington, DC
  • Liked: 231
  • Likes Given: 309
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #33 on: 11/17/2017 12:49 PM »
Could you include Kestrel engine for completeness? It was used on Falcon 1 second stage.
The guide looks really nice, thanks for your effort!
« Last Edit: 11/17/2017 12:49 PM by tleski »

Updated PDF

Whats New?
Stats for SuperDraco
Kestrel Engine

Thank You all for the input so far. Maybe i'll have to make a guide for ULA :P That'd be a long one
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline Formica

  • Rocket Boi
  • Member
  • Posts: 54
  • Richmond, CA
  • Liked: 54
  • Likes Given: 314
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #35 on: 11/17/2017 06:46 PM »
This is turning into a good SpaceX primer  :)

Errata:

Slide "South Texas Launch Site". It is more accurate to say that Boca Chica is licensed for twelve launches, of which two may be Falcon Heavy launches; they are not licensed for fourteen launches in total. It is quite likely that Boca Chica will technically be able to support (the verbage you currently use) much more than the twelve launches they're currently licensed for. Nitpicky, but you did ask for feedback  :) Looking forward to seeing this tuned up, I'll start tossing it at folks who ask me what this SpaceX thing is all about. Thank you for creating it!
I'm just a space fan, please correct me if I'm wrong!

Offline c4fusion

  • Member
  • Posts: 10
  • Sleeper Service
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 27
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #36 on: 11/22/2017 07:25 AM »
Since you mentioned what SLC-40 and Vandenberg were once used for, you should also mention that 39A is a historic launch pad where the Shuttle and Apollo missions (Saturn V) were launched.  Also the propulsive landing has been nixed for the dragon 2.  There are no longer any legs for it.  Otherwise, I like it, simple and to the point.

Offline SpacedX

  • Member
  • Posts: 25
  • Gatineau
  • Liked: 8
  • Likes Given: 583
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #37 on: 11/22/2017 10:29 PM »
Great work.

From slide 1's note of Not To Scale, I looked it up and it is now obvious what the latest version's size is.

With that in mind, could you take the title and put it at top (and shift left as required)? This might provide you with space to provide actual scale pictures.

Thanks for the effort.


Offline Beittil

About that Boca Chica slide... the overview images contains imaginary 2nd and 3rd launch pads + landing zones. These were all 'fan-fiction', might want to use the 'official' overview with just the one hanger/launch pad as it is currently in the EIS/design.

Offline CLCalver

  • Member
  • Posts: 12
  • Ontario
  • Liked: 3
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #39 on: 11/24/2017 11:26 AM »
On your first F9 page you show the 3x3 configuration for the engines, but you refer to Falcon 1. You should change it to Falcon 9 Version 1.0
Chris

PS: I really like your document. Great idea!
« Last Edit: 11/24/2017 11:37 AM by CLCalver »

The Post-Thanksgiving Break Update

What's New?
Scaling on first slide fixed
Credit to the NSF Forum
Restated somethings
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline ChrisC

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1436
  • Liked: 274
  • Likes Given: 294
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #41 on: 11/28/2017 03:26 AM »
Feedback after skimming the slides:

Black text on dark grey background really is not legible.

Vandenberg's landing site is not called LZ-2.

It's vs its.  http://www.angryflower.com/itsits.gif

All three problems are still in there! 
How to embed photos from outside sources (e.g. Twitter)
NASA TV in HD:  history and FAQ (from 2007-2010 startup period)

Offline intrepidpursuit

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
  • Orlando, FL
  • Liked: 286
  • Likes Given: 200
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #42 on: 11/28/2017 05:57 AM »
Page 9: "Also known ss v1.2" should be "Also known as v1.2".

Page 10: Falcon 9 being retired in 2019? Better not to put a death date on her just yet.
I agree with the others who've said that the stage was not over pressurized. There was an over pressure event, but that is different than being over pressurized which sounds like they just kept pumping after nozzle clicked off. The simplest accurate way to explain it is to say, "A Helium tank in the second stage burst resulting in the loss of the rocket and the payload."
Orbcomm OG-2 Mission 2? What does that mean? I've not seen the "Mission 2" designation before.

Page 24: As others have mentioned, the landing pad in Vandenberg is not called LZ-2.

Feedback after skimming the slides:

Black text on dark grey background really is not legible.

Vandenberg's landing site is not called LZ-2.

It's vs its.  http://www.angryflower.com/itsits.gif

All three problems are still in there!

Sorry, didn't see this. Will work on update.
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline old_sellsword

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 629
  • Liked: 529
  • Likes Given: 453
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #44 on: 11/28/2017 12:49 PM »
Orbcomm OG-2 Mission 2? What does that mean? I've not seen the "Mission 2" designation before.

Thatís correct, there were two Orbcomm OG-2 launches.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbcomm_(satellite)#Orbcomm-OG2

PDF updated

What's New?
Fixed Typos
Restated some things
Changed text color on title
Small improvments
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline deptrai

  • Member
  • Posts: 18
  • Liked: 6
  • Likes Given: 25
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #46 on: 11/28/2017 08:46 PM »
I like it.

You've mentioned the number of Super Draco engines, but don't mention the number of Merlins(9), MVACs (1) or Draco thrusters (18).

Another picture of a Draco thruster attached.

I like it.

You've mentioned the number of Super Draco engines, but don't mention the number of Merlins(9), MVACs (1) or Draco thrusters (18).

Another picture of a Draco thruster attached.

Thank you for the Draco pic. Will include in the numbers and pic in the next update.
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline jpo234

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
  • Liked: 492
  • Likes Given: 73
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #48 on: 11/30/2017 08:37 AM »
Slide 28, Dragon 2 says "First launch is planned for August 2018". That's the first manned flight, the unmanned Demo mission is currently planned for April '18.
You want to be inspired by things. You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great. That's what being a spacefaring civilization is all about. It's about believing in the future and believing the future will be better than the past. And I can't think of anything more exciting than being out there among the stars.

PDF Updated

What's New?
Added some pictures
Added some info
Small improvements
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Online tleski

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 356
  • Washington, DC
  • Liked: 231
  • Likes Given: 309
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #50 on: 12/01/2017 06:02 PM »
Now looks even better!

Two additional suggestions:

- slide 14 ->  Dragon title slide, it should show a large image of Dragon itself instead of a Falcon (with Dragon).

I would also add a slide at the end listing credits for all images used in the Guide (I know it's a lot of work but I am assuming most of them are sourced from SpaceX).


Online Dave G

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2008
  • Liked: 751
  • Likes Given: 1023
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #51 on: 12/01/2017 08:33 PM »
Two suggestions:

1) For the "First Landings" slide, show dates.

2) Remove the ITS slide.  It never made it past planning.  If you want to show stuff like that, then you'll also need to include Falcon 5, Falcon 1e, and other stuff that never made it past planning.
« Last Edit: 12/01/2017 08:37 PM by Dave G »

Offline MATTBLAK

  • Elite Veteran & 'J.A.F.A'
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3893
  • 'Space Cadets' Let us; UNITE!! (crickets chirping)
  • New Zealand
  • Liked: 806
  • Likes Given: 1517
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #52 on: 12/01/2017 08:58 PM »
You're doing an excellent job with a worthy project! All the best and keep at it...
"Those who can't, Blog".   'Space Cadets' of the World - Let us UNITE!! (crickets chirping)

PDF Updated

What's New?
Picture Credits
Falcon 1e and Falcon 5
Updated Images

Thanks for the input so far guys. Do you think i should make a beginners guide to the landings?
@baserunner0723
Beginners Guide to SpaceX: http://bit.ly/2jj8rqv

Offline Mader Levap

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 930
  • Liked: 383
  • Likes Given: 400
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #54 on: 12/24/2017 02:34 PM »
Do you think i should make a beginners guide to the landings?

Shouldn't it be new part of main PDF?

BTW I do not see any basis whatsoever for "Estimated fully operational period: 2017 - 2019".
« Last Edit: 12/24/2017 02:35 PM by Mader Levap »
Be successful.  Then tell the haters to (BLEEP) off. - deruch
...and if you have failure, tell it anyway.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4877
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 3535
  • Likes Given: 1133
Re: A Beginners Guide To (almost) Everything SpaceX (PDF)
« Reply #55 on: 12/24/2017 07:58 PM »
I too like the slides - thanks for all your effort on this.

SpaceX have now announced that the 2nd pad at the Cape is LZ-2. Itís ready for the forthcoming FH demo flight. Picture attached to:

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=44271.msg1760040#msg1760040

Tags: