Quote from: dustinthewind on 08/24/2016 01:51 amSomething that strikes me as interesting is if the vacuum is really a superposition of anti-matter and matter. Supposing a bonded pair has the same charge but the anti-matter counterpart behaves as if it has the opposite charge because time is reversed then they will behave as opposite charges but annihilate each other and yet they still exist. That is coming together means they cause a great disturbance in the QV which is the light created when they annihilate? If anti-matter really runs backwards in time and separating them causes a gradient in the time field then inducing a gradient in the time field may be as simple as charging a capacitor to a really high voltage. That is some charge on one plate will have an effect of slowing down time while the other would speed it up. This reminds me of WaiteDavidMSPhysics on youtube.com's videos here where he specifically addresses a charged capacitor effecting space time and find that it could induce a gradient in space time.: I would suggest listinging to 34:00 where he specifically says either negative or positive charge will behave as if it has exotic matter properties which I think means negative energy properties. Possibly like the anti-mater in the QV with time slowing effects? That is one of the charges on the capacitor might attract the anti matter? But then again there are both types of charges for anti-matter but maybe one charge of anti-matter is more massive than the other?According to the Reissner-Nordstrom equation, the sign of the charge doesn't matter. The refractive index is dependent on Q2 and the affect is anti-gravity, or an increase in the rate of a clock. The R-N solution results in a highly charged blackhole, will have a naked singularity and no event horizon. This is a very old paper. A lot of my understanding has changed since then, but this has not.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251231445_Event_horizons_in_the_PV_ModelAnti-matter does not have the affect of anti-gravity. Anti-matter has positive mass and opposite charge. However, you are correct in that, every point charge is surrounded by virtual electron-positron pairs. A real electron for example, will swap places with a virtual electron and this is called Exchange scattering. So at the scale of point charges, the vacuum is composed of matter-antimatter. But far from such strong fields, it is just photons IMO.
Something that strikes me as interesting is if the vacuum is really a superposition of anti-matter and matter. Supposing a bonded pair has the same charge but the anti-matter counterpart behaves as if it has the opposite charge because time is reversed then they will behave as opposite charges but annihilate each other and yet they still exist. That is coming together means they cause a great disturbance in the QV which is the light created when they annihilate? If anti-matter really runs backwards in time and separating them causes a gradient in the time field then inducing a gradient in the time field may be as simple as charging a capacitor to a really high voltage. That is some charge on one plate will have an effect of slowing down time while the other would speed it up. This reminds me of WaiteDavidMSPhysics on youtube.com's videos here where he specifically addresses a charged capacitor effecting space time and find that it could induce a gradient in space time.: I would suggest listinging to 34:00 where he specifically says either negative or positive charge will behave as if it has exotic matter properties which I think means negative energy properties. Possibly like the anti-mater in the QV with time slowing effects? That is one of the charges on the capacitor might attract the anti matter? But then again there are both types of charges for anti-matter but maybe one charge of anti-matter is more massive than the other?
I wasn't saying that anti-matter had the property of anti gravity. Rather I was suggesting the possibility that if anti-matter had the property of reverse time, that it would reverse the positive charge on anti-matter to behave as if it were a negative charge, or opposite of its counterpart. I was then suggesting that the polarization of the property of time in anti-matter and matter in the polarized QV could then be responsible for what we perceive as gravity. I was thinking of anti-matter as having positive stored energy if it is separated from matter in that if it comes back to matter, the electric field generated disturbs the quantum vacuum and makes the light seen from the annihilation effect. The light being the polarization of the QV.
Mberbs: - My cell phone does fly off and slams into the ground when released. Not sure of your question..
- ...”there is little logic...”. Remember that once you have a single stuff or substance and a single cause, these inferences are not only logically possible but even necessary. Two causes are one and the same. And if I say “it sounds like” it is offered and to be taken as such; : “sounds like”. These will appear where and when I try to parallel the metaphysics and known physics.
- “Here is a metaphysical description...”. That is not metaphysics. In true metaphysics “your are not there”. It is about what exists and what makes it evolve/change by itself. The time process was deduced from top-down according to what we know, and bottom-up, from a logical creation of the universe.This metaphysics is about what the universe is made of and what it does by itself spontaneously. Everything we know is about what we can do with the universe; it is on a need to know basis. The universe doesn’t need to know physics because it is ruled by simple logic. Metaphysics is extremely limited; substance, cause and some forms and shapes. That’s it! It has no predictive power; this is in the hands number logic or maths and physics.
QuoteBut in this posting we would like to announce a new superconductor thruster idea that Dr. Nassikas has come up with which should be able to produce 30,000 to a million times more thrust than his previous version. http://etheric.com/nassikas-thruster-II/---------------------------------------------A million times thrust with no energy spent? All I'll say is extraordinary claims require extraordinary data.Sorry guys and gals I've been very busy as of late but I haven't forgot anyone here and try to catch up when I can. Testing goes on and the anomaly still remains anonymous. A forced pulsed jerked dual mode of operation is providing some interesting clues. Much more later. My Very Best,Shell
But in this posting we would like to announce a new superconductor thruster idea that Dr. Nassikas has come up with which should be able to produce 30,000 to a million times more thrust than his previous version.
Uh actually I was not debating anything.
FYI:http://www.nist.gov/pml/div684/grp07/measuring-tiny-forces-with-light.cfm
Quote from: M.LeBel on 08/24/2016 06:30 pmMberbs: - My cell phone does fly off and slams into the ground when released. Not sure of your question..My original statement was...
...Now, if you would care to stop playing with flying cell phone and red fire trucks and put out a real question, I would be glad to tackle the problem with you. Bottom line; we have a job to do here and if you can’t teach me or learn from me this, conversation is pointless.
How on earth did we run into metaphysics? Without testable predictions, theories and ideas on the mechanics of the Universe are worse than useless.
Quote from: dustinthewind on 08/24/2016 09:32 pmI wasn't saying that anti-matter had the property of anti gravity. Rather I was suggesting the possibility that if anti-matter had the property of reverse time, that it would reverse the positive charge on anti-matter to behave as if it were a negative charge, or opposite of its counterpart. I was then suggesting that the polarization of the property of time in anti-matter and matter in the polarized QV could then be responsible for what we perceive as gravity. I was thinking of anti-matter as having positive stored energy if it is separated from matter in that if it comes back to matter, the electric field generated disturbs the quantum vacuum and makes the light seen from the annihilation effect. The light being the polarization of the QV. I don't think time works in this fashion. Time does not have a reverse per se. That's not to say that anti-matter will not mirror the opposite action of matter when formed(as in hurling in the opposite direction with an opposite spin), but it would do so in a forward time. Usually this comes from a misunderstanding of the Theory of Relativity. You are thinking in the right direction, though, to look for a process causing gravity and not just the mere presence of mass. I have just submitted an article for publishing on this topic and will post it here once the article is published.
Quote from: RotoSequence on 08/26/2016 07:49 pmHow on earth did we run into metaphysics? Without testable predictions, theories and ideas on the mechanics of the Universe are worse than useless. We are in a severe drought of experimental data to discuss.
It is my understanding that Eaglework's new paper has been today accepted for publication in a peer-review journal, where it will be published. I expect that Eagleworks should receive notification momentarily (it should be in the mail). Note: I have not heard this from anybody employed by NASA.