The Entire Shuttle Orbiter Fleet Feature Review Articles

Pages: [1] 2 Next  All
Author Topic: The Entire Shuttle Orbiter Fleet Feature Review Articles  (Read 15358 times)
Chris Bergin
NSF Managing Editor
Administrator
*****
Online

Posts: 84225



« on: 07/06/2011 05:28 PM »

The full set from Chris Gebhardt's fleet overviews. All five space flown orbiters, and now Enterprise too - every single shuttle mission over the past 30 years. Nine articles - 59,000 words.

Take some time to read the amazing history of these vehicles.

Enterprise
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/04/space-shuttle-enterprise-the-orbiter-that-started-it-all/


Columbia:
Part I:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/02/space-shuttle-columbia-a-new-beginning-and-vision/

Part II:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/02/columbia-ov-102-a-pioneer-to-the-end/

Challenger:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/01/1983-1986-missions-history-space-shuttle-challenger/

Discovery:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/02/workhorse-discovery-stands-ready-for-final-mission/

Atlantis:
Part I:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/07/ov-104atlantis-international-vehicle-changing-world/

Part II:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/07/shuttle-atlantis-mir-realization-program-goal/

Part III:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/07/reaching-end-atlantis-fight-against-retirement/

Endeavour:
Part I: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/04/space-shuttle-endeavour-a-new-beginning-part-i/

Part II:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/04/ov-105-endeavour-a-long-standing-dream-realized/
Advertisement
« on: 07/06/2011 05:28 PM »

 
Longhorn John
Regular
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 1367


« Reply #1 on: 07/06/2011 06:51 PM »

I've already read all of these, when I read through the new Atlantis ones, and they are all EXCELLENT!

No doubt, whiners and moaners will be too busy reading how much money it cost, but they could have spent 10 times as much and to get all this space flight out of it would have been very worthwhile.
KEdward5
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 701
Location: Dallas, TX


« Reply #2 on: 07/06/2011 07:20 PM »

Hail the orbiters!!
astrobrian
NSF MAX-Q
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 2926
Location: Austin Texas



WWW
« Reply #3 on: 07/07/2011 04:52 PM »

This is that good book you haven't read yet, amazing work on all of them.
KEdward5
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 701
Location: Dallas, TX


« Reply #4 on: 07/07/2011 06:31 PM »

Totally and utterly outstanding!
Terry Rocket
Veteran
Full Member
****
Offline

Posts: 316
Location: Birmingham, England



« Reply #5 on: 07/08/2011 08:33 AM »

A totally must read if ever there was one. This should be made into a book.
Chris Bergin
NSF Managing Editor
Administrator
*****
Online

Posts: 84225



« Reply #6 on: 07/25/2011 02:35 AM »

Bump. This shouldn't be on page 3 of the section.
Ronsmytheiii
Moderator
Global Moderator
*****
Online

Posts: 21594



« Reply #7 on: 08/02/2011 02:45 AM »

Bumping again, only missing Enterprise (yes she did not fly in space, but did much for the program)

Chris G, looks like you have started a book here.  Xerox it and sell it to HQ for a few hundred dollars a copy.
Andre_Berends
Member
*
Offline

Posts: 1
Location: Emmen, the Netherlands


« Reply #8 on: 08/03/2011 09:21 PM »

Interesting reading material... thanks!
Skylab
Member
Full Member
****
Offline

Posts: 337


« Reply #9 on: 08/12/2011 11:16 PM »

While I'm pretty impressed by all those articles, perhaps it's a good idea to tone down the statistics a bit? Nothing wrong with the latest article, but the others were slightly info-heavy! ;)
Space Pete
NASASpaceflight ISS Editor
Global Moderator
*****
Online

Posts: 6620
Location: UK


Mr. ISS


« Reply #10 on: 08/12/2011 11:29 PM »

While I'm pretty impressed by all those articles, perhaps it's a good idea to tone down the statistics a bit? Nothing wrong with the latest article, but the others were slightly info-heavy! ;)

You can never be too info-heavy, IMO - that's one of the reasons why I love this site. ;)
Chris Bergin
NSF Managing Editor
Administrator
*****
Online

Posts: 84225



« Reply #11 on: 08/13/2011 01:25 AM »

While I'm pretty impressed by all those articles, perhaps it's a good idea to tone down the statistics a bit? Nothing wrong with the latest article, but the others were slightly info-heavy! ;)

You missed the special twitter version:

"Atlantis - otherwise known as OV-104 - named after an old ship, went to MIR and ISS, now retired. THE END" ;D
Lee Jay
Elite Veteran
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 4982


« Reply #12 on: 08/13/2011 02:18 AM »

While I'm pretty impressed by all those articles, perhaps it's a good idea to tone down the statistics a bit? Nothing wrong with the latest article, but the others were slightly info-heavy! ;)

You can never be too info-heavy, IMO - that's one of the reasons why I love this site. ;)

Sure you can.

One of the reasons I love this site is Chris' ability to turn 500MB of separate NASA presentations and documents into a cohesive, informative article that leaves out most of the less important information while highlighting the really important stuff.  It's a difficult skill that not everyone can master, but he's really quite good at it.  For those of us that have limited time to devour everything on L2, this is quite important, and we can always go back to L2 to dig in if we're interested in more.

You do that pretty well too, Pete.
Tim S
Full Member
****
Offline

Posts: 442
Location: MSFC


« Reply #13 on: 10/16/2011 04:45 AM »

Going to have to go through all of these!
Chris Bergin
NSF Managing Editor
Administrator
*****
Online

Posts: 84225



« Reply #14 on: 04/27/2012 02:46 PM »

Now we have the full set!

Space Shuttle Enterprise – The Orbiter that started it all - by Chris Gebhardt:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/04/space-shuttle-enterprise-the-orbiter-that-started-it-all/
Tags:
Pages: [1] 2 Next  All
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 3.1 Public | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC
All content © 2005-2011 NASASpaceFlight.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.097 seconds with 22 queries.