Minotaur I - NROL-66 - Feb 5, 2011

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6 Next  All
Author Topic: Minotaur I - NROL-66 - Feb 5, 2011  (Read 23575 times)
Skyrocket
Extreme Veteran
Full Member
*****
Online

Posts: 1226
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany



WWW
« on: 01/27/2011 03:47 PM »

On February, 5th a Minotaur-1 rocket will launch a classified satellite payload for the U.S. National Reconnaissance Office from SLC-8, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. The launch is called NROL-66

Has anyone heared of any info on the payload or the orbit?
Advertisement
« on: 01/27/2011 03:47 PM »

 
simonbp
Science Guy
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 6274



« Reply #1 on: 01/27/2011 09:12 PM »

Must be pretty small for an NRO payload; presumably a tech pathfinder of some sort?
faustod
Full Member
****
Offline

Posts: 323
Location: Italy



« Reply #2 on: 02/03/2011 08:16 AM »

According to http://www.spaceflightnow.com/minotaur/nrol66/110202launchpreps/
the satellite is part of RPP (Rapid Pathfinder Program).
Ben the Space Brit
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 5065
Location: London, UK


A spaceflight fan


« Reply #3 on: 02/03/2011 11:38 AM »

Getting a launch contract from NRO is a big coup for OSC.  I'm presuming it says very good things about the perceived reliability of Minotaur-I.  Have they launched any previous NRO payloads?
Jim
Night Gator
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 17600
Location: Cape Canaveral Spaceport



« Reply #4 on: 02/03/2011 12:11 PM »

Getting a launch contract from NRO is a big coup for OSC.  I'm presuming it says very good things about the perceived reliability of Minotaur-I.  Have they launched any previous NRO payloads?

Yes
William Graham
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 3680


« Reply #5 on: 02/03/2011 12:35 PM »

Getting a launch contract from NRO is a big coup for OSC.  I'm presuming it says very good things about the perceived reliability of Minotaur-I.  Have they launched any previous NRO payloads?

Yes

That would be STEX on a Taurus in 1998
agman25
Full Member
****
Offline

Posts: 453


« Reply #6 on: 02/03/2011 11:12 PM »

What is the yellow material covering the bottom part of the booster. Thermal insulation?


http://spaceflightnow.com/minotaur/nrol66/110203gallery/
Skyrocket
Extreme Veteran
Full Member
*****
Online

Posts: 1226
Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany



WWW
« Reply #7 on: 02/03/2011 11:32 PM »

What is the yellow material covering the bottom part of the booster. Thermal insulation?

Yes
Jim
Night Gator
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 17600
Location: Cape Canaveral Spaceport



« Reply #8 on: 02/03/2011 11:42 PM »

What is the yellow material covering the bottom part of the booster. Thermal insulation?


http://spaceflightnow.com/minotaur/nrol66/110203gallery/

The Minuteman silos were "air conditioned" to maintain the SRM's at a constant temperature so that the performance was always the same for each vehicle.  The yellow material is a jacket in which conditioned air is pumped in
Rocket Guy
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 1363


« Reply #9 on: 02/04/2011 03:54 AM »

And the "banana peel" as it's called rips off at liftoff. See photos 3, 4 and 5.
http://www.launchphotography.com/Minotaur_TacSat.html
Ben the Space Brit
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 5065
Location: London, UK


A spaceflight fan


« Reply #10 on: 02/04/2011 08:41 AM »

What strikes me about the pictures from spaceflightnow is that they emphasise just how small the Minotaur is compared to liquid-fuelled LVs.  You could see one being launched from a V2-style mobile launcher!
edkyle99
Expert
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 7760



WWW
« Reply #11 on: 02/04/2011 03:44 PM »

What strikes me about the pictures from spaceflightnow is that they emphasise just how small the Minotaur is compared to liquid-fuelled LVs.  You could see one being launched from a V2-style mobile launcher!

Russia's Minuteman counterpart, Topol, does just that.  Several were used to orbit payloads under the START program, and those were launched from mobile launchers.  It was never clear to me why the U.S. did not develop a similar capability.

In terms of the solid/liquid size comparison, Falcon 1 is probably the best liquid comparison to Minotaur 1. 

Falcon 1 stands 21.3 meters, weighs 27.2 tonnes, and can carry 0.47 tonnes to 185 km x 9 deg from Kwajalein. 

Minotaur 1 is 19.21 meters tall, weighs 36.2 tonnes, and could boost 0.64 tonnes to 185 km x 28 deg if launched from Cape Canaveral.  It's a mighty little "pocket rocket".

- Ed Kyle
agman25
Full Member
****
Offline

Posts: 453


« Reply #12 on: 02/04/2011 03:47 PM »

What strikes me about the pictures from spaceflightnow is that they emphasise just how small the Minotaur is compared to liquid-fuelled LVs.  You could see one being launched from a V2-style mobile launcher!

Russia's Minuteman counterpart, Topol, does just that.  Several were used to orbit payloads under the START program, and those were launched from mobile launchers.  It was never clear to me why the U.S. did not develop a similar capability.

 - Ed Kyle
I guess the Trident fills the mobile ICBM role.
snowhole
Full Member
**
Offline

Posts: 49


« Reply #13 on: 02/04/2011 06:08 PM »

The VAFB site suggests launch window to be 4:26 am, is that local or UTC?
Rocket Guy
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 1363


« Reply #14 on: 02/04/2011 06:26 PM »

Local time.
Tags:
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6 Next  All
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 3.1 Public | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC
All content © 2005-2011 NASASpaceFlight.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.129 seconds with 22 queries.