Information about Soyuz rocket

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 24 Next
Author Topic: Information about Soyuz rocket  (Read 98172 times)
Nicolas PILLET
Member
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 1408
Location: Gien, France


WWW
« Reply #225 on: 05/30/2012 05:00 PM »

I've found a similar picture of the 77082843 mysterious Soyuz-U rocket in the october 2002 issue of Novosti Kosmonavtiki. So, we can deduce that it was a launch anterior to october 2002...!

(Yes, I know, this is little help...)
anik
NSF Russian and ISS Admin
Global Moderator
*****
Offline

Posts: 6460
Location: Moscow, Russia



WWW
« Reply #226 on: 06/14/2012 03:59 PM »

Soyuz-U rocket for Kosmos-2480 launch had s/n 78031229.
Soyuz-ST-B rocket for VS03 launch has s/n 009.
Nicolas PILLET
Member
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 1408
Location: Gien, France


WWW
« Reply #227 on: 06/17/2012 12:15 PM »

According to this picture, Cosmos 2000's launcher was N°78039386.

http://foto.mail.ru/community/kosmodrom-1/959/?page=4#/community/kosmodrom-1/959/
Stan Black
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 1287


« Reply #228 on: 06/17/2012 05:49 PM »

Rockets for Progress launches are below.

 You’ll notice from Anik’s list where the Soyuz-U2 dried up; and in order to keep Mir supported they had to find rockets from a variety of sources. Serial numbers starting with 7 were intended for military launches. Though the preferred choice was the regular Soyuz-U; you can also see that some Progress-M rockets serial numbers are out of sequence. There was two types of Soyuz-U rocket; 11А511У and 11А511У-ПВБ. The ПВБ variants were introduced for all R-7 based rockets after the disaster of 1980. What is still unclear why the first 11А511У-ПВБ carried Kosmos-1545 in 1984, but the 11А511У remained in service until 2004.



Прогресс М-18 Союз-У2 11А511У-2 №У15000-063

 Though carried by a U2 the rocket was fuelled with only kerosene.



Прогресс М-20 Союз-У 11А511У №77044270

 From the numerals 2x0 it looks like this was a rocket procured for a 17Ф42 Resurs-F2. I don’t know if this was a ПВБ.



Прогресс М-22 Союз-У 11А511У №76032992

 From the numerals 9x2 it looks like this was a rocket procured for a 11Ф695 Kobalt. This was probably a ПВБ.



Прогресс М-23 Союз-У2 11А511У-2 №76024355

 From the numerals 3x5 it looks like this was a rocket procured for a 17Ф12 Don. Like Progress M-18 the rocket was fuelled with only kerosene.



Прогресс М-32 Союз-У 11А511У-ПВБ №Х15000-049

 The first rocket attached to Progress M-32 suffered multiple failures, eventually leading to the rocket being returned to the manufacturer. A replacement was available in Baikonur; but I don’t know what was it’s intended payload. At a guess was the original 11А511У №Х15000-649?

http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/129/05.shtml



Прогресс М-33 Союз-У 11А511У №Х15000-639

 In 1996 there was a shortage of available rockets; not just for Progress M-33, but also Bion and Soyuz TM-25. The rocket made available lacked engines so these were sourced from the rocket originally supplied for Progress M-32.

http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/137/09.shtml



Прогресс М-36 Союз-У 11А511У-ПВБ №С15000-064



Прогресс М-43 Союз-У 11А511У-ПВБ №К15000-085



Прогресс М-45 Союз-У 11А511У-ПВБ №М15000-065

 A rocket left over from Globalstar.

http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/225/06.shtml



 There is one other example of a rocket being swapped; for a rocket not originally assigned to carry a Progress.

Прогресс М-55 Союз-У 11А511У-ПВБ №Ф15000-080

 This rocket was delivered to Baikonur in July 2004 for Resurs-DK.

http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/z13.07.04.shtml
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/station/crew-10/html/jsc2004e45198.html


anik
NSF Russian and ISS Admin
Global Moderator
*****
Offline

Posts: 6460
Location: Moscow, Russia



WWW
« Reply #229 on: 06/17/2012 09:55 PM »

What is still unclear why the first 11А511У-ПВБ carried Kosmos-1545 in 1984, but the 11А511У remained in service until 2004

11А511У-ПВБ rockets were tested in 1984-1985. After that all produced 11А511У rockets were upgraded to ПВБ version. Your assumption about an using of 11А511У rockets till 2004 is wrong and it is based only on number 685.
Stan Black
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 1287


« Reply #230 on: 06/18/2012 03:38 PM »

What is still unclear why the first 11А511У-ПВБ carried Kosmos-1545 in 1984, but the 11А511У remained in service until 2004

11А511У-ПВБ rockets were tested in 1984-1985. After that all produced 11А511У rockets were upgraded to ПВБ version. Your assumption about an using of 11А511У rockets till 2004 is wrong and it is based only on number 685.

Андрей,
 Your assumptions about my assumptions are totally wrong. Be very careful with language; your tone comes across as quite inflammatory.

 Even if all Soyuz-U were manufactured to ПВБ specifications why maintain two distinct sequences? From the picture Nicolas found for Kosmos-2000 the rocket featured an 11С510; no mention of ПВБ.

 Conversely the 11С529-ПВБ fairing is fire-explosion-proof; what possible modifications were made to that?

 And if it was to do with payload; why did the sequence come to an end and now all Progress-M are launched by rockets in the ПВБ sequence?
anik
NSF Russian and ISS Admin
Global Moderator
*****
Offline

Posts: 6460
Location: Moscow, Russia



WWW
« Reply #231 on: 06/18/2012 03:55 PM »

Your assumptions about my assumptions are totally wrong. Be very careful with language; your tone comes across as quite inflammatory

Okay, I will be silent for not to be quite inflammatory.
Stan Black
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 1287


« Reply #232 on: 06/24/2012 02:39 PM »

 Thanks to Rui two new rockets in the ПВБ sequence identified: #082 for Foton №12 and #045 for Resurs-F1M.

http://www.zenite.nu/orbita/
Edição 125



 The Soyuz-U was introduced in 1973. It is referenced by index 11А511У. Each of the various components also have separate indices: 11С59 covers the 1st & 2nd stage cluster - blok A, B, V, G and D, 11С510 for the 3rd stage - blok I. These are allocated a serial number. The numbers appear to be allocated per order, not always aligned to the factory machine-series number.
 I am not suggesting the design remained static, just there is an apparent continuos series.
 The combination of 11С59 and 11С510 continued until 2004 with Soyuz-U №685.

 Following an accident in 1980 a new version was introduced; ПВБ for пожаровзрывобезопасная.
 There is a separate series of Soyuz-U featuring 11С59-ПВБ and 11С510-ПВБ. The modifications did not just affect the rocket, but the fairing such as 11С529-ПВБ and also the launch site.

Quote
В 1980-х годах на стартовых комплексах были внедрены мероприятия по повышению пожаровзрывобезопасности под РН 11А511-ПВБ.
Самарские ступени «Семерки» [15,1 MB]

http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/200/33.shtml
http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/239/21.shtml



The 11А511У-ПВБ design too has not remained static and now features КМ-737.
http://arch.svyazexpo-online.ru/news/news.php?id=166
http://asozd.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/(ViewDoc)?OpenAgent&arhiv/a_dz_5.nsf/ByID&65B1201058802BABC32577AF0048FE5B
[3,5 MB]
Nicolas PILLET
Member
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 1408
Location: Gien, France


WWW
« Reply #233 on: 06/26/2012 02:40 PM »

From a Russian source.
Galactic Penguin SST
Geek Penguin on Mt. Olympus
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 2279
Location: Hong Kong



WWW
« Reply #234 on: 06/26/2012 02:45 PM »

From a Russian source.

This should also be posted in the Plesetsk cosmodrome thread, as it records the total number of R-7 launches from there: a whooping 939 launches (all but 2 are aimed for orbit) up till 2011. A slightly off-topic question: if we count both orbital launch attempts and those that reached orbit, is Plesetsk cosmodrome still the most used spaceport in history?
anik
NSF Russian and ISS Admin
Global Moderator
*****
Offline

Posts: 6460
Location: Moscow, Russia



WWW
« Reply #235 on: 06/26/2012 11:20 PM »

From a Russian source

Thanks!

it records the total number of R-7 launches from there: a whooping 939 launches (all but 2 are aimed for orbit) up till 2011

There should be strict definition of launch. I count launches only with liftoff. I have 935 launches of R-7 rockets for that timeframe. In 1997 they count January 10 event (no liftoff), in 1980 - March 18 event (no liftoff), in 1978 - two unknown (for me) events, in 1973 - one unknown (for me) event, in 1967 they have forgotten to count R-7A launch on July 25.

if we count both orbital launch attempts and those that reached orbit, is Plesetsk cosmodrome still the most used spaceport in history?

Up to now, 1583 rockets were launched with aim to reach orbit.
Nicolas PILLET
Member
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 1408
Location: Gien, France


WWW
« Reply #236 on: 07/02/2012 12:17 PM »

Dear friends,

I attach one of the most wonderful documents I've ever seen.
Thank you very very much to the source.
I hadn't had the time yet to analyse this so big amount of data...
Satori
Moderator
Global Moderator
*****
Offline

Posts: 9067
Location: Braga - Portugal



WWW
« Reply #237 on: 07/02/2012 12:32 PM »

Dear friends,

I attach one of the most wonderful documents I've ever seen.
Thank you very very much to the source.
I hadn't had the time yet to analyse this so big amount of data...

Amazing document! Thanks for sharing! This will keep us occupied for many days!
anik
NSF Russian and ISS Admin
Global Moderator
*****
Offline

Posts: 6460
Location: Moscow, Russia



WWW
« Reply #238 on: 07/02/2012 01:01 PM »

Nicolas, thanks to you and to your source! Wonderful document! :o
Galactic Penguin SST
Geek Penguin on Mt. Olympus
Full Member
*****
Offline

Posts: 2279
Location: Hong Kong



WWW
« Reply #239 on: 07/02/2012 01:13 PM »

Dear friends,

I attach one of the most wonderful documents I've ever seen.
Thank you very very much to the source.
I hadn't had the time yet to analyse this so big amount of data...

Wow thanks! I wonder if your source have a similar document for Baikonur launches?

For the likes of Johnathan and Ed, here are the stated reasons for Plesetsk R-7 launch failures (or at least from Google translation...  :P):

1. 1966-05-17 [Voskhod 11A57] (Zenit-4): Failure at T+ 96s due to a "gearbox" (?) failure of the D429-500 unit on block G.
2. 1967-06-20 [Voskhod 11A57] (Zenit-4): Block D's telemetry cable failed to separate at booster separation, causing it to collide with the core stage (block A) and rupturing its kerosene tank.
3. 1967-09-01  [Voskhod 11A57] (Zenit-2): Block I failure at T+295 seconds (something about a valve that did not close?)
4. 1968-01-16 [Voskhod 11A57] (Kosmos 199): Spacecraft failed to separate due to an electrical failure.
5a. 1969-01-06 [Vostok-2M 8A92M] (Meteor): Launch aborted 9.65 seconds after ignition command due to a rupture of valve "O" on block B.
5. 1969-02-01 [Vostok-2M 8A92M] (Meteor): Second stage failure at T+ 258.4 seconds.
6a. 1970-02-26 [Vostok-2M 8A92M] (Meteor-1-3): Block A aft compartment caught fire before launch. Rocket rolled back to HIF.
7. 1970-07-21 [Voskhod 11A57] (Zenit-4): Block A control failure at T+146 seconds due to on-board gyroscope cavity pressure drop (?).
8. 1971-03-05 [Voskhod 11A57] (Zenit-2M): On-board internal battery (model 21STSK-50) failure at T+120 seconds.
9. 1971-06-25 [Voskhod 11A57] (Zenit-2M): Failure at T+95 seconds after block B's thrust dropped for 93 seconds resulting from voltage drop of internal battery (model 21STSK-25).
10. 1971-12-03 [Voskhod 11A57] (Zenit-2M): Block A exploded at T+ 0.5 seconds due to foreign matter blocking the engine.
11. 1972-09-02 [Voskhod 11A57] (Zenit-4M): Failure at T+ 85 seconds due to block A's vernier support structure A7200-10 failing, causing 2 verniers to wildly oscillate.
12a. 1973-04-06 [Voskhod 11A57] (Kosmos 554): Launch aborted at preliminary ignition stage due to one valve of block A's engine not opening.
13. 1973-07-04 [Voskhod 11A57] (Zenit-4M): Block A's programming tape recorder short-circuited in flight, leading to incorrect pitch setting.
14. 1974-05-23 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Yantar-2K): Failure at T+ 440 seconds due to block A not separating from block I (release lock A3120-0/8K75 failure).
15. 1974-08-30 [Voskhod 11A57] (Zenit-2M): Block A failure at T+249 seconds due to premature cutoff of hydrogen peroxide (product 0-30) supply.
16. 1976-07-01 [Molniya-M 8K78M] (Kosmos 837): Block ML upper stage failure left spacecraft in wrong orbit.
17. 1976-09-01 [Molniya-M 8K78M] (Kosmos 853): Block ML upper stage did not start due to failure of separating valve "O" (?).
18. 1976-10-04 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Zenit-4MKT): Block D prematurely separated at T+94 seconds due to connecting screw failure between block D and block A.
19a. 1978-11-03 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Zenit-4MKM): Block D engine started late due to control failure, led to abort at intermediate thrust level.
20. 1979-02-16 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Zenit-2M): Third stage controller failure (of electrical relay KD24) at T+290 seconds lead to engine valve "G" not opened completely.
21. 1979-10-12 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Zenit-6): Third stage lost thrust after oxygen tank pressurization system failure.
22. 1980-02-12 [Molniya-M 8K78M] (Kosmos 1164): Block BL's control moment gyroscope (model KI11-24-14) failed in flight, lead to incorrect orbit.
23a. 1980-03-18 [Vostok-2M 8A92M] (Tselina-D): Vehicle exploded on pad during hydrogen peroxide fueling, killing 48 people.
24. 1980-04-18 [Molniya-M 8K78M] (Kosmos 1175): Fourth stage failed to ignite after oxygen valve 0657-OA failed.
25a. 1980-04-25 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Zenit-4MT): Launch aborted at 12.5 seconds (can someone translate the reasons?)
26. 1981-09-11 [Molniya-M 8K78M] (Kosmos 1305): Fourth stage failed at T+3367 seconds due to engine explosion.
27. 1982-05-15 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Zenit-6): Block A shut down at T+28.26 seconds due to false shutdown command caused by the control circuit board contaminated with metal particles.
28. 1986-10-03 [Molniya-M 8K78M] (Kosmos 1783): Upper stage shutdown at T+3819 seconds due to a faulty transducer.
29. 1987-06-18 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Resurs-F1): Block D's oxygen turbopump exploded at T+6.31 seconds, probably due to foreign objects inside the pump.
30. 1988-07-27 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Resurs-F1): Control systems failure of the first stage at T+1.43 seconds. (Can someone help translate the details?)
31. 1990-04-03 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Yantar-4K2): Third stage failure at T+358 seconds due to control failure (?).
32. 1990-06-21 [Molniya-M 8K78M] (Kosmos 2084): Fourth stage pitch control failure due to power transformer short circuit.
33. 1990-07-03 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Yantar-4K2): Failure at T+123 seconds due to control system damage at booster staging, leading to loss of vernier control.
34. 1996-06-20 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Yantar-4K1): Payload fairing disintegrated at T+49 seconds, causing destruction of blocks B and D.
35. 2002-10-15 [Soyuz-U 11A511U] (Foton-M1): Block D pump explosion at T+20 seconds due to ingestion of foreign particles.
36. 2005-06-21 [Molniya-M 8K78M] (Molniya-3K): Block A failure at T+298.6 seconds due to valve leaking for 26 seconds caused by oscillations.
37. 2011-12-23 [Soyuz-2-1b 14A14B] (Meridian 5): Third stage failure at T+421 seconds due to helium pressurization system leakage.
Tags:
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 24 Next
 

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 3.1 Public | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC
All content © 2005-2011 NASASpaceFlight.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.125 seconds with 23 queries.