Author Topic: Orbital's Antares Development Update Thread  (Read 751064 times)

Offline arachnitect

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1440
  • Liked: 386
  • Likes Given: 459
Re: Orbital's Antares Development Update Thread
« Reply #1980 on: 08/11/2013 08:56 PM »
Orbital finally got an updated User's Guide for Antares out into the open!  ;D http://www.orbital.com/NewsInfo/Publications/Antares%20UG.pdf

Looks like they've settled on Kodiak over VAFB for west coast ops.

Not likely to happen though.

The lack of any non CRS flights for Antares has me curious whether they're actively selling Antares launches at all.

Offline joek

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2800
  • Liked: 567
  • Likes Given: 337
Re: Orbital's Antares Development Update Thread
« Reply #1981 on: 08/11/2013 09:06 PM »
The lack of any non CRS flights for Antares has me curious whether they're actively selling Antares launches at all.
Other likely non-CRS customer is NASA medium class science missions.  Viability of providers for those types of missions is one reason for the way CRS was structured.  Probably best discussed in a non-update thread.

Online kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8571
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1063
  • Likes Given: 238
Re: Orbital's Antares Development Update Thread
« Reply #1982 on: 08/11/2013 10:14 PM »
Other than, with a significant performance hit, they still can launch SSO out of WFF.

So west coast will only be needed if the payloads they intend to go after are to large for WFF.
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Online kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8571
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1063
  • Likes Given: 238
Re: Orbital's Antares Development Update Thread
« Reply #1983 on: 08/12/2013 01:26 AM »
Since the possibility of a West Coast Antares might generate some traffic, I started a new thread on it with some questions I had.

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=32584.new#new

If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline Antares

  • ABO^2
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5194
  • Done arguing with amateurs
  • Liked: 345
  • Likes Given: 223
Re: Orbital's Antares Development Update Thread
« Reply #1984 on: 08/12/2013 04:47 PM »
There's still the question of whether the Range would approve the Caribbean and Central American overflights needed for SSO out of Wallops.
If I like something on NSF, it's probably because I know it to be accurate.  Every once in a while, it's just something I agree with.  Facts generally receive the former.

Tags: