What a great read! Lots of info, great images and no BS you get from some other sites.
Quote from: AARON17 on 01/30/2015 01:10 pmWhat a great read! Lots of info, great images and no BS you get from some other sites.You said it brother!
John Elbon, quoted from the article:"I don’t think there is a time in history when there’s been more development of space flight hardware ongoing, or exciting things that are happening"And assuming that he's referring to HUMAN spaceflight...Does the level of activity today with Orion, Dragon 2, and CST-100 beat the 1960's?Was there development overlap of Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo? If so, how much?Or Gemini, Apollo, and MOL?Or Apollo, Apollo Applications/Skylab, and MOL?Hyperbole or no from Mr. Elbon, I'm impressed with this Boeing product thus far.Thank you for the informative article, Chris, and the impressive illustrations, okan170!Dare I say, that NSF articles today match the quality of Aviation Week & Space Technology in its prime?I dare!Sincerely,Zubenelgenubi
Quote from: zubenelgenubi on 01/30/2015 03:54 pmDare I say, that NSF articles today match the quality of Aviation Week & Space Technology in its prime?I dare!Sincerely,Zubenelgenubi2) Heh - no. I run this site from a desk in my front room, when I'm home and not doing my day job(s) - and I write probably no more than for a few hours late at night. Aviation Week and such as in offices and with full time, very experienced, writers.
Dare I say, that NSF articles today match the quality of Aviation Week & Space Technology in its prime?I dare!Sincerely,Zubenelgenubi