Author Topic: Robotics Mission Section  (Read 26221 times)

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 30785
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 9024
  • Likes Given: 292
Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #20 on: 08/11/2011 12:58 PM »
Totally disagree. Should stay as it is. Nothing "robotic" about most of the items spacecraft covered.

An unmanned spacecraft is robotic

Offline Gene DiGennaro

  • Armchair Astronaut
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 630
  • Baltimore, Md
    • Glenn L. Martin Maryland Aviation Museum
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 15
Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #21 on: 08/11/2011 01:06 PM »
The old chauvinistic 1960s dinosaur (Dyna Soar?) in me likes the term unmanned spacecraft but we must live in the modern times...I'm okay with robotic I suppose.

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10658
  • Liked: 2201
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #22 on: 08/11/2011 04:44 PM »
The other part of the title is just as wrong as "unmanned."

Scrolling down the first page of titles, I see references to Terra and WISE. Neither of those spacecraft is a "flagship" or an "interplanetary spacecraft."

And mixing flagship and interplanetary spacecraft is like labeling something "apples and fruits" because a flagship is an interplanetary spacecraft just like an apple is a fruit.

Actually, thinking about it some more, it is even less accurate. You can have flagship missions in all four of NASA's space science mission categories. Hubble is a flagship mission. But what about non-flagship, non-interplanetary spacecraft, like WISE and Terra?

That's why I think the most accurate title is: Robotic Spacecraft (Astronomy, Planetary, Earth Science, and Solar/Heliophysics)

That covers all the categories adequately.

Offline Rabidpanda

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 418
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 32
  • Likes Given: 559
Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #23 on: 08/14/2011 01:34 AM »
I agree with Blackstar, the name is a little confusing.
Julian

Offline Nomadd

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Boca Chica, Texas
  • Liked: 2788
  • Likes Given: 190
Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #24 on: 08/14/2011 02:23 AM »
 As long as we're giving Chris unsolicited advice, how about at least keeping it simple. You can't include every possible category of non commercial spacecraft in the title.
 Hell, even commercial might go BEO and belong.
 Maybe just "Unmanned science"

Offline Lee Jay

  • Elite Veteran
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6578
  • Liked: 863
  • Likes Given: 132
Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #25 on: 08/14/2011 02:44 AM »
As long as we're giving Chris unsolicited advice, how about at least keeping it simple. You can't include every possible category of non commercial spacecraft in the title.
 Hell, even commercial might go BEO and belong.
 Maybe just "Unmanned science"

My suggestion was unmanned (or uncrewed, or robotic) science missions.

Offline MarsInMyLifetime

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 278
  • Austin, TX
    • Light of Day
  • Liked: 131
  • Likes Given: 137
Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #26 on: 08/14/2011 03:06 AM »
Considering the semantics, "unmanned" says what it is not, whereas "robotic" says what it is. So I am more keen on Robotic Exploration, which speaks for Voyagers as well as for future planetary and deep space missions, and for the technology as well as the science.
Don

Online Chris Bergin

Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #27 on: 08/15/2011 04:58 PM »
I wish people knew how easy it would be to send me a message ;D

We'll change it, but I need the following:

Section Header: (Replacing: Unmanned Missions (Flagship and Interplanetary Spacecraft))

Sub Section Header: (Replacing: Interplanetary Spacecraft and Flagship Unmanned Mission Coverage).

Note both replacements need to be a similar length due to space restrction.

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8408
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 987
  • Likes Given: 227
Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #28 on: 08/17/2011 01:01 PM »
So since the Juno launch thread is closed, when will we see a Juno Mission thread?

Just curious...
Sharknado 5: Global Swarming
Make America Bait Again!

Offline Drkskywxlt

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 152
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #29 on: 08/17/2011 01:07 PM »
Fantastic addition!  Kudos!

Online Chris Bergin

Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #30 on: 08/17/2011 02:36 PM »
So since the Juno launch thread is closed, when will we see a Juno Mission thread?

Just curious...

You mean like this one half way down the page? :D

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=26357.0

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8408
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 987
  • Likes Given: 227
Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #31 on: 08/17/2011 03:07 PM »
So since the Juno launch thread is closed, when will we see a Juno Mission thread?

Just curious...

You mean like this one half way down the page? :D

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=26357.0

DOH!
Sharknado 5: Global Swarming
Make America Bait Again!

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10658
  • Liked: 2201
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #32 on: 08/18/2011 09:28 PM »
I wish people knew how easy it would be to send me a message ;D

We'll change it, but I need the following:

Section Header: (Replacing: Unmanned Missions (Flagship and Interplanetary Spacecraft))

Sub Section Header: (Replacing: Interplanetary Spacecraft and Flagship Unmanned Mission Coverage).

Note both replacements need to be a similar length due to space restrction.

Well, discussing it here helped establish a consensus, which I think is a good thing before making changes.

I sent you a message. It suggests the section header should be robotic spacecraft, with four sub section headers for astronomy, planetary, Earth and heliophysics. This matches perfectly with how NASA categorizes the space sciences. There is certainly a little overlap on the margins, but it's a pretty good categorization.
« Last Edit: 08/18/2011 09:29 PM by Blackstar »

Offline edfishel

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 150
  • Liked: 19
  • Likes Given: 66
Re: Unmanned Mission Section
« Reply #33 on: 08/18/2011 09:33 PM »
I like describing what it is...as opposed to what it isn't.
Either way, Chris. Thanks so much for adding this to our rich mix on NSF. :)

Online Chris Bergin

Re: Robotic Mission Section
« Reply #34 on: 08/19/2011 12:18 AM »

We'll change it, but I need the following:

Section Header: (Replacing: Unmanned Missions (Flagship and Interplanetary Spacecraft))

Sub Section Header: (Replacing: Interplanetary Spacecraft and Flagship Unmanned Mission Coverage).

Note both replacements need to be a similar length due to space restrction.

And the title changes are complete.

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8408
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 987
  • Likes Given: 227
Re: Robotics Mission Section
« Reply #35 on: 08/19/2011 01:38 PM »
But I don't see minor planets in the title ;)
Sharknado 5: Global Swarming
Make America Bait Again!

Offline phred

  • Member
  • Posts: 91
  • Liked: 5
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Robotics Mission Section
« Reply #36 on: 12/12/2011 01:04 PM »
New section, which will be launched properly via a feature article on the Voyagers to allow for update coverage via the forum.

Dawn and company will be moved into here, as will Juno for its mission post S/C sep.

If you notice any other threads relevant to this section, please report the thread so we can move it into here.

Could this section contain threads on missions that are under study?  For example, I'm really interested in the International Lunar Network and many space astronomy mission studies.


Offline vjkane

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 509
  • Liked: 76
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Robotics Mission Section
« Reply #38 on: 10/13/2013 04:28 AM »


Could this section contain threads on missions that are under study?  For example, I'm really interested in the International Lunar Network and many space astronomy mission studies.
[/quote]
I would certainly contribute.  I no longer have time to post on my Future Planets blog as much as I did in the past, but I could do a lot of quick updates here.

Tags: