While I'm pretty impressed by all those articles, perhaps it's a good idea to tone down the statistics a bit? Nothing wrong with the latest article, but the others were slightly info-heavy!
Quote from: Skylab on 08/12/2011 11:16 pmWhile I'm pretty impressed by all those articles, perhaps it's a good idea to tone down the statistics a bit? Nothing wrong with the latest article, but the others were slightly info-heavy! You can never be too info-heavy, IMO - that's one of the reasons why I love this site.
Bump for the NROL references in the NROL-38 overview article.http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/06/live-ula-atlas-v-50th-eelv-launch-nrol-38/Got to say, I've seen members of this site fall over themselves to link up and post high praise for articles on other sites that are about 100 words in length and look like they took 10 minutes to write, yet these massive Chris G feature articles - while they have six figure readership figures - have frak all comments on this thread?WTF is going on with that? I'm not even being funny, some people need to have a word with themselves.
The forum is. There's always a thread, in the section linked by the article, specific to the article.We'll never have those horrendous "Facebook" comment areas in the articles themselves.
Quote from: Chris Bergin on 06/28/2012 11:43 amThe forum is. There's always a thread, in the section linked by the article, specific to the article.We'll never have those horrendous "Facebook" comment areas in the articles themselves. You really do need a "Read what people are saying about this story..." link at the bottom of every article that directs to the appropriate thread of the forum.
Thank you Chris for writing this. I really enjoyed reading all these articles. These articles have brought back memories as well as taught me new things.