Forums
L2 Sign Up
SLS/Orion
SpaceX
Commercial
ISS
International
Other
Shop
Home
Help
Tags
Calendar
Login
Register
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Advanced Concepts
»
Possibly a better way to make RCC parts?
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Possibly a better way to make RCC parts? (Read 831 times)
john smith 19
Senior Member
Posts: 10346
Everyplaceelse
Liked: 2426
Likes Given: 13596
Possibly a better way to make RCC parts?
«
on:
04/08/2016 07:52 pm »
I'm not sure if this has been suggested before.
Looking at the leading edges of the Shuttle I was struck by how these parts seemed to laid up by hand. Hand layup is not necessarily bad but it does mean the parts are
critically
dependent on the skills of the team doing the layup.
This seems to be a special problem for hollow, open section parts
What I had in mind is to treat such parts as 2 halves of a common cylindrical shape. This would allow the part to be made on filament winding or pultrusion machines (these can wind parts several metres across) then splitting the part using water jet or physical cutters to preserve the thermal properties into several sections, both long ways and into segments.
This means the part can now leverage the consistency and repeatability of such machines.
I thought of this approach before I saw the actual Shuttle leading edge parts and how each has an end cap. Obviously that would not be incorporated in this approach. The question becomes could a new design avoid using end caps.
I don't know if this is not already SOP in the industry but it seems like a good way to lower the cost of certain types of parts made in RCC.
Logged
MCT
ITS
BFR
SS. The worlds first Methane fueled FFSC engined
CFRP
SS structure A380 sized aerospaceplane tail sitter capable of Earth & Mars atmospheric flight.First flight to Mars
by end of 2022
TBC. T&C apply. Trust nothing. Run your own #s "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" R. Simberg."Competitve" means cheap
er
¬cheap SCramjet proposed 1956. First +ve thrust 2004. US R&D spend to date > $10Bn. #deployed designs. Zero.
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Tags:
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Advanced Concepts
»
Possibly a better way to make RCC parts?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Tweets by NASASpaceflight
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
0