Here are the slides of the NAC meeting:https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/nac_ccp_status_march_28_20171.pdfhttps://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/nac-heoc
Can someone explain the schedule risks? I don't understand what those mean. Is one for Boeing and one for Spacex for starters?
Quote from: rockets4life97 on 03/29/2017 11:38 pmCan someone explain the schedule risks? I don't understand what those mean. Is one for Boeing and one for Spacex for starters?If you are referring to slides 6-7, the number in the matrix on the right side is the count of items in the table on the left side with that Likelihood and Consequence (LxC in the table on the left).
Quote from: joek on 03/30/2017 12:20 amQuote from: rockets4life97 on 03/29/2017 11:38 pmCan someone explain the schedule risks? I don't understand what those mean. Is one for Boeing and one for Spacex for starters?If you are referring to slides 6-7, the number in the matrix on the right side is the count of items in the table on the left side with that Likelihood and Consequence (LxC in the table on the left).Thanks, yes those are the slides I was referring to. I understand the table. What I don't understand is the actual items.
They are 2 matrices that are showing Program risks. In this case, "Program" means NASA's Commercial Crew Program (CCP), not specifically either of the partner programs (i.e. not vehicle specific). The first matrix shows overall Programmatic risks, and includes considerations of cost and schedule. The second matrix is just for health/safety issues.
Ammonia Emergency Response: Is this for a capsule on the pad or in space or both or what?
Quote from: deruch on 03/30/2017 08:00 amThey are 2 matrices that are showing Program risks. In this case, "Program" means NASA's Commercial Crew Program (CCP), not specifically either of the partner programs (i.e. not vehicle specific). The first matrix shows overall Programmatic risks, and includes considerations of cost and schedule. The second matrix is just for health/safety issues.Okay. So, could these end up affecting the providers? I'm interested in more info, if some has it. Maybe these have been discussed elsewhere?Requirement changes: sounds like it could be new work? Do we know more about this?DoD Search and Rescue (Posture & Training Schedule): I imagine this is the Coast Guard/Navy's ability to go get a capsule for an emergency/off-nominal? Ability to close LOC (Loss of Crew?) Gap: How big is this gap and what are the strategies for closing it?Ammonia Emergency Response: Is this for a capsule on the pad or in space or both or what?
The 2017 AST Compendium has some interesting data.USCV 1 and 3 are shown as Falcon 9 and USCV 2 and 4 as Atlas V.From 2019, there are three SpaceX, one OA and one SNC cargo missions per year.For CRS2, SpaceX is getting $900M for six missions ($150M each) and OA is getting $1,400M for six missions ($233M each). At the above flight rates, that covers two years for SpaceX and six years for OA. Cost data is not given for SNC.
The 2017 AST Compendium has some interesting data...
https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2017/07/20/nasas-commercial-crew-program-target-flight-dates/QuoteTargeted Test Flight Dates:Boeing Orbital Flight Test: June 2018Boeing Crew Flight Test: August 2018SpaceX Demonstration Mission 1: February 2018SpaceX Demonstration Mission 2 (crewed): June 2018
Targeted Test Flight Dates:Boeing Orbital Flight Test: June 2018Boeing Crew Flight Test: August 2018SpaceX Demonstration Mission 1: February 2018SpaceX Demonstration Mission 2 (crewed): June 2018