Doesn't that show the use of less than the ultimate care is construction of the cavity?
In other words they built the cavity first then tried to figure out how to excite it.
What good does it do to try and sell an electric SSTO space plane and interstellar probes, when they haven't even put together a tabletop demonstration whose effect is visible without high sensitivity instrumentation?
Terminal velocity = 204,429 km/s = 0.68 cEven if you can get to 68% of the speed of light, how do you slow down at that point?
This is something where JohnFornaro and AutoCAD could really help ...
Quote from: RotoSequence on 10/20/2014 11:13 pmWhat good does it do to try and sell an electric SSTO space plane and interstellar probes, when they haven't even put together a tabletop demonstration whose effect is visible without high sensitivity instrumentation?The *good* it does is to point out how game changing a positive result would be.Hence a bit more funding. Hence we can get a bit closer to the *truth*
Quote from: Rodal on 10/19/2014 05:01 pmThis is something where JohnFornaro and AutoCAD could really help ...I just plopped "AnomalousThrustProductionFromanRFTestDevice-BradyEtAl.jpg"into ACAD, and arbitrarily scaled it. Nobody's given me a wide end dimension, so, for the purposes of discussion, I just scaled it to your *cough* typical EM-Drive diameter *cough* of 28 cm.Interesting similarities in the proportions.Got any more where that came from?
Quote from: IslandPlaya on 10/20/2014 11:47 pmQuote from: RotoSequence on 10/20/2014 11:13 pmWhat good does it do to try and sell an electric SSTO space plane and interstellar probes, when they haven't even put together a tabletop demonstration whose effect is visible without high sensitivity instrumentation?The *good* it does is to point out how game changing a positive result would be.Hence a bit more funding. Hence we can get a bit closer to the *truth*Unfortunately, however, they are selling sizzle before they have a steak.
Quote from: JohnFornaro on 10/21/2014 12:35 amQuote from: Rodal on 10/19/2014 05:01 pmThis is something where JohnFornaro and AutoCAD could really help ...I just plopped "AnomalousThrustProductionFromanRFTestDevice-BradyEtAl.jpg"into ACAD, and arbitrarily scaled it. Nobody's given me a wide end dimension, so, for the purposes of discussion, I just scaled it to your *cough* typical EM-Drive diameter *cough* of 28 cm.Interesting similarities in the proportions.Got any more where that came from?Thank you!Very professional job. We even got pdf's for everybody to look at!And everything in metric units as well !Now, would it be too much to ask to also get cheese with the excellent wine?We know that the (Faztek) beam (at the bottom of the picture, shown in cross-section) has a square cross section of 1.5 inch by 1.5 inchKnowing that, what are the dimensions?
Here's the "small" shawyer device. Correct my titles.
Bitch and moan. All I ever hear around here.