Author Topic: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing  (Read 18618 times)

Online Chris Bergin

A bit more to this than just the Plum Brook element. ATV/Orion deal and the use of a Shuttle flown OME, etc.

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2015/06/plum-brook-orion-service-module-testing/

And some lovely Okan Renders from L2 :)
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline rayleighscatter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1098
  • Maryland
  • Liked: 565
  • Likes Given: 238
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #1 on: 06/20/2015 04:56 pm »
Was the ESA given the whole OMS pod, or just the engine from it?

Online Chris Bergin

Was the ESA given the whole OMS pod, or just the engine from it?

Probably all the hardware (engine and tanks). They won't need the TPS on it.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Endeavour_01

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 694
  • Hazards & Risk Analyst in SC, USA
  • Liked: 759
  • Likes Given: 580
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #3 on: 06/20/2015 11:27 pm »
Another excellent article Chris!  :)

Quote
NASA has now confirmed it has provided ESA one of the OMS pods from the Shuttle era, which sports an engine that had previously flew on 19 space shuttle missions and performed 89 burns.

It will be really cool to see an OMS engine in space again. I am curious what this means for the future of the Orion SM. If I read the article correctly work has been terminated on new OMS engines and there are only 4 pods left. What are the plans for the SM once the supply of OMS pods has been depleted?
I cheer for both NASA and commercial space. For SLS, Orion, Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, Dragon, Starship/SH, Starliner, Cygnus and all the rest!
I was blessed to see the launch of Space Shuttle Endeavour on STS-99. The launch was beyond amazing. My 8-year old mind was blown. I remember the noise and seeing the exhaust pour out of the shuttle as it lifted off. I remember staring and watching it soar while it was visible in the clear blue sky. It was one of the greatest moments of my life and I will never forget it.

Offline Rocket Science

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10586
  • NASA Educator Astronaut Candidate Applicant 2002
  • Liked: 4548
  • Likes Given: 13523
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #4 on: 06/21/2015 12:28 am »
Thanks for the update on Orion Chris! :)  With all the other noise going on it seems to get unfortunately forgotten.  The ship needs a actual mission sooner rather than later...
"The laws of physics are unforgiving"
~Rob: Physics instructor, Aviator

Online redliox

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2539
  • Illinois USA
  • Liked: 683
  • Likes Given: 97
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #5 on: 06/21/2015 06:39 am »
Surprised to hear about a whole shuttle pod being given.  It seems NASA was being more literal than expected about reusing space shuttle technology; good for a short fix.  And, obviously, letting ESA look over the whole system the Orion's future engine is tied to would help them accommodate their ATV knowledge with older STS setups.

Although not 100% perfect for this topic, I can't help but wonder will NASA eventually build totally new engines for both Orion and SLS?  There are only so many STS leftovers in storage after all, and the supply for SSME is just enough for 4 or 5 SLSs for example.  Again not specific to Orion alone, but I just wonder about the need for fresh engines eventually.
"Let the trails lead where they may, I will follow."
-Tigatron

Offline jtrame

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 309
  • W4FJT
  • Knoxville, TN
  • Liked: 86
  • Likes Given: 346
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #6 on: 06/21/2015 01:17 pm »
Surprised to hear about a whole shuttle pod being given.  It seems NASA was being more literal than expected about reusing space shuttle technology; good for a short fix.  And, obviously, letting ESA look over the whole system the Orion's future engine is tied to would help them accommodate their ATV knowledge with older STS setups.

Although not 100% perfect for this topic, I can't help but wonder will NASA eventually build totally new engines for both Orion and SLS?  There are only so many STS leftovers in storage after all, and the supply for SSME is just enough for 4 or 5 SLSs for example.  Again not specific to Orion alone, but I just wonder about the need for fresh engines eventually.

Chris' June 12 article reports Aerojet-Rocketdyne has received an order for several additional RS-25's (six according to to Aviation Week & Space Technology).

Offline Ronpur50

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2117
  • Brandon, FL
  • Liked: 1028
  • Likes Given: 1884
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #7 on: 06/22/2015 01:13 pm »
Great article!  I can't wait to see the SM arrive for testing.  So, the former OMS engine will only be used for an abort?  And not for any propulsion during the flight?  I have read several times about it's abort function, but I am unclear on what, if any, function it has beyond that.

Offline newpylong

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1499
  • Liked: 200
  • Likes Given: 343
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #8 on: 06/22/2015 02:47 pm »
The OMS main engine will be used for injection burns just the Apollo SM SPS. One improvement is the SM auxiliary thrusters if fired together will be able to provide a backup capability to the main engine.

Once they run out of OMS they will seek to acquire a new but similar engine. The original LM SM was to have a slightly upgraded version.
« Last Edit: 06/22/2015 02:48 pm by newpylong »

Offline Nibb31

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 311
  • France
  • Liked: 177
  • Likes Given: 11
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #9 on: 06/22/2015 04:49 pm »
The OMS main engine will be used for injection burns just the Apollo SM SPS. One improvement is the SM auxiliary thrusters if fired together will be able to provide a backup capability to the main engine.

Didn't Apollo's quad RCS system provide the same function?

Orion has a main propulsion system, an auxiliary propulsion as backup, and the RCS as a backup for the backup, but all of those engines are fed by the same tanks connected in series.

What is the point of all that redundancy in the engines, when there isn't the same redundancy on the tankage and propellant lines? If one tank has a problem, then all those engines are dead. And in the end, if the RCS system fails, you won't be able to orient the spacecraft to do any sort of burn, so why add the extra weight of the Auxiliary thruster system?
« Last Edit: 06/22/2015 04:50 pm by Nibb31 »

Online redliox

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2539
  • Illinois USA
  • Liked: 683
  • Likes Given: 97
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #10 on: 06/22/2015 07:02 pm »
Once they run out of OMS they will seek to acquire a new but similar engine. The original LM SM was to have a slightly upgraded version.

I asked the same earlier, but now that I think about it frankly they need to design a whole new SM when the opportunity arises.  I say that because, when I did calculations for Mars missions using Orion, the Orion's SM is too weak to offer much assist.  The 1.4 km/s it provides in delta-v is just sufficient for Cislunar missions, but hardly enough to tackle a one-way trip to Mars not to mention the six+ months to get there would heavily tax its life support.

Orion could perform a lunar mission or shuttling service to Martian craft, but until they beef up the SM considerably I know the talk of "Orion taking us to Mars" is spoken by somebody with fingers crossed behind their back.
« Last Edit: 06/22/2015 07:02 pm by redliox »
"Let the trails lead where they may, I will follow."
-Tigatron

Offline Endeavour_01

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 694
  • Hazards & Risk Analyst in SC, USA
  • Liked: 759
  • Likes Given: 580
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #11 on: 06/22/2015 11:24 pm »

I asked the same earlier, but now that I think about it frankly they need to design a whole new SM when the opportunity arises.  I say that because, when I did calculations for Mars missions using Orion, the Orion's SM is too weak to offer much assist.  The 1.4 km/s it provides in delta-v is just sufficient for Cislunar missions, but hardly enough to tackle a one-way trip to Mars not to mention the six+ months to get there would heavily tax its life support.

Orion could perform a lunar mission or shuttling service to Martian craft, but until they beef up the SM considerably I know the talk of "Orion taking us to Mars" is spoken by somebody with fingers crossed behind their back.

The Orion SM engine isn't going to be the main engine propelling a Mars craft. There will be some kind of Earth Departure Stage (chemical or SEP) that will accomplish that. One really good thing the SM engine could do is slow Orion down for Earth re-entry. Being able to reduce the re-entry velocity by 1.4 km/s will really help out the heat shield.
I cheer for both NASA and commercial space. For SLS, Orion, Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, Dragon, Starship/SH, Starliner, Cygnus and all the rest!
I was blessed to see the launch of Space Shuttle Endeavour on STS-99. The launch was beyond amazing. My 8-year old mind was blown. I remember the noise and seeing the exhaust pour out of the shuttle as it lifted off. I remember staring and watching it soar while it was visible in the clear blue sky. It was one of the greatest moments of my life and I will never forget it.

Offline the_other_Doug

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3010
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Liked: 2191
  • Likes Given: 4620
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #12 on: 06/23/2015 01:35 am »
How much delta-V do you need from that propulsion system to rendezvous, coming back from Mars, with a platform at, say, L2 or a high lunar orbit?

You'd be talking about maneuvering the Orion/SM and the transit hab (or that part of it you'd like to refurbish and re-use) to a stable platform where samples can be processed (planetary quarantine and all that), where the transit hab can be replenished, refurbished, and generally fixed up, etc.

You'd need enough delta-V left to drop the Orion back towards Earth from your high platform when you're ready to come all the way home, of course.  But this way, the only piece of the entire returning transit stack you lose is the Orion SM.

I can imagine that you might shed some disposable pieces of mass before you started maneuvering to get to your high platform, though.  Something like storage modules that are empty of consumables but are now full of trash -- those might be disposed of into trajectories that will let them burn up harmlessly, or maybe even impact the Moon.  Just waste disposal, at that point.  That's why I say that you would only have to maneuver the part of your transit hab that you'll want to re-use.
-Doug  (With my shield, not yet upon it)

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39215
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 32735
  • Likes Given: 8178
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #13 on: 06/23/2015 05:00 am »
I don't think Orion can do 1.4 km/s anymore. From

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/fs-2014-08-004-jsc-orion_quickfacts-web.pdf
http://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/leag2014/presentations/klaus.pdf

the CM mass is 10,387 kg and the SM inert mass is 6,858 kg with 8,602 kg of propellant. The OMS engine has an Isp of 313 s according to the June 1988 STS Reference manual. The online version of this does not have the image showing the Isp value. The R-4D with 164:1 expansion auxiliary thrusters have an Isp of 311 s according to

http://www.rocket.com/files/aerojet/documents/Capabilities/PDFs/Bipropellant%20Data%20Sheets.pdf
http://www.rocket.com/orion-service-module

Thus, I calculate a delta-V of 313*g*ln(1+8602/(10387+6858)) = 1242 m/s.
« Last Edit: 06/23/2015 05:14 am by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline A_M_Swallow

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8906
  • South coast of England
  • Liked: 500
  • Likes Given: 223
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #14 on: 06/23/2015 06:34 am »
How much delta-V do you need from that propulsion system to rendezvous, coming back from Mars, with a platform at, say, L2 or a high lunar orbit?

You'd be talking about maneuvering the Orion/SM and the transit hab (or that part of it you'd like to refurbish and re-use) to a stable platform where samples can be processed (planetary quarantine and all that), where the transit hab can be replenished, refurbished, and generally fixed up, etc.

You'd need enough delta-V left to drop the Orion back towards Earth from your high platform when you're ready to come all the way home, of course.  But this way, the only piece of the entire returning transit stack you lose is the Orion SM.

{snip}

If the Orion has returned to a lunar/high Earth orbit platform it can be refuelled.

Offline Nibb31

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 311
  • France
  • Liked: 177
  • Likes Given: 11
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #15 on: 06/23/2015 07:25 am »
Does the Orion have refuelling capability?

Offline woods170

  • IRAS fan
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12095
  • IRAS fan
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 18198
  • Likes Given: 12158
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #16 on: 06/23/2015 09:26 am »
Does the Orion have refuelling capability?
You mean in-space refueling capability? The answer to that question is NO.

Offline A_M_Swallow

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8906
  • South coast of England
  • Liked: 500
  • Likes Given: 223
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #17 on: 06/23/2015 09:28 am »
Does the Orion have refuelling capability?
You mean in-space refueling capability? The answer to that question is NO.

That is the current situation. Orion has something like 20 years to gain it.

Online Chris Bergin

Thanks Chaps. Also very cool that a certain astro mentioned it :)
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline woods170

  • IRAS fan
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12095
  • IRAS fan
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 18198
  • Likes Given: 12158
Re: Plum Brook prepped for EM-1 Orion Service Module testing
« Reply #19 on: 06/24/2015 10:04 am »
Does the Orion have refuelling capability?
You mean in-space refueling capability? The answer to that question is NO.

That is the current situation. Orion has something like 20 years to gain it.
Correct, but the original question was asked within the frame-of-reference of the current design of Orion.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1