Author Topic: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)  (Read 3951 times)

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26862
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 6770
  • Likes Given: 4802
So what are these buildings?

They don't look like generic Mars habs. Looks like some thought went into them. The tan buildings look modular, i.e. Flat pack so they fit in the cargo hold efficiently. And there are shields of some sort over the windows that can be opened/tilted up. Maybe some way to get decent radiation shielding?

Thoughts? This is the highest resolution I could find for this image, but the other "Mars SimCity" view used many of the same buildings.

SpaceX must have done some analysis on surface habs and how large ones can efficiently pack into BFR.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26862
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 6770
  • Likes Given: 4802
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #1 on: 10/04/2017 03:18 AM »
Also, by my calculations, the 240 tons of methane to fill the BFS requires 60 tons of hydrogen (540t of water) but some of that has to be electrolyzed again due to the Sabatier process, so if we say 120 tons of hydrogen at 142MJ/kg and 50% electrolysis efficiency, you need about 1 Megawatt of power on average to electrolyze that in 1 Earth year. Considering the 20% capacity factor and being further from the Sun, they need roughly 12 MW (at AM0 sunlight) of solar panels, or about 10 acres (10 football fields), to provide enough juice for one full BFR per Earth year.
« Last Edit: 10/04/2017 03:25 AM by Robotbeat »
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Pipcard

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
  • Liked: 94
  • Likes Given: 92
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #2 on: 10/04/2017 03:53 AM »
So what are these buildings?

They don't look like generic Mars habs. Looks like some thought went into them. The tan buildings look modular, i.e. Flat pack so they fit in the cargo hold efficiently. And there are shields of some sort over the windows that can be opened/tilted up. Maybe some way to get decent radiation shielding?

Thoughts? This is the highest resolution I could find for this image, but the other "Mars SimCity" view used many of the same buildings.

SpaceX must have done some analysis on surface habs and how large ones can efficiently pack into BFR.
Or it could be just a preliminary "for show" design.

Also, there is a Mars mod for SimCity 4 and those images reminded me of that:

Offline Nibb31

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 224
  • France
  • Liked: 135
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #3 on: 10/04/2017 06:02 AM »
Come on, people have got to stop the kremlinology of these CGI models. They are just artist concepts. A lot of fundamental details are missing or shown just as notional concepts. This is not how it's going to look.

Offline guckyfan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6307
  • Germany
  • Liked: 1576
  • Likes Given: 1378
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #4 on: 10/04/2017 08:44 AM »
Come on, people have got to stop the kremlinology of these CGI models. They are just artist concepts. A lot of fundamental details are missing or shown just as notional concepts. This is not how it's going to look.

Except for the geodesic domes. Those are real, according to Elon.

Offline Nibb31

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 224
  • France
  • Liked: 135
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #5 on: 10/04/2017 09:22 AM »
According to Elon, FH should have been flying years ago, Red Dragon would be landing on Mars, and they would be reflying complete Falcon 9 (including upper stages) on a routine basis for less that $10 million.

Offline JamesH65

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 599
  • Liked: 351
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #6 on: 10/04/2017 01:14 PM »
According to Elon, FH should have been flying years ago, Red Dragon would be landing on Mars, and they would be reflying complete Falcon 9 (including upper stages) on a routine basis for less that $10 million.

According to Elon, we will soon have 1st stages returning to Earth, landing safely, maybe even on a barge , and we might even have them launched again! He proposed REUSABLE ROCKETS! Madman.

I hope you get the point.


Offline Nibb31

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 224
  • France
  • Liked: 135
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #7 on: 10/04/2017 01:17 PM »
Did you get mine ?

You shouldn't trust everything that Elon says just because he's Elon.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26862
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 6770
  • Likes Given: 4802
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #8 on: 10/04/2017 01:22 PM »
Did you get mine ?

You shouldn't trust everything that Elon says just because he's Elon.
No one is forcing you on this thread.

We get it. These might be just totally random CGI assets. But they don't look like it, they have what looks like intentional design features made for Mars and that fit with SpaceX's architecture.
« Last Edit: 10/04/2017 08:06 PM by Lar »
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Online KelvinZero

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3464
  • Liked: 453
  • Likes Given: 114
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #9 on: 10/04/2017 01:50 PM »
Re the pics in the OP, I like the photorealistic one more than the SimMars one.

The photorealitic one shows what seem to be some quick prefabs/sheds and a large dome with greenery. (lets not get into how it is anchored right now  ;) )

(by shed I mean something a bit flimsy on the surface that could hold surface equipment. I guess rovers go in some sort of shed for servicing too)

A large part of the area on the surface is that dome containing greenery. This seems natural to me. The prefabs come first, and you would always have something like that on the surface near the ITS. But when you get going there is probably little reason for additional habitable volumes on the surface if they do not provide beautiful views and greenery. Just a few more sheds.

The Mars SimCity picture has those modules I interpret as initial prefabs or sheds, and then it has some more which are not connected above ground.. Implying you either have to get into a suit or there are underground tunnels. There is a low proportion of greenery on the surface.
« Last Edit: 10/04/2017 01:51 PM by KelvinZero »

Offline DreamyPickle

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 103
  • Home
  • Liked: 48
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #10 on: 10/04/2017 02:03 PM »
The base pics are nothing but CGI, all the serious engineering work at SpaceX goes into to the rocket. In particular take a lot at this landing area progression (from reddit):



My bet is most habitats will be mostly underground for radiation protection, it's just that mounds of regolith don't have pretty shiny colors. This doesn't exclude domes, you just need to cover them. Maybe greenhouses or some meeting areas will be exposed.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26862
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 6770
  • Likes Given: 4802
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #11 on: 10/04/2017 02:32 PM »
If it were me, all these things would be under a huge, 2-5psi pressure-stabilized dome (filled initially with just Martian atmosphere with large blowers until it could be well-sealed deep into the ground, which is a challenge) so everything could be built without requiring inflated pressure suits. Perhaps workers at first would wear equivalent of flight suits or something even thinner for safety and warmth but without restricting movement. The actual habs would also be pressurized to, say, 7-12 psi, so you have a more comfortable environment indoors as well as an extra layer of safety.

But this is not my architecture, it's SpaceX's.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26862
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 6770
  • Likes Given: 4802
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #12 on: 10/04/2017 02:36 PM »
It takes 540 tons of water to fill a BFS, so if water is plentiful, it could be used as rad shielding for surface habs. A meter of water on the roof would provide a lot of protection. It could even fill the cells of that beautiful green dome, providing shielding even there. This is made more viable by the low gravity on Mars.

Rad shielding is not critical at first, though.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Nibb31

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 224
  • France
  • Liked: 135
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #13 on: 10/04/2017 02:45 PM »
We get it. These might be just totally random CGI assets. But they don't look like it, they have what looks like intentional design features made for Mars and that fit with SpaceX's architecture.

What makes you think that ? They look like the Mars colony in the opening credits of The Expanse or a mars-themed RTS game. In fact, they look like most of the generic pictures of Mars colonies that we've seen for decades for NASA or science fiction movies or games. Just type "Mars colony" in Google Images and you'll get dozens of very similar designs.

So what makes you think that more thought has been put into this than any other generic "artist's impression" picture ?

Online Darkseraph

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 447
  • Liked: 165
  • Likes Given: 84
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #14 on: 10/04/2017 03:16 PM »
It looks to be a pretty cool but notional depiction of what a future Mars base/ colony could look like with solar arrays, greenhouses, chemical silos, habitats, pads, batteries, comunications and so on. I wouldn't read too much into it beyond being a nice visualization.

SpaceX has stated itself to be a transport company that sells the ride to Mars so I don't expect they will be engaging in large scale civil engineering millions miles away in the next decade. If they're not exactly in a rush to build new faciltiies for BFR/BFS on Earth to make the logistics of that system easier (where it's vastly easier and cheaper to do so), that should give pause to any notions of SpaceX doing so on Mars any time soon. Things like that will probably be done by other companies and governments buying transport from SpaceX in the future.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." R.P.Feynman

Online envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2546
  • Liked: 1133
  • Likes Given: 719
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #15 on: 10/04/2017 04:26 PM »
It looks to be a pretty cool but notional depiction of what a future Mars base/ colony could look like with solar arrays, greenhouses, chemical silos, habitats, pads, batteries, comunications and so on. I wouldn't read too much into it beyond being a nice visualization.

SpaceX has stated itself to be a transport company that sells the ride to Mars so I don't expect they will be engaging in large scale civil engineering millions miles away in the next decade. If they're not exactly in a rush to build new faciltiies for BFR/BFS on Earth to make the logistics of that system easier (where it's vastly easier and cheaper to do so), that should give pause to any notions of SpaceX doing so on Mars any time soon. Things like that will probably be done by other companies and governments buying transport from SpaceX in the future.

SpaceX needs all of those things for ISRU, except maybe greenhouses. And you know Elon wants greenhouses. They will do some work on them, though obviously the scale and the particular implementation shown is mostly notional.

Online envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2546
  • Liked: 1133
  • Likes Given: 719
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #16 on: 10/04/2017 04:31 PM »
If it were me, all these things would be under a huge, 2-5psi pressure-stabilized dome (filled initially with just Martian atmosphere with large blowers until it could be well-sealed deep into the ground, which is a challenge) so everything could be built without requiring inflated pressure suits. Perhaps workers at first would wear equivalent of flight suits or something even thinner for safety and warmth but without restricting movement. The actual habs would also be pressurized to, say, 7-12 psi, so you have a more comfortable environment indoors as well as an extra layer of safety.

But this is not my architecture, it's SpaceX's.

I can't imagine that dome without a sealed floor and vertical tension cables throughout it's area anchored in the ground to hold down the roof. Internal tension elements permit pressurized volumes that aren't complete spheres or domed cylinders.

Online Jdeshetler

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 530
  • Silicon Valley, CA
  • Liked: 1573
  • Likes Given: 1063
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #17 on: 10/04/2017 07:41 PM »
If it were me, all these things would be under a huge, 2-5psi pressure-stabilized dome (filled initially with just Martian atmosphere with large blowers until it could be well-sealed deep into the ground, which is a challenge) so everything could be built without requiring inflated pressure suits. Perhaps workers at first would wear equivalent of flight suits or something even thinner for safety and warmth but without restricting movement. The actual habs would also be pressurized to, say, 7-12 psi, so you have a more comfortable environment indoors as well as an extra layer of safety.

But this is not my architecture, it's SpaceX's.

I can't imagine that dome without a sealed floor and vertical tension cables throughout it's area anchored in the ground to hold down the roof. Internal tension elements permit pressurized volumes that aren't complete spheres or domed cylinders.

Maybe this dome is non-pressured but talcum free environment so they can move around from pressurized containers to others in space suits and their machinery without going thru cleaning processing. Mars talcum powders is salty and abrasive.

Offline Hauerg

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 677
  • Berndorf, Austria
  • Liked: 284
  • Likes Given: 1031
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #18 on: 10/04/2017 07:51 PM »
It looks to be a pretty cool but notional depiction of what a future Mars base/ colony could look like with solar arrays, greenhouses, chemical silos, habitats, pads, batteries, comunications and so on. I wouldn't read too much into it beyond being a nice visualization.

SpaceX has stated itself to be a transport company that sells the ride to Mars so I don't expect they will be engaging in large scale civil engineering millions miles away in the next decade. If they're not exactly in a rush to build new faciltiies for BFR/BFS on Earth to make the logistics of that system easier (where it's vastly easier and cheaper to do so), that should give pause to any notions of SpaceX doing so on Mars any time soon. Things like that will probably be done by other companies and governments buying transport from SpaceX in the future.
Right. Just like EM would just concentrate on electric cars. Not building tunnels ....

So maybe not SpaceX, but XtraBoring.

Online envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2546
  • Liked: 1133
  • Likes Given: 719
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #19 on: 10/04/2017 08:02 PM »
If it were me, all these things would be under a huge, 2-5psi pressure-stabilized dome (filled initially with just Martian atmosphere with large blowers until it could be well-sealed deep into the ground, which is a challenge) so everything could be built without requiring inflated pressure suits. Perhaps workers at first would wear equivalent of flight suits or something even thinner for safety and warmth but without restricting movement. The actual habs would also be pressurized to, say, 7-12 psi, so you have a more comfortable environment indoors as well as an extra layer of safety.

But this is not my architecture, it's SpaceX's.

I can't imagine that dome without a sealed floor and vertical tension cables throughout it's area anchored in the ground to hold down the roof. Internal tension elements permit pressurized volumes that aren't complete spheres or domed cylinders.

Maybe this dome is non-pressured but talcum free environment so they can move around from pressurized containers to others in space suits and their machinery without going thru cleaning processing. Mars talcum powders is salty and abrasive.

For what it's worth, in the picture there is vegetation growing inside. Temperature, pressure, and gas mixture have to be fairly Earth-like.

Offline jebbo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 315
  • Cambridge, UK
  • Liked: 65
  • Likes Given: 58
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #20 on: 10/05/2017 02:30 PM »
Related to this, I wonder about those first few Mars landings when there is NO infrastructure.  Basically, I don't think I've seen anything on the first landings on the bare Martian (or Lunar, if that happens first) surface or how a landing pad structure would be deployed.

Or have I just missed it in the volume of updates? [ which is entirely possible! ]

--- Tony

Offline meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7613
  • N. California
  • Liked: 3934
  • Likes Given: 816
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #21 on: 10/05/2017 07:05 PM »
I'm curious about the large dome.

We never really got to the bottom of how to scale domes. Either that pesky ground seam, or a full buried sphere, neither is straight forward. Like any large pressure vessel.
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Online envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2546
  • Liked: 1133
  • Likes Given: 719
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #22 on: 10/05/2017 07:14 PM »
I'm curious about the large dome.

We never really got to the bottom of how to scale domes. Either that pesky ground seam, or a full buried sphere, neither is straight forward. Like any large pressure vessel.

Either way, the stresses quickly become infeasible without internal tension elements. With internal cables, ground anchors, and a sealed floor, the dome is certainly doable.

Offline meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7613
  • N. California
  • Liked: 3934
  • Likes Given: 816
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #23 on: 10/05/2017 07:21 PM »
I'm curious about the large dome.

We never really got to the bottom of how to scale domes. Either that pesky ground seam, or a full buried sphere, neither is straight forward. Like any large pressure vessel.

Either way, the stresses quickly become infeasible without internal tension elements. With internal cables, ground anchors, and a sealed floor, the dome is certainly doable.
Yeah, I was thinking internal cables too.

But the thing is, the difficulty scales with volume, and so you're not really winning with larger domes.  It's just prettier (from a distance).

I wonder how much engineering They've applied to the colony.  The couple of slides are not an indication one way or the other.

Are they developing a large surface vehicle?  Did they partner with someone on that?  How about solar tech, ISRU tech, agriculture...

Next year's IAC?

ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Online Lar

  • Fan boy at large
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8327
  • Saw Gemini live on TV
  • A large LEGO storage facility ... in Michigan
  • Liked: 5104
  • Likes Given: 3413
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #24 on: 10/05/2017 07:35 PM »
Related to this, I wonder about those first few Mars landings when there is NO infrastructure.  Basically, I don't think I've seen anything on the first landings on the bare Martian (or Lunar, if that happens first) surface or how a landing pad structure would be deployed.

Or have I just missed it in the volume of updates? [ which is entirely possible! ]

--- Tony
A bit off topic. And also discussed in the past, I think. Netting it out:

I think the first automated ship lands on the clearest and levelest patch you can find in advance that's near the initial colony location. And you write it off. If it didn't take damage, great! But don't plan on it ever lifting again. If it does, bonus, but don't plan on it. A goodly part of its cargo is robotic earthmoving equipment (this might be just a patch of solar cells to plug into, or a power cable from the on board nuclear pile, and one battery powered vehicle that's a combination grader, front end loader and sinterer, plus a spare)... which busily starts prepping the landing spot for the second ship so there's no FOD. Once done with enough spots it switches to ice mining perhaps.
"I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact." -Elon Musk
"We're a little bit like the dog who caught the bus" - Musk after CRS-8 S1 successfully landed on ASDS OCISLY

Offline Eric Hedman

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 763
  • Liked: 184
  • Likes Given: 157
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #25 on: 10/05/2017 07:53 PM »
The UAE has plans to build a 1.9 million sq. foot prototype Mars city:

http://www.ien.com/product-development/video/20978190/massive-mars-simulation-will-be-built-in-the-desert?utm_medium=email&utm_source=Industrial%20Management%20Today%2010052017&utm_term=15587&email=ehedman@ldcglobal.com

If this goes ahead, it might be a place to test out infrastructure concepts.

Offline corneliussulla

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 191
  • Liked: 43
  • Likes Given: 19
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #26 on: 10/05/2017 11:12 PM »
If you assume about 24 crew in the first ships to arrive. They will probably need about 3-4 tonnes of consumables per person to keep them alive for 3 years. So around 100 tonnes. That leaves us with (6 x 150)-100 for the equipment to make the ISRU plant & power systems and the initial colony. 800 tonnes. There will be redundancy in the deliverables but you can do a lot with that sort of tonnage. For instance major earth moving and drilling machines, science and exploration rovers, pre fabricated buildings, machines to create Martian concrete etc. Life support equipment for the pre fabs. I wonder if bigelow can provide some initial surface habitats. 

U can be certain musk etc have given some thought to this, how otherwise would they have come up with the need for 6 ships.

Offline Zed_Noir

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2190
  • Canada
  • Liked: 280
  • Likes Given: 434
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #27 on: 10/06/2017 03:58 AM »
....
U can be certain musk etc have given some thought to this, how otherwise would they have come up with the need for 6 ships.

Guessing the combine propellants left with at least 4 ships is enough to for 1 ship to get back to Earth, maybe with aerobraking. If ISRU ops don't work as expected.

Online aero

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2736
  • 92129
  • Liked: 704
  • Likes Given: 235
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #28 on: 10/06/2017 05:10 AM »
....
U can be certain musk etc have given some thought to this, how otherwise would they have come up with the need for 6 ships.

Guessing the combine propellants left with at least 4 ships is enough to for 1 ship to get back to Earth, maybe with aerobraking. If ISRU ops don't work as expected.

But remember, these people are colonists. They won't want to come back. Doing so would undercut the whole "multiplanet species" objective, if not destroy it, certainly delay it immensely. Better to die on Mars if you are a true believer in multiplanet humanity. Not saying they will be fanatics, but can we say they won't be?
Retired, working interesting problems

Offline corneliussulla

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 191
  • Liked: 43
  • Likes Given: 19
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #29 on: 10/06/2017 06:15 AM »
I am not sure the first people to arrive will be colonists. If u r a colonist u will want to have a partner with u at least and maybe a family. The first mission will be specialists for construction and science maybe not room for partners maybe the odd couple may fit the bill as specialist and partners . To be honest I don't think enough is known about having a child and its development in low gravity for that to be a proposition before a load of science has been undertaken on Mars.

So first actual colonists may actually come after maybe 6-8 years after initial landing but continuous occupation for all that period. Could be totally wrong of course
« Last Edit: 10/06/2017 06:16 AM by corneliussulla »

Offline colbourne

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 296
  • Liked: 18
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #30 on: 10/06/2017 07:33 AM »
I'm curious about the large dome.

We never really got to the bottom of how to scale domes. Either that pesky ground seam, or a full buried sphere, neither is straight forward. Like any large pressure vessel.

Either way, the stresses quickly become infeasible without internal tension elements. With internal cables, ground anchors, and a sealed floor, the dome is certainly doable.
If you bury the dome, you will not need  the internal cables , or not so many. I suggest the building process would start with bulldozing a large hole. Placing a pre-made dome (flattened sphere) in the hole and slowly inflating , whilst covering with the soil removed from the hole.
Once inflated to the correct shape (but still at low pressure) it would be good to use damp soil that can freeze to add strength (probably need a covering to prevent sublimation ).
The dome could be a double layer and allow water to fill the space, allowing natural light to pass whilst giving radiation shielding.

Offline meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7613
  • N. California
  • Liked: 3934
  • Likes Given: 816
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #31 on: 10/06/2017 08:17 AM »
I'm curious about the large dome.

We never really got to the bottom of how to scale domes. Either that pesky ground seam, or a full buried sphere, neither is straight forward. Like any large pressure vessel.

Either way, the stresses quickly become infeasible without internal tension elements. With internal cables, ground anchors, and a sealed floor, the dome is certainly doable.
If you bury the dome, you will not need  the internal cables , or not so many. I suggest the building process would start with bulldozing a large hole. Placing a pre-made dome (flattened sphere) in the hole and slowly inflating , whilst covering with the soil removed from the hole.
Once inflated to the correct shape (but still at low pressure) it would be good to use damp soil that can freeze to add strength (probably need a covering to prevent sublimation ).
The dome could be a double layer and allow water to fill the space, allowing natural light to pass whilst giving radiation shielding.
For large domes, the tensile stress around the perimeter (or any great circles) increases with D, so you need to keep making the walls thicker. Basically, for a fixed material, the amount of wall material is proportional to D^3.

So you're not gaining anything, except for the fact you'll lose more stuff if the dome blows, and that you'll have to build high in order to utilize the volume.

OTOH, you get large open spaces.

--

Interestingly, thicker walls weigh more, so at some point will counter the internal pressure - but only in the vertical direction.
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Online KelvinZero

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3464
  • Liked: 453
  • Likes Given: 114
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #32 on: 10/06/2017 09:05 AM »
BTW, there was a big discussion of geodesic domes here, due to a specific Elon Musk comment

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=41526

That thread is quite long. IMO it is not too important. It will be worked out by engineers with boring numbers long before it becomes an issue. Domes, Cylinders, Spheres, Toruses, Whatever.

« Last Edit: 10/06/2017 09:58 AM by KelvinZero »

Offline jpo234

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 544
  • Liked: 353
  • Likes Given: 51
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #33 on: 10/06/2017 09:52 AM »
I am not sure the first people to arrive will be colonists. If u r a colonist u will want to have a partner with u at least and maybe a family. The first mission will be specialists for construction and science maybe not room for partners maybe the odd couple may fit the bill as specialist and partners . To be honest I don't think enough is known about having a child and its development in low gravity for that to be a proposition before a load of science has been undertaken on Mars.

So first actual colonists may actually come after maybe 6-8 years after initial landing but continuous occupation for all that period. Could be totally wrong of course

Maybe it's time to revive my old thread:
Topic: Speculation and Discussion: Crew for first SpaceX Mars mission
You want to be inspired by things. You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great. That's what being a spacefaring civilization is all about. It's about believing in the future and believing the future will be better than the past. And I can't think of anything more exciting than being out there among the stars.

Offline jpo234

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 544
  • Liked: 353
  • Likes Given: 51
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #34 on: 10/06/2017 03:11 PM »
Haven't seen this yet: MARTIAN HABITATS: MOLEHILLS OR GLASS HOUSES?

Most interestingly it goes into the issue of locally sourced building materials.
« Last Edit: 10/06/2017 03:14 PM by jpo234 »
You want to be inspired by things. You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great. That's what being a spacefaring civilization is all about. It's about believing in the future and believing the future will be better than the past. And I can't think of anything more exciting than being out there among the stars.

Offline DOCinCT

If you assume about 24 crew in the first ships to arrive. They will probably need about 3-4 tonnes of consumables per person to keep them alive for 3 years. So around 100 tonnes. That leaves us with (6 x 150)-100 for the equipment to make the ISRU plant & power systems and the initial colony. 800 tonnes. There will be redundancy in the deliverables but you can do a lot with that sort of tonnage. For instance major earth moving and drilling machines, science and exploration rovers, pre fabricated buildings, machines to create Martian concrete etc. Life support equipment for the pre fabs. I wonder if bigelow can provide some initial surface habitats. 

U can be certain musk etc have given some thought to this, how otherwise would they have come up with the need for 6 ships.
Habitats were not on the short list of things to do, although I would agree that it is something that needs to happen, unless the crew ships are designed for long term habitation.
From the presentation:
First mission, 2 cargo ships. "Confirm water resources and identify hazards. Place power, mining, and life support infrastructure for future flights."
The second mission (2 cargo and 2 crew), "...the goal is to build the propellant plant. So we should, particular with six ships there, have plenty of landed mass to construct the propellant depot, which will consist of a large array of solar panels, a very large array, and then everything necessary to mine and refine water, and then draw the CO2 out of the atmosphere, and then create and store deep-cryo CH4 and O2."

Offline MikeAtkinson

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1667
  • Bracknell, England
  • Liked: 449
  • Likes Given: 51
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #36 on: 10/06/2017 04:12 PM »
Although we should not take the base images too seriously, note that they contain many islands of connected structures. As it is unlikely that moving from one island to another would involve a trip outside, this implies hidden tunnels connecting the structures.

Online aero

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2736
  • 92129
  • Liked: 704
  • Likes Given: 235
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #37 on: 10/06/2017 11:40 PM »
If you assume about 24 crew in the first ships to arrive. They will probably need about 3-4 tonnes of consumables per person to keep them alive for 3 years. So around 100 tonnes. That leaves us with (6 x 150)-100 for the equipment to make the ISRU plant & power systems and the initial colony. 800 tonnes. There will be redundancy in the deliverables but you can do a lot with that sort of tonnage. For instance major earth moving and drilling machines, science and exploration rovers, pre fabricated buildings, machines to create Martian concrete etc. Life support equipment for the pre fabs. I wonder if bigelow can provide some initial surface habitats. 

U can be certain musk etc have given some thought to this, how otherwise would they have come up with the need for 6 ships.
Habitats were not on the short list of things to do, although I would agree that it is something that needs to happen, unless the crew ships are designed for long term habitation.
From the presentation:
First mission, 2 cargo ships. "Confirm water resources and identify hazards. Place power, mining, and life support infrastructure for future flights."
The second mission (2 cargo and 2 crew), "...the goal is to build the propellant plant. So we should, particular with six ships there, have plenty of landed mass to construct the propellant depot, which will consist of a large array of solar panels, a very large array, and then everything necessary to mine and refine water, and then draw the CO2 out of the atmosphere, and then create and store deep-cryo CH4 and O2."

Long-term habitation. How many crew members? Two ships give two or more, and those same two ships give 200 or less. So a better guess is needed. Each ship can support 100 crew for the duration of a trip to Mars, say 6 months. That is support for 18,000 person days. Two ships, 36,000 person days of supplies. We guesstimate that it is, maybe, 240 days from Earth departure to resupply on Mars. That results in supplies for 150 crew available on the two ships, 75 crew per ship. Of course, if you want to plan for missing the first resupply opportunity then that number is approximately halved.

I don't see any justification for 3 years worth of supplies per person. The first resupply opportunity is much less than 3 years and the second resupply opportunity is much more than 3 years. Three years is just enough supplies to let the crew starve slowly if the first resupply window is missed.
Retired, working interesting problems

Online chalz

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 168
  • Austrangia
  • Liked: 77
  • Likes Given: 990
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #38 on: 10/07/2017 02:02 AM »
Although we should not take the base images too seriously, note that they contain many islands of connected structures. As it is unlikely that moving from one island to another would involve a trip outside, this implies hidden tunnels connecting the structures.
Or you drive between buildings in a pressurised vehicle.

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9066
  • Liked: 1113
  • Likes Given: 755
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #39 on: 10/07/2017 02:11 AM »
Did you get mine ?

You shouldn't trust everything that Elon says just because he's Elon.
No one is forcing you on this thread.

We get it. These might be just totally random CGI assets. But they don't look like it, they have what looks like intentional design features made for Mars and that fit with SpaceX's architecture.

SpaceX was asked about their intentions for building a city on Mars, they said that their intention was to build the transportation for it but that they won't build the actual city. They have no intention of building a Moon base either.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26862
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 6770
  • Likes Given: 4802
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #40 on: 10/07/2017 02:35 AM »
Did you get mine ?

You shouldn't trust everything that Elon says just because he's Elon.
No one is forcing you on this thread.

We get it. These might be just totally random CGI assets. But they don't look like it, they have what looks like intentional design features made for Mars and that fit with SpaceX's architecture.

SpaceX was asked about their intentions for building a city on Mars, they said that their intention was to build the transportation for it but that they won't build the actual city. They have no intention of building a Moon base either.

You'll need to find a direct quote because Musk disagrees with you:
Quote
"This is intended to be a significant amount of revenue and help fund a city on Mars. Looking in the long term, and saying what's needed to create a city on Mars? Well, one thing's for sure: a lot of money."
http://shitelonsays.com/transcript/spacex-seattle-2015-2015-01-15
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline colbourne

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 296
  • Liked: 18
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #41 on: 10/14/2017 01:02 PM »
We dont actually need heavy bulldozers and boring equipment. I am sure some good old fashioned explosive can dig nice holes perfect for housing our flattened sphere or dome.
The dome does not need to be wasted space if you make use of it with multi floors.

Offline guckyfan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6307
  • Germany
  • Liked: 1576
  • Likes Given: 1378
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #42 on: 10/14/2017 03:25 PM »
SpaceX was asked about their intentions for building a city on Mars, they said that their intention was to build the transportation for it but that they won't build the actual city. They have no intention of building a Moon base either.

You'll need to find a direct quote because Musk disagrees with you:
Quote
"This is intended to be a significant amount of revenue and help fund a city on Mars. Looking in the long term, and saying what's needed to create a city on Mars? Well, one thing's for sure: a lot of money."
http://shitelonsays.com/transcript/spacex-seattle-2015-2015-01-15

We have the much more recent statement by Gwynne Shotwell at Stanford a few days back.

Quote
Will SpaceX work with other companies regarding infrastructure on the surface of Mars?

SpaceX is focused on the transportation part of the Mars problem, but people need somewhere to go once they arrive. I don't think it's an accident that Elon started the Boring Company, tunnels will be very important in the first steps of living on Mars, before we build domes and terraform. We want other companies to start thinking about it and working on it, but we'll do it if we have to. I think the BFR might be ready before these other components of actually living on Mars.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26862
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 6770
  • Likes Given: 4802
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #43 on: 10/14/2017 03:44 PM »
And?
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline guckyfan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6307
  • Germany
  • Liked: 1576
  • Likes Given: 1378
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #44 on: 10/14/2017 04:25 PM »
And?

I was confirming your position with a newer quote.

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9066
  • Liked: 1113
  • Likes Given: 755
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #45 on: 10/14/2017 10:23 PM »
More or less. SpaceX will do it if no else does it isn't the same thing as we will build a city on Mars. 

In any event, here is another recent quote:

Quote from: Elon Musk
Our goal is get you there and ensure the basic infrastructure for propellant production and survival is in place. A rough analogy is that we are trying to build the equivalent of the transcontinental railway. A vast amount of industry will need to be built on Mars by many other companies and millions of people.

https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/76e79c/i_am_elon_musk_ask_me_anything_about_bfr/dodh7t2/?context=3
« Last Edit: 10/14/2017 10:39 PM by yg1968 »

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9066
  • Liked: 1113
  • Likes Given: 755
Re: SpaceX surface habs & infrastructure (from IAC 2017)
« Reply #46 on: 10/14/2017 10:31 PM »
About the city on Mars image, Elon says:

Quote from: Elon Musk
Wouldn't read too much into that illustration

https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/76e79c/i_am_elon_musk_ask_me_anything_about_bfr/dodhms4/?context=3


Tags: