Author Topic: New NSF Launch Calendar Options  (Read 3228 times)

Offline Lar

  • Fan boy at large
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8654
  • Saw Gemini live on TV
  • A large LEGO storage facility ... in Michigan
  • Liked: 5393
  • Likes Given: 3565
Re: New NSF Launch Calendar Options
« Reply #20 on: 09/26/2017 07:00 PM »
With an underlying queryable database. Not just a forum post.

(as I told someone offline "never ask an architect for requirements" ... unless you want pie in the sky)

Seems straight forward enough.

      If linking to related articles, all the needed data could be embedded in the articles in question.
If it's in the articles in question, it's not queryable from a database/calendar/list-ish sort of view.

to gongora's point, this really is pie in the sky for a volunteer effort, this data is not all there, and in many cases needs someone that wanted to go find it.

Maybe it's overreaching to want a queryable database that is "better" or more comprehensive than all the other assets out there.
"I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact." -Elon Musk
"We're a little bit like the dog who caught the bus" - Musk after CRS-8 S1 successfully landed on ASDS OCISLY

Offline Coastal Ron

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3446
  • I live... along the coast
  • Liked: 2203
  • Likes Given: 2730
Re: New NSF Launch Calendar Options
« Reply #21 on: 09/26/2017 08:55 PM »
One decision that would need to be made is whether you actually want it shown on a calendar or show it as a list (or both).  The calendar can be nice for near-term launches but quickly becomes unwieldy as you go farther out (you wind up with 10 launches listed next April 1 for all the "April 2018" and "Q2 2018" launches.

If the goal is to maximize information, and not whitespace, then go with a list. Calendar days with no activity add nothing, and for those rare days when two things are happening (or even three) then either all days on that line need to expand, or the information in that day block has to be compressed - lots of compromises.

A list would allow for enough information to be provides without creating cascading formatting issues. Could even be put into an HTML Table.
If we don't continuously lower the cost to access space, how are we ever going to afford to expand humanity out into space?

Online mtakala24

Re: New NSF Launch Calendar Options
« Reply #22 on: 09/26/2017 09:15 PM »
Just my 2 cents worth: Launch library listings seems to be accurate and well maintained. Why don't we consider using it as the main source?

Offline NSF Webmaster

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Almere, The Netherlands
    • NASASpaceFlight.com
  • Liked: 99
  • Likes Given: 10
Re: New NSF Launch Calendar Options
« Reply #23 on: 09/26/2017 09:36 PM »
Just my 2 cents worth: Launch library listings seems to be accurate and well maintained. Why don't we consider using it as the main source?

It will be the source only to be managed in another way :)

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2092
  • US
  • Liked: 1457
  • Likes Given: 1036
Re: New NSF Launch Calendar Options
« Reply #24 on: 09/26/2017 09:42 PM »
Just my 2 cents worth: Launch library listings seems to be accurate and well maintained. Why don't we consider using it as the main source?

Is this what you're talking about: https://launchlibrary.net/?  If so, the information is a bit outdated compared to our manifests.  I guess we could always partner with another group and help them keep their schedule up to date if we wanted to go that route.

Offline Tomness

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 137
  • Into the abyss will I run
  • Liked: 30
  • Likes Given: 149
Re: New NSF Launch Calendar Options
« Reply #25 on: 09/26/2017 10:10 PM »
Would the possibly of using Launch Library... which is probably run by some of the the members here be useful for the database or you feel your archive is probably more accurate?
Just my 2 cents worth: Launch library listings seems to be accurate and well maintained. Why don't we consider using it as the main source?

It will be the source only to be managed in another way :)

This is True... Chris B Does Drop L2 Launch Dates right off the press lol

Tags: