Author Topic: SpaceX Core Spotting  (Read 24711 times)

Offline old_sellsword

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 518
  • Liked: 419
  • Likes Given: 375
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #40 on: 08/20/2017 07:46 PM »
1029.2 definitely didn't stop in McGregor after Iridium-1. We have one report of 1031.2 returning to McGregor from someone who claims to be an employee, but that's about it.

In related news, 1025.2 was finally just spotted heading east west towards McGregor for its post-conversion firing.

Edit: east --> west
« Last Edit: 08/20/2017 09:10 PM by Chris Bergin »

Online gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1641
  • US
  • Liked: 1082
  • Likes Given: 862
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #41 on: 08/20/2017 08:03 PM »
In related news, 1025.2 was finally just spotted heading east towards McGregor for its post-conversion firing.

I may be confused, but was it going east or west?

Offline old_sellsword

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 518
  • Liked: 419
  • Likes Given: 375
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #42 on: 08/20/2017 08:44 PM »
In related news, 1025.2 was finally just spotted heading east towards McGregor for its post-conversion firing.

I may be confused, but was it going east or west?

West, OP just clarified in the Reddit thread.

Offline Ronsmytheiii

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22267
  • Liked: 528
  • Likes Given: 234
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #43 on: 08/24/2017 08:11 PM »

Offline vanoord

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
  • Liked: 258
  • Likes Given: 26
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #44 on: 08/25/2017 08:55 AM »
Presumably CRS-12 / B1039 ?

Offline Jakusb

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 501
  • NL
  • Liked: 234
  • Likes Given: 57
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #45 on: 08/28/2017 09:40 AM »
Presumably CRS-12 / B1039 ?

Most likely indeed (as in 99,99% sure)

Offline jpo234

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 453
  • Liked: 289
  • Likes Given: 41
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #46 on: 08/31/2017 11:22 AM »
« Last Edit: 08/31/2017 01:38 PM by jpo234 »

Offline Ronsmytheiii

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22267
  • Liked: 528
  • Likes Given: 234
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #47 on: 09/04/2017 04:13 PM »

Offline Mader Levap

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 914
  • Liked: 373
  • Likes Given: 359
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #48 on: 09/04/2017 04:45 PM »
I guess those are cores that won't be used in actual launches.
Be successful.  Then tell the haters to (BLEEP) off. - deruch
...and if you have failure, tell it anyway.

Offline old_sellsword

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 518
  • Liked: 419
  • Likes Given: 375
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #49 on: 09/04/2017 04:55 PM »
I guess those are cores that won't be used in actual launches.

They’ve been preliminarily identified as 1029.2 and 1032.1, so retirement would be a good guess for their outcomes.

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12575
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 3379
  • Likes Given: 561
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #50 on: 09/04/2017 07:31 PM »
I guess those are cores that won't be used in actual launches.

They’ve been preliminarily identified as 1029.2 and 1032.1, so retirement would be a good guess for their outcomes.
I wonder.  This could be the place that cores go to die (given that 1026 rested here before it was scrapped), but didn't 1032 - the NROL-76 booster - do a fairly benign return to LZ-1?

 - Ed Kyle

Offline A12

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 176
  • ROME, ITALY
  • Liked: 31
  • Likes Given: 313
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #51 on: 09/04/2017 09:42 PM »
The one with two flight on log could be good enough for the Smithsonian (or some other museum if they already have one).

Online Herb Schaltegger

Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #52 on: 09/04/2017 10:35 PM »
The one with two flight on log could be good enough for the Smithsonian (or some other museum if they already have one).

Unless SpaceX is satisfied with the results of their post-flight testing, I would think any core with two flight cycles would be a prime candidate for methodical disassembly and destructive testing to compare results with analysis.
Ad astra per aspirin ...

Offline old_sellsword

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 518
  • Liked: 419
  • Likes Given: 375
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #53 on: 09/05/2017 07:53 PM »
Transport X-37B in fairing to LC-39A HIF



In that video, we can see 1033.1 on the left side of the hangar, and 1023.2 on the right side. You can also see 1040.1 on the pad.

An F9 (likely 1041.1) just left McGregor heading west, so it's probably on its way to VAFB for Iridium-3.

Online vaporcobra

Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #54 on: 09/05/2017 11:51 PM »
Transport X-37B in fairing to LC-39A HIF



In that video, we can see 1033.1 on the left side of the hangar, and 1023.2 on the right side. You can also see 1040.1 on the pad.

An F9 (likely 1041.1) just left McGregor heading west, so it's probably on its way to VAFB for Iridium-3.

Is the nosecone removed during storage? That was what I was using to judge the core on the right, didn't want to assume it was 1023.2 in spite of that being the logical conclusion. With 1033.1, you can easily see the pink shrink-wrapped side booster connection point.

Offline old_sellsword

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 518
  • Liked: 419
  • Likes Given: 375
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #55 on: 09/06/2017 12:00 AM »
Transport X-37B in fairing to LC-39A HIF



In that video, we can see 1033.1 on the left side of the hangar, and 1023.2 on the right side. You can also see 1040.1 on the pad.

An F9 (likely 1041.1) just left McGregor heading west, so it's probably on its way to VAFB for Iridium-3.

Is the nosecone removed during storage? That was what I was using to judge the core on the right, didn't want to assume it was 1023.2 in spite of that being the logical conclusion. With 1033.1, you can easily see the pink shrink-wrapped side booster connection point.

I personally see a nosecone on the right booster, but I guess that’s up for interpretation. We haven’t 1023.2 leave 39A, so that’s what I assumed it was.

Offline jjyach

  • Member
  • Posts: 35
  • Liked: 70
  • Likes Given: 22
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #56 on: 09/06/2017 01:09 PM »
Neither core to the sides of the TEL in the hanger has a nosecone attached.  The booster on the right hand side for sure has a pusher inside the interstage area if that helps at all.

Offline old_sellsword

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 518
  • Liked: 419
  • Likes Given: 375
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #57 on: 09/06/2017 02:11 PM »
Neither core to the sides of the TEL in the hanger has a nosecone attached.  The booster on the right hand side for sure has a pusher inside the interstage area if that helps at all.

That does, thanks. So that means 1023.2 left 39A and is somewhere else in Cape Canaveral, and now there’s a mystery F9 at 39A.

Offline douglas100

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2142
  • Liked: 213
  • Likes Given: 95
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #58 on: 09/06/2017 03:45 PM »
Neither core to the sides of the TEL in the hanger has a nosecone attached.  The booster on the right hand side for sure has a pusher inside the interstage area if that helps at all.

The TEL isn't in the hangar. It's out on the pad.
Douglas Clark

Offline jjyach

  • Member
  • Posts: 35
  • Liked: 70
  • Likes Given: 22
Re: SpaceX Core Spotting
« Reply #59 on: 09/06/2017 03:59 PM »
Neither core to the sides of the TEL in the hanger has a nosecone attached.  The booster on the right hand side for sure has a pusher inside the interstage area if that helps at all.

The TEL isn't in the hangar. It's out on the pad.

The TEL is still in the hanger right now.  Also the booster to the left of the TEL has some pink square next to the raceway at the top.  Any chance 1033 is the one to the right and 1023 is to the left?  Or any chance they kept the pusher in 1023 to keep under the nose cone?
« Last Edit: 09/06/2017 04:13 PM by jjyach »

Tags: