Very special article. I liked how you've not lingered on the event of the disasters in both tribute articles.Was that the intention? Very respectful if so.
Quote from: Paul Howard on 02/01/2011 06:02 pmVery special article. I liked how you've not lingered on the event of the disasters in both tribute articles.Was that the intention? Very respectful if so.To echo what Chris B said, the decision to not linger on the accidents was something that just felt natural to me. I really can't explain that in any other way.
Quote from: ChrisGebhardt on 02/01/2011 06:33 pmQuote from: Paul Howard on 02/01/2011 06:02 pmVery special article. I liked how you've not lingered on the event of the disasters in both tribute articles.Was that the intention? Very respectful if so.To echo what Chris B said, the decision to not linger on the accidents was something that just felt natural to me. I really can't explain that in any other way.I think it's a good idea, and for someone who has been interested in the history of the program for 30 years, it would be fascinating to me to go back and look at the missions prior to NSF's inception, NSF-style.