Excuse me. Is this not supposed to be a ULA thread? What's with all the SpaceX felgercarb here?
It is. The topic being discussed is ULA's management attitude and response to challenges and to changes in the market.
This was relevant back with Michael Gass, and is relevant today with Tory Bruno.
SpaceX was only brought into the discussion when the rationale for their attitude was argued as "RTLS reuse is not proven yet". It's just like the discussion might veer into "where can ULA and BO's relationship lead", or "how is ULA responding to BO's NG". The discussion never went into the details of SpaceX-style reuse.