3rd Party review of the "Rossi Device." is now available. I was and remain extremely skeptical, but the paper is interesting readinghttp://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913
Quote from: bad_astra on 05/20/2013 07:02 pm3rd Party review of the "Rossi Device." is now available. I was and remain extremely skeptical, but the paper is interesting readinghttp://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913i stil think this is not a cold fusion device, its merely a new form of energy transistor.
http://northerncalifornia.alumclub.mit.edu/s/1314/2015/club-class-main.aspx?sid=1314&gid=25&pgid=40742&cid=62473&ecid=62473&crid=0&calpgid=19964&calcid=33394Peter Hagelstein will be giving some sort of public address in Palo Alto November 14. Might be interesting.
Quote from: Elmar Moelzer on 10/07/2015 07:25 pmQuote from: sghill on 10/07/2015 07:05 pmOr if you simply want hard information on why the e-cat reactor doesn't work as advertised go here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/258595858/USPTO-Final-Rejection-Rossi-PatentHonestly, I am still scratching my head over what changed between March when USPTO issued a "final rejection" letter to Rossi and August when they accepted the application and granted the patent, but I go do some primary research before shooting my mouth off.Different patent. The new patent does not mention LENR in any way.I want to add that while there are a lot of "notes" from respectable scientists floating around, I have yet to see a peer reviewed paper in a physics publication that actually confirms the whole thing. So far, all I see are reviews by "believers" and nothing from skeptics. You need to convince the latter and not the former in order to convince me.Rossi's claim is not whats really happening i guess. I think they just made a form of energy transistor, not a fusion reactor.
Quote from: sghill on 10/07/2015 07:05 pmOr if you simply want hard information on why the e-cat reactor doesn't work as advertised go here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/258595858/USPTO-Final-Rejection-Rossi-PatentHonestly, I am still scratching my head over what changed between March when USPTO issued a "final rejection" letter to Rossi and August when they accepted the application and granted the patent, but I go do some primary research before shooting my mouth off.Different patent. The new patent does not mention LENR in any way.I want to add that while there are a lot of "notes" from respectable scientists floating around, I have yet to see a peer reviewed paper in a physics publication that actually confirms the whole thing. So far, all I see are reviews by "believers" and nothing from skeptics. You need to convince the latter and not the former in order to convince me.
Or if you simply want hard information on why the e-cat reactor doesn't work as advertised go here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/258595858/USPTO-Final-Rejection-Rossi-PatentHonestly, I am still scratching my head over what changed between March when USPTO issued a "final rejection" letter to Rossi and August when they accepted the application and granted the patent, but I go do some primary research before shooting my mouth off.