Author Topic: General ISS Q&A thread  (Read 879596 times)

Offline arkaska

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3042
  • Sweden
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1900 on: 05/17/2012 10:05 am »
I thought the FGB solar arrays were just retracted enough to make clearance for the radiators and not completely and that they still produced power.

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10288
  • Liked: 699
  • Likes Given: 723
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1901 on: 05/17/2012 02:23 pm »
I thought the FGB solar arrays were just retracted enough to make clearance for the radiators and not completely and that they still produced power.

I don't think they are active, but even if they were, they are so old and degraded that probably not much would be generated.

Offline manboy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
  • Texas, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 134
  • Likes Given: 544
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1902 on: 05/17/2012 03:11 pm »
Are the current FGB solar arrays removable (they are folded up right now)? If so, could new smaller, shorter arrays be installed so that the FGB could produce some small amount of power?  The panels installed on Mir, for example, were transported inside a cargo ship, and extended during the installation process; perhaps similar panels could be installed on FGB.
Weren't they only transported by the Shuttle during the installation of the Mir docking module?
« Last Edit: 05/17/2012 03:11 pm by manboy »
"Cheese has been sent into space before. But the same cheese has never been sent into space twice." - StephenB

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10288
  • Liked: 699
  • Likes Given: 723
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1903 on: 05/17/2012 03:27 pm »
Are the current FGB solar arrays removable (they are folded up right now)? If so, could new smaller, shorter arrays be installed so that the FGB could produce some small amount of power?  The panels installed on Mir, for example, were transported inside a cargo ship, and extended during the installation process; perhaps similar panels could be installed on FGB.

Weren't they only transported by the Shuttle during the installation of the Mir docking module?

Some were, yes. Others had been transported up earlier.
« Last Edit: 05/17/2012 03:29 pm by Danderman »

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37440
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 21450
  • Likes Given: 428
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1904 on: 05/17/2012 04:19 pm »
Are the current FGB solar arrays removable (they are folded up right now)? If so, could new smaller, shorter arrays be installed so that the FGB could produce some small amount of power?  The panels installed on Mir, for example, were transported inside a cargo ship, and extended during the installation process; perhaps similar panels could be installed on FGB.


No attach points or power connections for such panels

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10288
  • Liked: 699
  • Likes Given: 723
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1905 on: 05/17/2012 04:56 pm »
Are the current FGB solar arrays removable (they are folded up right now)? If so, could new smaller, shorter arrays be installed so that the FGB could produce some small amount of power?  The panels installed on Mir, for example, were transported inside a cargo ship, and extended during the installation process; perhaps similar panels could be installed on FGB.


No attach points or power connections for such panels

I am assuming/wishing that the existing FGB solar panel attachments support removal of the panels, as did earlier TKS-based modules. I have no idea if this is true or not.


Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37440
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 21450
  • Likes Given: 428
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1906 on: 05/17/2012 05:03 pm »

I am assuming/wishing that the existing FGB solar panel attachments support removal of the panels, as did earlier TKS-based modules.

Where is that documented?  If the capability existed, it was never employed.  Only the DOS's used that capability.

Also, it isn't the Russia's module to put such arrays on.  Boeing nor NASA would have spec'ed such a requirement.
« Last Edit: 05/17/2012 05:05 pm by Jim »

Offline Space Pete

Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1907 on: 05/17/2012 05:25 pm »
I thought the FGB solar arrays were just retracted enough to make clearance for the radiators and not completely and that they still produced power.

I don't think they are active - I remember reading in an ISS on-orbit status report a while back about some "no-longer needed" internal power generation/distribution equipment being removed from the FGB.
NASASpaceflight ISS Editor

Offline erioladastra

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1413
  • Liked: 222
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1908 on: 05/17/2012 06:58 pm »
I thought the FGB solar arrays were just retracted enough to make clearance for the radiators and not completely and that they still produced power.

I don't think they are active - I remember reading in an ISS on-orbit status report a while back about some "no-longer needed" internal power generation/distribution equipment being removed from the FGB.

They were retracted for clearnace reasons so attaching new ones wouldn't be possible.  Although retracted there is a trickle of power coming from them.

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10288
  • Liked: 699
  • Likes Given: 723
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1909 on: 05/17/2012 08:22 pm »

I am assuming/wishing that the existing FGB solar panel attachments support removal of the panels, as did earlier TKS-based modules.

Where is that documented?  If the capability existed, it was never employed.  Only the DOS's used that capability.

Also, it isn't the Russia's module to put such arrays on.  Boeing nor NASA would have spec'ed such a requirement.

Since the earlier TKS modules did have the capability of moving around solar arrays, I suspect that NASA and Rockwell would have had to specify that this capability be deleted.

Note: I checked the FGB requirements, and it was specified to share operating mechanisms like solar panels, antennas, etc with the earlier Mir TKS modules. I think everyone knows that the solar panels on the TKS modules were able to be moved around from module to module.

« Last Edit: 05/17/2012 08:34 pm by Danderman »

Offline Jorge

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6404
  • Liked: 529
  • Likes Given: 67
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1910 on: 05/17/2012 08:31 pm »

I am assuming/wishing that the existing FGB solar panel attachments support removal of the panels, as did earlier TKS-based modules.

Where is that documented?  If the capability existed, it was never employed.  Only the DOS's used that capability.

Also, it isn't the Russia's module to put such arrays on.  Boeing nor NASA would have spec'ed such a requirement.

Since the earlier TKS modules did have the capability of moving around solar arrays, I suspect that NASA and Rockwell would have had to specify that this capability be deleted.


Was Rockwell ever involved with the FGB? I would have thought that if Boeing "inherited" the FGB from anyone, it would have been MDAC.
JRF

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10288
  • Liked: 699
  • Likes Given: 723
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1911 on: 05/17/2012 08:42 pm »


Was Rockwell ever involved with the FGB? I would have thought that if Boeing "inherited" the FGB from anyone, it would have been MDAC.

My memory is that the documents I saw 20 years ago were from Rockwell. However, one of the requirements documents I have now specifies that its a Lockheed document.

I have no idea why Lockheed was involved with Khrunichev at that time; of course, Rockwell had a legacy of working with the Russians, so they were all over Energia and Khrunichev  in the early 1990s.

MacDac was Work Package 2, I don't recall anything that MacDac had to do with the Russians, but more importantly, Boeing didn't get MacDac until the FGB was pretty much done.
« Last Edit: 05/17/2012 08:44 pm by Danderman »

Offline Nicolas PILLET

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2454
  • Gien, France
    • Kosmonavtika
  • Liked: 670
  • Likes Given: 134
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1912 on: 05/17/2012 10:57 pm »
could new smaller, shorter arrays be installed so that the FGB could produce some small amount of power?

Khrunichev had a project to replace the aft segments of the panels by smaller ones. See figure 6 in my page :

http://www.kosmonavtika.com/vaisseaux/mks/elements/zaria/tech/12/12.html

Also, I confirm that systems used for power production were removed after the retraction of the panels, and that consequently it is strictly impossible to produce power with FGB's panels.
Nicolas PILLET
Kosmonavtika : The French site on Russian Space

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10288
  • Liked: 699
  • Likes Given: 723
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1913 on: 05/18/2012 12:19 am »
Its interesting to see that Khrunichev thought that FGB solar panels could be removed and replaced.

As for the removal of power elements that preclude future use of the FGB solar panels, I suspect that these could probably be replaced if there were a requirement to do so. Right now, there is no requirement for additional power.

This ignores the big question of what to do with the existing folded panels if they were to be replaced.

Offline erioladastra

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1413
  • Liked: 222
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1914 on: 05/24/2012 09:54 pm »
could new smaller, shorter arrays be installed so that the FGB could produce some small amount of power?

Khrunichev had a project to replace the aft segments of the panels by smaller ones. See figure 6 in my page :

http://www.kosmonavtika.com/vaisseaux/mks/elements/zaria/tech/12/12.html

Also, I confirm that systems used for power production were removed after the retraction of the panels, and that consequently it is strictly impossible to produce power with FGB's panels.

Sorry, I missed this earlier.  But your source is incorrect - the FGB panels produce up to about 500W of power.  The Russians use this power and reduce what the pull from the USOS based on how much they are getting.

Offline Nicolas PILLET

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2454
  • Gien, France
    • Kosmonavtika
  • Liked: 670
  • Likes Given: 134
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1915 on: 05/27/2012 05:20 pm »
Also, I confirm that systems used for power production were removed after the retraction of the panels, and that consequently it is strictly impossible to produce power with FGB's panels.

Sorry, I missed this earlier.  But your source is incorrect - the FGB panels produce up to about 500W of power.  The Russians use this power and reduce what the pull from the USOS based on how much they are getting.

Really ?? My source is NASA  :) But it wouldn't be the first time they are wrong while speaking about Russian hardware...  ;)
Nicolas PILLET
Kosmonavtika : The French site on Russian Space

Offline wjbarnett

Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1916 on: 05/30/2012 07:36 pm »
During today's ISS Update hour on NTV, I noticed they were in the 'prior shuttle' FCR, rather than what I believe is the 'normal ISS' FCR (I don't remember the proper labels for the different FCRs). Do we know why? Is the station FCR being upgraded or something?
Jack

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10288
  • Liked: 699
  • Likes Given: 723
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1917 on: 05/30/2012 08:13 pm »
the FGB panels produce up to about 500W of power.  The Russians use this power and reduce what the pull from the USOS based on how much they are getting.

Really?

Do you have a good source for this????

Offline Jorge

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6404
  • Liked: 529
  • Likes Given: 67
Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1918 on: 05/30/2012 08:53 pm »
During today's ISS Update hour on NTV, I noticed they were in the 'prior shuttle' FCR, rather than what I believe is the 'normal ISS' FCR (I don't remember the proper labels for the different FCRs).

FCR-1 - ISS
FCR-2 - Apollo (historic restoration)
Red FCR - Training/ISS
White FCR - Shuttle/ISS
Blue FCR - Testbed

Quote
Do we know why? Is the station FCR being upgraded or something?

I believe they're getting the new intercom keysets.
JRF

Offline wjbarnett

Re: General ISS Q&A thread
« Reply #1919 on: 05/30/2012 09:01 pm »
Much thanks Jorge!
Jack

 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0