Author Topic: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011  (Read 641485 times)

Online Galactic Penguin SST

Hmm... what does this post mean? Something about the communication antennas got stuck in a position obstructing the line of sight with Earth by the external fuel tank? That doesn't sound like a benign chicken-and-egg problem...
Astronomy & spaceflight geek penguin. In a relationship w/ Space Shuttle Discovery. Current Priority: Chasing the Chinese Spaceflight Wonder Egg & A Certain Chinese Mars Rover

Online ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8520
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3543
  • Likes Given: 759
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #581 on: 11/10/2011 02:24 pm »
The way things are developing, did anyone who managed to see it passing overhead notice any sudden flare-ups in brightness that would suggest tumbling, etc?

Offline Nicolas PILLET

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2454
  • Gien, France
    • Kosmonavtika
  • Liked: 670
  • Likes Given: 134
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #582 on: 11/10/2011 02:26 pm »
Brazil observers saw NOTHING -- no flash, no indication of ANY plume -- so it's safe to conclude the failure was on the commanding side, not the engine side?

I think we don't have enough information to draft such a conclusion.
The fact that there was no plume doesn't mean that the engine is not the source of the problem. The absence of plume could mean, for example, that there is an issue with a propellant valve... (this is pure speculation)
Nicolas PILLET
Kosmonavtika : The French site on Russian Space

Offline rcoppola

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
  • USA
  • Liked: 1967
  • Likes Given: 970
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #583 on: 11/10/2011 02:32 pm »
Personally, the mass of robotic explorer craft mean little to me until they attempt an actual surface landing in a gravity well environment. And even then I am mainly interested on the final mass that actually makes it onto the surface. That's the real scale of achievement with regards to a spacecraft's mass, IMO. (Pardon the off-topic here)

If the worst does happen and it can't be salvaged, which is  heartbreaking for those who have spent so many years designing and building it, could we, if asked, shoot it down for them?




Sail the oceans of space and set foot upon new lands!
http://www.stormsurgemedia.com

Online Chris Bergin

I wonder, do we need two threads?


Nope.

We're up to page 40. Most people have this as their update thread link. Half the "news" updates are based on the speculation, naturally. And most people can work out the difference between an update and a person's thoughts.

What we can/will do is move to a fresh update thread when we either have an End of Mission point (let's hope not) or the obvious move to the spacecraft thread to cover the transit to Phobos.

We're best avoiding this thread turning into a debate about how many threads we need ;)
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline satcomuk

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 185
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #585 on: 11/10/2011 02:35 pm »
Interesting comment about the fuel onboard  at the foot of this article...

http://news.yahoo.com/russia-struggles-save-mars-moon-probe-103419852.html

Offline plutogno

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 892
  • Toulouse, France and Milan, Italy
  • Liked: 240
  • Likes Given: 35
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #586 on: 11/10/2011 02:40 pm »
Ouch! Shades of Akatsuki, but possibly no second chance...

more than Akatsuki, it's shades of Nozomi and CONTOUR. and the Russians did the same bad choice that doomed these missions: having no ground stations tracking the burn.

Offline Svetoslav

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1667
  • Bulgaria
  • Liked: 1184
  • Likes Given: 114
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #587 on: 11/10/2011 02:53 pm »
Greetings from me again.

I have news to report. We have a plan for this evening. I will be calling it a sound plan.


http://ria.ru/science/20111110/485724052.html

Russian specialists will try to turn on the main transmitter of Phobos-Grunt, says a specialist from the space industry. Today we have not only the Russians listening for a signal, but also a European base in Australia.

It was announced earlier that Russians will try to contact the spacecraft today in 22:00-23:00 MSK which  means it's two hours after posting my comment.

During the first signal received from the probe it was found out that the solar panels have deployed, the spacecraft is Sun-oriented, and the batteries are being recharged. Then the transmitter was about to be turned off according to the on-board program sequence. He was then scheduled to be turned on several times after, but no signal has been received.

The good news is - the transmitter can be turned on if commanded from Earth. This is what specialists are going to do today. They will send commands to turn the transmitter on and they will listen.
« Last Edit: 11/10/2011 03:00 pm by Svetoslav »

Offline mr. mark

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1996
  • Liked: 172
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #588 on: 11/10/2011 02:58 pm »
Some good news. Let's hope for the best in a few hours.
« Last Edit: 11/10/2011 02:58 pm by mr. mark »

Offline spectre9

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2403
  • Australia
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 68
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #589 on: 11/10/2011 03:00 pm »
I'm still holding out hope  ;D

I don't think it will fall out of orbit or lose power from what I've seen so far.

Offline Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15288
  • Liked: 7823
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #590 on: 11/10/2011 03:05 pm »
Highly unlikely. Russia has no ASAT capacity. Nor do they have ABMs that can be modified to act as ASATs, like the SM-3 could.

To be precise, Russia has no announced, tested, ASAT system. However, several years ago they announced their intention to develop one, and Anatoly Zak gave a talk last week where he showed a picture of a previously-secret ASAT that they had developed in the 1980s that he believes is what they are currently working on.

But I don't expect them to do that even if they have the system ready.

Interesting question: The U.S. actually has formal standards that state that a vehicle must be de-orbited if it poses a risk to public safety. Do we know if the Russians have similar standards?

Offline Antares

  • ABO^2
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5181
  • Done arguing with amateurs
  • Liked: 371
  • Likes Given: 228
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #591 on: 11/10/2011 03:09 pm »
more than Akatsuki, it's shades of Nozomi and CONTOUR. and the Russians did the same bad choice that doomed these missions: having no ground stations tracking the burn.

Lack of telemetry coverage had nothing to do with the failures.  It just made the failure investigations harder.
If I like something on NSF, it's probably because I know it to be accurate.  Every once in a while, it's just something I agree with.  Facts generally receive the former.

Offline rcoppola

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
  • USA
  • Liked: 1967
  • Likes Given: 970
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #592 on: 11/10/2011 03:14 pm »
more than Akatsuki, it's shades of Nozomi and CONTOUR. and the Russians did the same bad choice that doomed these missions: having no ground stations tracking the burn.

Lack of telemetry coverage had nothing to do with the failures.  It just made the failure investigations harder.
Isn't that a failure unto itself?
Sail the oceans of space and set foot upon new lands!
http://www.stormsurgemedia.com

Offline plutogno

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 892
  • Toulouse, France and Milan, Italy
  • Liked: 240
  • Likes Given: 35
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #593 on: 11/10/2011 03:22 pm »
Lack of telemetry coverage had nothing to do with the failures.  It just made the failure investigations harder.

and in the case of Nozomi it made the recovery impossible

Offline Svetoslav

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1667
  • Bulgaria
  • Liked: 1184
  • Likes Given: 114
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #594 on: 11/10/2011 03:23 pm »
http://ria.ru/science/20111110/485786418.html

Latest news from RIA Novosti:

ESA's stations so far have failed to pick up a signal from Phobos-Grunt. More attempts will be made later.

Let's hope that by then Russia will be able to send the commands and turn on the transmitter...

Offline Vladi

  • Member
  • Posts: 13
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #595 on: 11/10/2011 03:23 pm »
The latest rumour on NK has it that the low-gain omnidirectional antenna is not visible from the ground stations as the first fuel tank (the one that was supposed to be disposed of after the first burn) covers it. Which in turn means that they cannot reset the spacecraft and send orders (the directional antennas have really small field of view so chances of a signal being in the way are non-existent). If that is the case, is there any chance that they could get lucky and get a shot at the directional receivers or perhaps put enough power so that the craft could detect the input on the low-gain antenna?

Offline Svetoslav

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1667
  • Bulgaria
  • Liked: 1184
  • Likes Given: 114
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #596 on: 11/10/2011 03:24 pm »
Sorry, I have to leave you again... I will report more news (if there are any) about three hours later

Online Chris Bergin

The latest rumour on NK has it that the low-gain omnidirectional antenna is not visible from the ground stations as the first fuel tank (the one that was supposed to be disposed of after the first burn) covers it. Which in turn means that they cannot reset the spacecraft and send orders (the directional antennas have really small field of view so chances of a signal being in the way are non-existent). If that is the case, is there any chance that they could get lucky and get a shot at the directional receivers or perhaps put enough power so that the craft could detect the input on the low-gain antenna?

Thanks for passing on. While there's still a chance, there's always hope!

As Mr Jon Bon Jovi would say...

Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Online Chris Bergin

Sorry, I have to leave you again... I will report more news (if there are any) about three hours later

You're doing fine work! Nearly 100,000 reads for this thread - over half of which are since the problem was noted, so there's a good amount of interest in any media and internal (even if we need to class as rumor) updates from our guys or the NK guys.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline simonbp

  • Science Guy
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7138
  • Liked: 314
  • Likes Given: 183
Re: LIVE: Zenit-2SB launch with Phobos-Grunt - November 8, 2011
« Reply #599 on: 11/10/2011 03:41 pm »
The latest rumour on NK has it that the low-gain omnidirectional antenna is not visible from the ground stations as the first fuel tank (the one that was supposed to be disposed of after the first burn) covers it. Which in turn means that they cannot reset the spacecraft and send orders (the directional antennas have really small field of view so chances of a signal being in the way are non-existent). If that is the case, is there any chance that they could get lucky and get a shot at the directional receivers or perhaps put enough power so that the craft could detect the input on the low-gain antenna?

Reposting the diagram to be clear; do you mean the two cone-shaped low-gains on the cruise stage? If they are obscured, that really means that they didn't deploy...

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0